|
|
| Hillary Clinton (975698) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (975703) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 10:16:16 2012, in response to Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 10:11:19 2012. The question is does she want to do it? The answer right now is no. She has stated she wants to work alongside Bill. She certainly has the connections to make the Global Initiative into a powerhouse world-shaping organization.Could it change, not likely. She'll be 69 in 2016. I doubt she'll be interested. |
|
|
| (975712) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Sat Aug 18 10:28:44 2012, in response to Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 10:11:19 2012. Well, just speaking statistically, if any of your individual assumptions fails, the entire proposition fails. So you would need to defend each data point, not to mention the 30% Romney assumption.Nevertheless, I love Voodoo Statistics. Good going. |
|
|
| (975719) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 10:36:11 2012, in response to Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 10:11:19 2012. Noooo because Mitt Romney will be the 45th President. |
|
|
| (975727) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 10:46:55 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by SLRT on Sat Aug 18 10:28:44 2012. The 30% for Willard is the remainder from the 70% probability the President wins re-election in the fall.Given that Willard is 65 now and probably won't be interested in running again and will never be President of the United States anywhere in the Presidential progression, how does that figure into the calculation? |
|
|
| (975744) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Aug 18 11:13:52 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 10:36:11 2012. Got a WayBak Machine Steve? You can see the future? |
|
|
| (975755) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 11:50:05 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Aug 18 11:13:52 2012. Stick to cartoons, dandy dan. You're not ready for the adult discussions yet. |
|
|
| (975759) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Aug 18 11:58:36 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 11:50:05 2012. HA! HA!! You and I are probably both children of the postwar baby boom. |
|
|
| (975763) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 12:03:44 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Aug 18 11:58:36 2012. Yeah we're likely the same age - similarity ends |
|
|
| (975783) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Sat Aug 18 13:21:21 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 10:46:55 2012. Ask AIM. |
|
|
| (975784) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 13:23:50 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by SLRT on Sat Aug 18 10:28:44 2012. Well, just speaking statistically, if any of your individual assumptions fails, the entire proposition fails.Well, yes. In the 30% event that Mitt wins this year, the rest is irrelevant. That's why I multiply the probabilities. I am saying there's a 65% probability she won't be the 45th President. This is probability theory, not statistics. |
|
|
| (975787) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 13:25:31 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 10:36:11 2012. You can reduce Obama's probability of winning and make Mitt come out ahead of Hillary, sure. But Mitt isn't at 100%. |
|
|
| (975794) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by DAND124 on Sat Aug 18 13:30:33 2012, in response to Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 10:11:19 2012. 1) you're underestimating Biden's chances of being nominated(the last time a sitting vice president failed to win his party's nomination was 1952)2) i think Paul Ryan will be the overwhelming favorite to win the GOP nomination. |
|
|
| (975801) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 13:36:05 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by DAND124 on Sat Aug 18 13:30:33 2012. Biden is very unlikely to try. He'll be 76 in 2016. |
|
|
| (975811) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 13:43:24 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by DAND124 on Sat Aug 18 13:30:33 2012. 1) Do we know he wants to go for it? Little early to think about it, IMO.2) Ryan will be discredited by then, and the demographics shift to the Democrats will be ramping up by then. He won't stand a chance. |
|
|
| (975812) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Aug 18 13:43:42 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by DAND124 on Sat Aug 18 13:30:33 2012. Biden's day has come and gone. He's too old as AlM points out, and someone like you, should already know.(the last time a sitting vice president failed to win his party's nomination was 1952) America is a much different place today, compared to 1952. 2) i think Paul Ryan will be the overwhelming favorite to win the GOP nomination. Which may be why Romney picked him. Knowing he'll lose this year, Paul Ryan is being groomed for 2016 when the GOP may have a better chance. |
|
|
| (975814) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Aug 18 13:44:00 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by DAND124 on Sat Aug 18 13:30:33 2012. Biden's day has come and gone. He's too old as AlM points out, and someone like you, should already know.(the last time a sitting vice president failed to win his party's nomination was 1952) America is a much different place today, compared to 1952. 2) i think Paul Ryan will be the overwhelming favorite to win the GOP nomination. Which may be why Romney picked him. Knowing he'll lose this year, Paul Ryan is being groomed for 2016 when the GOP may have a better chance. |
|
|
| (975821) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 13:47:42 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 13:43:24 2012. Foe a person who had too much to do today to discuss cats and family pets, you seem to have suddenly found some free time. What's your cat's name? |
|
|
| (975825) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 13:50:43 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Aug 18 13:43:42 2012. Your #2 is quite possibly plan "B" for the republicans |
|
|
| (975828) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Aug 18 13:55:13 2012, in response to Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 10:11:19 2012. LuchAAA is probably right.The Democrats are the party of feminists/minorities/homosexuals/pseudo-intellectuals. They gave America the "First Black President" and now they're obligated to give America anything but another white male Christian. "First female". "First Latino". Those sound good. It's all the Democrats have to fire up their base. Race/gender/ethnicity. It's all they have to go on. |
|
|
| (975878) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Sat Aug 18 14:44:12 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 10:16:16 2012. Bill will be "69-ing" forever!!! |
|
|
| (975904) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Avid Reader on Sat Aug 18 16:24:01 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Elkeeper on Sat Aug 18 14:44:12 2012. Hawwwwwwwwwk-tooooooooie! |
|
|
| (975917) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Aug 18 17:01:08 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 13:36:05 2012. 73. He'd be 74 by the time he'd be inaugurated. |
|
|
| (975921) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Aug 18 17:08:46 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sat Aug 18 13:50:43 2012. That would be fantastic! :) |
|
|
| (975923) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 17:10:03 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by AlM on Sat Aug 18 13:36:05 2012. Oops, yes, born Nov 20, 1942. |
|
|
| (976415) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sun Aug 19 19:26:19 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 10:16:16 2012. Well, the last time a 69 year old ran for POTUS, worked out pretty well for him How it worked out for the rest of us is up to you to decide. :) |
|
|
| (976416) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sun Aug 19 19:27:12 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sat Aug 18 10:46:55 2012. He's that old?!? Thought he was in his 50s. |
|
|
| (976426) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 19:52:38 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Sun Aug 19 19:27:12 2012. Grecian Formula strikes again. |
|
|
| (976428) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Aug 19 19:55:22 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 19:52:38 2012. And what do you use on your hair - Sherwin-williams? |
|
|
| (976432) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 20:00:19 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sun Aug 19 19:55:22 2012. At least I have hair. |
|
|
| (976433) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Aug 19 20:04:53 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 20:00:19 2012. But do the drapes match the carpet? Forget that - I really don't need to know that much. Are you saying that Mitt Romney doesn't have hair? |
|
|
| (976435) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 20:09:58 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sun Aug 19 20:04:53 2012. Where di dthat cme from?I said he dyes his hair. Of couse he has to have hair to dye it. You,not so much. |
|
|
| (976437) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Aug 19 20:14:08 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 20:09:58 2012. Actually, I have a full head of hair that I prefer to keep short in the summer to facilitate my summer activities. I've also been seen with a beard at times during my life. But now back to you! You commented on Mitt Romney using Grecian Formula as if there were an issue with hair coloring. I asked you what you use. You have yet to answer. |
|
|
| (976438) | |
Re: Hillary Clinton |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 19 20:15:35 2012, in response to Re: Hillary Clinton, posted by Train Dude on Sun Aug 19 20:14:08 2012. I don't use anything. |
|
|