Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

 

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >  

(60700)

view threaded

OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I know Hurricane Ophelia hasn't hit land yet, but why waste time?

Lets get started.

Post a New Response

(60702)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Sep 14 15:02:41 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
BITE ME

Post a New Response

(60705)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:05:18 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Sep 14 15:02:41 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I would, but then you'd blame Bush for that too!

Post a New Response

(60706)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Sep 14 15:07:50 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Not another one.

Post a New Response

(60711)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by UWS Greg on Wed Sep 14 15:16:00 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Well, if you want the truth, we should blame Ophelia on the deceased Mayor Lindsey. I'm sure that's what they'll say in Queens.

Post a New Response

(60713)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 15:18:25 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d






















































. . .to you too!


Post a New Response

(60718)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 15:49:06 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Sep 14 15:07:50 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Ayup, it's another one.

Ophelia is a name that should be reserved for fat ladies, anyway.

Post a New Response

(60719)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 15:53:47 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Oh, cool! I'll repeat the same boring thing Newkirk did, for the heck of it.
























Frankly, I don't see the point in repeating it over....and over.... and over....

On the plus side, at least you gave Mitch a second chance before going "B7, B7". He still trolled.

Post a New Response

(60726)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by mr_brian on Wed Sep 14 16:06:57 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You're not funny.

Post a New Response

(60728)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 16:10:56 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by mr_brian on Wed Sep 14 16:06:57 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
While I disagree, what Mitch45 posted IS flamebait, and several people in here don't like it, so.... Mitch45, would you mind posting something more constructive, please? thanx.

Post a New Response

(60731)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:13:51 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Geez..You don't give up,do you?

Posting flamebait is lowbrow in the least..and stupid at worst.

Please resist the temptation in the future.

Post a New Response

(60733)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:15:12 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 15:49:06 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
or JUICY LADIES WITH BIG THIGHS...

Post a New Response

(60738)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 16:17:57 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:13:51 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I admit to being tempted to troll myself and post flamebait, and I've succumbed quite a few times. So, no, Mitchie boy, you're not alone. Ummm..... maybe I shoulda worded that last sentence a bit differently.

Post a New Response

(60740)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 16:18:44 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 16:10:56 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Pot
Kettle
Black

Post a New Response

(60743)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Sep 14 16:19:47 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by UWS Greg on Wed Sep 14 15:16:00 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Well, if you want the truth, we should blame Ophelia on the deceased Mayor Lindsey. I'm sure that's what they'll say in Queens.


Only if the rain doesn't get plowed. Then, it might be a conspiracy involving Lindsay and Michael Bilandic.

Post a New Response

(60744)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 16:20:56 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 16:18:44 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No, it's a case of the kettle calling the pot black this time around.

Post a New Response

(60746)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 16:23:21 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Sep 14 16:19:47 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Let's blame Ophelia on George Warrington! Overcrowded trains and falling wires did it!

Post a New Response

(60751)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 16:36:12 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 16:17:57 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I admit to being tempted to troll myself and post flamebait,

Tempted? I don't know which is worse, Mitch45's racial posts or your dull, trivial nonsense.

Post a New Response

(60759)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by American Pig on Wed Sep 14 16:54:27 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 15:53:47 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
What was the point of this?

Post a New Response

(60761)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:56:16 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by American Pig on Wed Sep 14 16:54:27 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Thats the point...

There IS no point.

Post a New Response

(60766)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 17:22:35 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:56:16 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Exactly.

Post a New Response

(60767)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 17:30:16 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 17:22:35 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They were talking about YOU!

Don't deflect criticism to somewhere else when you are in the wrong.

Out of every 100 posts you put up in these 3 boards combined, I would say only 3 or 4 are worth looking at.

Post a New Response

(60769)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 17:38:49 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 17:30:16 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Hey. Misquoting me again, eh? I was talking about your post having no point, whereupon American Pig wondered what the point was, Vengence said there was no point - which is EXACTLY what I said. Hence the one-word post.

As for only a minority of my posts being worth looking at: most of my posts are made as part of a CONVERSATION. somone says something, someone else says something back, and so forth. It's best to view this message board threaded, In My Honest Opinion. Because posts are part of a conversation and not the whole picture, read the posts that replied to my post, the posts that led up to my post, and some part of the overall conversation. The act of conversation is why so many of my posts are short and/or bland - these posts aren't meant to stand alone.

Post a New Response

(60770)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 17:42:56 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:15:12 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I think Ophelia Frump on The Addams Family, who was the twin sister of Morticia Addams, was also played by the late Carolyn Jones, and she was quite thin (as everyone who saw the show knows).

Post a New Response

(60771)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Fred G on Wed Sep 14 17:44:07 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 17:42:56 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I went to school with a girl named Ophelia Legg.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(60772)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 17:44:35 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 17:38:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
This is a place to post messages that should contain one of the following:

1. A question to ask.

2. Answering what was asked in 1 (see above)

3. An announcement

4. A piece of information, it could be an event, an incident or a newsworthy item. Facts, not fiction, should be used.

5. Someone who is new to the boards, and is saying hello for the first time.

There are other instances, but I am not moderator nor I would want to be one. However this is not a chat group, if you want conversation then there are plenty of chatrooms for that.

Post a New Response

(60775)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 17:45:36 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 16:15:12 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Damm, bro!

I have some good company! 8-)

Post a New Response

(60777)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 17:58:30 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 17:44:35 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
There are other instances, but I am not moderator nor I would want to be one. However this is not a chat group, if you want conversation then there are plenty of chatrooms for that.

