|
|
| Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible (1167627) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Jul 21 09:52:02 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by EastSideRider on Fri Jul 20 21:35:12 2012. Having grown up in NY I think I naturally go to other transit systems with a positive outlook for them. But the only thing I liked in the few times I've used DC Metro over the years is its cleanliness, and I'd rather have a little dirt around the system than wait for trains at off-peak hours with frequencies more representative of buses.Washington's system reminds me a lot of London's. Huge crowds at stations - takes forever to get to the platform - shut down overnight - complex fare structure - but stations and trains are aesthetically pleasing. |
|
|
|