|
|
| Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O) (533447) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Dec 14 12:41:21 2007, in response to Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O), posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Dec 14 12:17:56 2007. You still don't understand civil service. If you get a bulletin and it says "report suspicious activities" AND they illustrate some examples of what they mean, then you put your head down, wear your jockstrap and EXPECT to be "efficiency tested" by a beakie on what you were just instructed to do. You don't argue, you DON'T interpret, and you DO NOT assess ... you *DO* what you were TOLD to, nothing else. If something presents itself which was NOT in the tape, you CALL IT IN.If you were taught that something is TERRORISM, then you are govened accordingly as to your instructions. Hourlies are not PERMITTED to "think" ... they're REQUIRED under LAW to DO WHAT THEY'RE TOLD! What part of this don't you get? I have never said anything to the contrary, so I don't know why you keep repeating this idea. If this occurred, and all we've heard is TRUE, then there's a problem in the TRAINING. Sorry, I just don't believe the T/O could have been told, as part of the training, to directly confront a 'suspicious' person in order to enforce a non-existent rule about photography. If you have any evidence to the contrary, I will consider it, as always. isn't about ANYTHING other than "Simon says" and if in DOUBT, ask Simon if they SAID. And like you said, if she misinterpreted/doubted the training and didn't ask for clarification, then it is still her fault! |
|
|
|