|
|
| Re: St. Pat's For All Parade (573683) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 6 of 8 |
||
|
| (574483) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 21:05:31 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Dan Lawrence on Tue Mar 9 21:04:07 2010. Terrapin never showed proff. Luch will likely do likewise. |
|
|
| (574484) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Mar 9 21:06:42 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Mar 8 18:21:13 2010. PROFF? |
|
|
| (574486) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 21:08:34 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Dan Lawrence on Tue Mar 9 21:04:07 2010. You just asked for me to be banned, which is proof enough. |
|
|
| (574488) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 21:10:23 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Mar 8 18:14:56 2010. Your obsession with Beck has come to this. You really would have been better off not telling the wifey where you post. |
|
|
| (574493) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 21:14:29 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Mar 8 18:21:13 2010. Hey moron, I'm not a homophobe. I'm against the PC police trying to impose their will on everyone else. That's the argument here. I'm not knocking gays or saying they should not have their own parade. But you're so high on your own sense of self-importance, you can't see it. |
|
|
| (574501) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 21:23:56 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 21:10:23 2010. Heh. Consider it my personal payback. :)And she comes here to chill out. This place is kindergarten compared to her usual haunts. Besides ... folks were complaining that there were no wimmen here. Your wish has been granted. Heh. |
|
|
| (574506) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 21:29:27 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 21:23:56 2010. Payback for what? |
|
|
| (574510) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 21:32:25 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 21:29:27 2010. Heh. Worship of the transistor radio by too many. :) |
|
|
| (574522) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 21:51:36 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 18:50:04 2010. I don't respond to most of his nonsense, especially when he has 245 posts with Family Guy in it, but since you mentioned it, to put Reverend Wright or Sharpton up on the level of Martin Luther King Jr is an insult to King. |
|
|
| (574524) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 21:53:15 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:55:50 2010. I have no respect for Rev Al, or Rev Wright, that's why I put it in quotes. They are insults to reverends. |
|
|
| (574525) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 21:54:13 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 21:32:25 2010. We could go back to the transistor minicomputer . . . |
|
|
| (574529) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 21:57:32 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 21:51:36 2010. If anything Reverends Wright and Sharpton are a pair of King wannabees. |
|
|
| (574532) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 22:02:29 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 21:54:13 2010. I wonder how long before someone comes out with Dick Tracy type wrist computers? |
|
|
| (574533) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 22:02:38 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 21:54:13 2010. Nah ... only picks up Deutsche Welle ...
|
|
|
| (574539) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 22:07:26 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 22:02:29 2010. Already been done, back in 2002 ... click pic for article.
|
|
|
| (574541) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 22:08:02 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 21:57:32 2010. {robably, but Not even close. |
|
|
| (574547) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 22:11:07 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 22:07:26 2010. I heard something about it a while ago.But you had to carry some of the hardware on your arm. Not just something that you just wore on your wrist. |
|
|
| (574600) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 22:53:27 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 22:11:07 2010. Looked into it, and the Seiko unit was just what was shown in the photo. