|
|
| Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible (1167692) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible |
|
|
Posted by TonyG on Sat Jul 21 19:03:50 2012, in response to Re: [Bloomberg news] ... MTA vs. WMATA: Why Metro Is Terrible, posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Sat Jul 21 14:14:08 2012. The issue in NYC in comparison to many other places is that running buses just might not be cost effective at all. Running buses along similar routes to the subway could increase trip times tremendously and as capacity would be tremendously reduced, labor costs would skyrocket as easily 5-6 buses (at a minimum) would be needed to replace 1 train. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|