|
|
| Re: Brooklyn Dodgers (on topic) (465867) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Brooklyn Dodgers (on topic) |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jul 24 23:47:00 2007, in response to Re: Brooklyn Dodgers (on topic), posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jul 24 22:59:39 2007. And your point about the Underground tunnels being valuable links is...?The point is that the tunnels are just as valuable as a bridge is, except they are not given the credit they deserve, as they aren't as noticable or "speak to the soul" as bridges are. The tunnels are just as important as if they were Bridges instead, yet when we think of New York Scenes (or any city), what do we focus on...the bridges. Would we think of San Francisco the same way when we see an image, if not looking at the beautiful Golden Gate Bridge instead of had it been tbe Golden Gate tunnel? I don't know how high Mr. Roebling was "flying" since he didn't even live to see the bridge's completion. He saw that the project of his bridge was to be completed, even if he didn't see it opened. His design was a beautiful bridge. The same park he wanted to be named after himself. "A rose by any other name...." But anyway, he got a much prettier park named after him..... |
|
|
|