|
|
| Re: Hudson River rail tunnel project has new name, but same concerns over funding (1162231) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Hudson River rail tunnel project has new name, but same concerns over funding |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jun 17 06:47:12 2012, in response to Re: Hudson River rail tunnel project has new name, but same concerns over funding, posted by WillD on Sat Jun 16 23:09:18 2012. But nothing you suggest as remediesis going to happen. Deal with the hand you are dealt.As far empty reverse peak #7's heading to/from Seacucus, think of the waste of deadhead miles most NJT trains will have to go through in having to get out of NYPS-South to some place. NJT has 200+ bus lines. There is a big difference between the Newark based locals which are to get the axe, and the 12 Cruiser routes that make money. Again, you have no patience with marketing data, and no clue as to what to do with the Lincoln Tunnel XBL situation which handles twice as many passengers as the North River tunnel, and far closer to bursting at the seams, and pissing away $15B at Gateway isn't going to do much about it. Whether you like it or not, NJT is actually way ahead of you, is rebuilding the Uptown Bus Terminal, got an FTA grant to add bus bays at Secaucus, and will be diverting some Bergen XBL buses to Secaucus. |
|
|
|