|
|
| Re: (M) train during (L) tunnel closure (1394027) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: (M) train during (L) tunnel closure |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Sat Apr 30 13:02:39 2016, in response to Re: (M) train during (L) tunnel closure, posted by Dupont Circle Station on Sat Apr 30 02:05:02 2016. I get where you're coming from, but as said, the car shortage and being able to use fewer trains overall without potentially royally screwing up other lines because of an unruly passenger or a massive conga line that is well known is why I would have the split and have the (T) run to 96th/2nd.It may also turn out to be a case where such is needed anyway as the main purpose of the (Q) on the SAS is to take pressure off the (6). By the time the (M) comes back online as we know it, this split of the (M) as it is now and the (T) to 96th/2nd may be needed anyway as I suspect the (Q) will get much greater ridership from those tired of taking the (6), especially if they have to work on the west side of midtown anyway (and some on the east side might still do the (Q) to the (S) or (7) to avoid the 4/5/6 crowds, especially if they work at either of the extreme ends of the massive 42nd-Street-Grand Central stop (3rd or Madison Avenues). |
|
|
|