|
|
| Re: Attention Peter Rosa (219747) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Attention Peter Rosa |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Wed Feb 22 22:06:34 2006, in response to Re: Attention Peter Rosa, posted by Peter Rosa on Wed Feb 22 12:04:43 2006. I don't care how much of a fat ass a person has. The only reason why "...yet they're going to end up suffering when the middle seat is taken." is because people get obscenely beligerant when asked to slightly modify their sitting posture in order to accomodate fellow passengers. Nothing I like better in that situation than to "politely" announce my intention to, yes, take that open seat in the middle of three seats.We're all on the public train, not in our easy chairs at home. One ticket intitles you to one seat. Not one and a half seats. You bag/package/"stuff" don't get the right to a seat. Hold your bag in your lap. Put in up in the rack. Put it between your legs. And don't give that crap that "people are bigger today than they were a generation ago." (What people? If you think that the whole population of riders consists of large framed extroverts, you're misinformed.) Unless every rider is as big as Andre The Giant the seats offer sufficient room for relaxing your butt. Accept the fact that, during rush hours, you will be a lil' scrunched whilst onboard. So no, there has been no design flaws in the seating layout on the new trains. Unless you consider an assumption of personal and public dignity and courtesy to others is a design flaw. |
|
|
|