Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) (1410522)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET)

Posted by Wallyhorse on Thu Sep 29 11:05:56 2016, in response to Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET), posted by Dave on Thu Sep 29 11:02:10 2016. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d It's been suggested he may have had a heart attack, and given how this unfolded that sounds quite logical.

Responses

• Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 11:32:23 2016
  • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 11:41:26 2016
    • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Fulton Frank - Thu Sep 29 12:33:08 2016
      • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 12:39:48 2016
        • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Bill Newkirk - Thu Sep 29 12:45:31 2016
          • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 12:50:46 2016
          • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 14:30:15 2016
            • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 14:33:07 2016
      • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 14:29:07 2016
        • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 14:34:10 2016
          • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 14:40:45 2016
            • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 14:54:05 2016
              • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 16:51:01 2016
                • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 18:20:05 2016
                  • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 23:59:33 2016
                    • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Joe V - Fri Sep 30 17:54:50 2016
• Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - T8H5307N - Thu Sep 29 11:51:05 2016
  • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Wallyhorse - Thu Sep 29 11:55:46 2016
    • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 12:31:17 2016
      • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - trains61 - Thu Sep 29 12:41:13 2016
        • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 12:48:41 2016
          • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - BLE-NIMX - Thu Sep 29 13:00:59 2016
          • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Bill from Maspeth - Thu Sep 29 15:20:40 2016
            • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 15:35:12 2016
              • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 16:09:09 2016
                • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Fisk Ave Jim - Thu Sep 29 16:59:20 2016
                  • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 17:46:55 2016
                  • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Bill from Maspeth - Thu Sep 29 18:20:48 2016
        • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 13:06:09 2016
          • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Bill from Maspeth - Thu Sep 29 15:22:54 2016
      • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - chud1 - Thu Sep 29 15:54:08 2016
  • Re: Engineer found slumped (10:41 AM ET) - Jersey Mike - Thu Sep 29 14:31:41 2016

Post a New Response