Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible

Posted by EastSideRider on Fri Jul 20 21:35:12 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by italianstallion on Fri Jul 20 18:23:29 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
IAWTP; meanwhile, there's someone else who moved from New York to D.C. who can give an account on why Metro beats the MTA. And another person who's lived in both cities, moved to Portland, and says TriMet beats them both.

Personally, I like both for what each of them provides (and they do provide different things for different reasons), but I realize that BOTH need serious improvement. Hell, ALL American transit systems need improvement somehow; some more than others, but nevertheless. When you run something big like a transit system, or even your own life, you shouldn't be complacent. Keep improving and growing (but don't be afraid of a little break here and there), gauge where and why your customers want to go somewhere, treat your employees and customers with respect (respect is a two way street), things like that. It will take a while for these systems to get to the level they need to be, but it can be done.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]