Then why is it called "Subchat"? Even "Subtalk" is a term that implies conversation when applied to a message board (even if it meant propaganda in MTA usage).

This is a place to post messages that should contain one of the following:

1. A question to ask.

2. Answering what was asked in 1 (see above)


Yes.

3. An announcement
Okay.

4. A piece of information, it could be an event, an incident or a newsworthy item. Facts, not fiction, should be used.

I slightly disagree. While factual information, events, etc, can and should be posted, I see nothing wrong with fiction so long as it's clearly labeled as fiction and not mixed with facts.

5. Someone who is new to the boards, and is saying hello for the first time.

Also, humor, kidding around, etc. are appropriate for a message board such as this one. However, bad jokes can and do annoy folks, so bad jokes should be kept to a minimum.

If I had been moderating this board, I'd have allowed SOME letting off of steam, but not to the point where idiots start calling for bans against other folks.


Post a New Response

(60783)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by ALSTOM R160A on Wed Sep 14 18:11:01 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You know what Mitch45...this is ridiculous and a waste of space.
Stop acting so childish.

Post a New Response

(60790)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by American Pig on Wed Sep 14 18:25:28 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 17:38:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I was talking about your post having no point, whereupon American Pig wondered what the point was

No. David's post had a point. Yours didn't, as usual.

Your posts aren't a part of any conversation, they're useless interjections into existing conversations, that add nothing but nuisance and never "fit in."

Post a New Response

(60795)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 18:36:34 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Sep 14 17:45:36 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Ain't NUTHIN like em!

Post a New Response

(60802)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by BrooklynQB on Wed Sep 14 18:47:51 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Sep 14 15:07:50 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
See, even conservatives hate you, Mitch45.....

Post a New Response

(60806)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Sep 14 18:50:58 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by BrooklynQB on Wed Sep 14 18:47:51 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I don't hate him, but I wished he'd stop it.

Post a New Response

(60810)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 18:53:56 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Wed Sep 14 18:50:58 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Look at how many responses he's got so far to this thread.

doesn't matter...really.

As long as he post bait someones gonna bite.

Post a New Response

(60820)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:43:34 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by American Pig on Wed Sep 14 18:25:28 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Not true. While some of my posts are for fun and are not intended to MAKE a point, others are useful posts with valid points and much commentary. Plenty of my posts are there to express my approval or disapproval of something, while others are for the asking of questions. Sometimes, I'm thinking out loud. Besides, nuisance is in the eye of the beholder.

I am sorely tempted to say "Fuck you". And you deserve it, on the grounds that you said it to me. (an eye for an eye, eh?) But I'll hold my ground on this one.... fuck....errr, (ulp) oopsie daisy. *GRINS* Umm, gotta go! lol

Post a New Response

(60821)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by American Pig on Wed Sep 14 19:45:30 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:43:34 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You can keep on making your useful posts, but much of what you post is fluff.

Post a New Response

(60824)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:47:15 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by American Pig on Wed Sep 14 19:45:30 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Fine.

Post a New Response

(60825)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:48:43 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by vengence on Wed Sep 14 18:53:56 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I bit.
American Pig also bit.
We flamed each other.

Way to go, Mitchie Troll, and fuck you very much.

Post a New Response

(60827)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:51:17 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:48:43 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I meant.... thank you very much, Fuck.... I mean Mitch. damn fruedian slips

Post a New Response

(60828)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Sep 14 19:51:47 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(60829)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:52:18 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:51:17 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Shall we reef this flame-war now?

Post a New Response

(60830)

view threaded

response to own dumb statement

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:54:08 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:51:17 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(60842)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS Mitch 45 'sFAULT!

Posted by BIE on Wed Sep 14 20:17:34 2005, in response to OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Sep 14 15:01:49 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
8-)

Post a New Response

(60843)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by BIE on Wed Sep 14 20:19:59 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 15:49:06 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Interestingly enough, the shelter for women with eating disorders in Syracuse is called Ophelia's Place.

Post a New Response

(60844)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS Mitch 45 'sFAULT!

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 20:20:46 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS Mitch 45 'sFAULT!, posted by BIE on Wed Sep 14 20:17:34 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL

Post a New Response

(60858)

view threaded

I think Richard should get his own TV show...

Posted by BrooklynQB on Wed Sep 14 20:42:53 2005, in response to response to own dumb statement, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:54:08 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Seriously, I'm not poking fun at Mr Rainbowitz, but some of this stuff is too wierd to not be shared. I'll be his agent and maybe Pigs can do the casting and Terripan Station edits and spellchecks the scripts. Anyone on board?

Post a New Response

(60859)

view threaded

Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Sep 14 20:45:48 2005, in response to Re: OPHELIA: ITS BUSH'S FAULT!, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 15:49:06 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d

Quote:
Ophelia is a name that should be reserved for fat ladies

Guess you haven't read Hamlet . . .

Post a New Response

(60862)

view threaded

Re: response to own dumb statement

Posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Sep 14 20:46:57 2005, in response to response to own dumb statement, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 19:54:08 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Nobody likes a bandwidth thief.

Post a New Response

(60865)

view threaded

Re: I think Richard should get his own TV show...

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 20:49:00 2005, in response to I think Richard should get his own TV show..., posted by BrooklynQB on Wed Sep 14 20:42:53 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
(shrugs)

Post a New Response

(60867)

view threaded

Re: I think Richard should get his own TV show...

Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 20:50:10 2005, in response to Re: I think Richard should get his own TV show..., posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Wed Sep 14 20:49:00 2005.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL. Me? A television show? LMAO

Post a New Response

[1 2 3]

 

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]