|
|
| Re: (L) to New Jersey (1363880) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: (L) to New Jersey |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Mon Aug 24 23:50:51 2015, in response to Re: (L) to New Jersey, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 23 14:19:33 2015. But the #7 is easier, commercially, relatively speaking.Except that it isn't, not by a long shot. How would you tie the tunnel under the Hudson into the #7 extension tail tracks without causing massive surface disruption? At least Amtrak has made some provisions for an additional Hudson Tunnel. The 7 train was never contemplated as running to Secaucus when built and it's going to be very difficult to turn it west. |
|
|
|