Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) (1410545)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET)

Posted by trains61 on Thu Sep 29 12:41:13 2016, in response to Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET), posted by Joe V on Thu Sep 29 12:31:17 2016. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d I know we are `Railfans` and are a little more educated then the casual viewer, but those anchors reporting the story are ridiculous. These so called college educated persons sound like morons. Now folks can get a sense of how the Aviation community feels when these same people try to commentate on Air Incidents smh. I hope the death toll does not rise. The Lurkers`Guild

Responses

• Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Joe V - Thu Sep 29 12:48:41 2016
  • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - BLE-NIMX - Thu Sep 29 13:00:59 2016
  • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Bill from Maspeth - Thu Sep 29 15:20:40 2016
    • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 15:35:12 2016
      • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 16:09:09 2016
        • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Fisk Ave Jim - Thu Sep 29 16:59:20 2016
          • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 17:46:55 2016
          • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Bill from Maspeth - Thu Sep 29 18:20:48 2016
• Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - TransitChuckG - Thu Sep 29 13:06:09 2016
  • Re: Back to 1 dead, up to 100 injured (11:55 AM ET) - Bill from Maspeth - Thu Sep 29 15:22:54 2016

Post a New Response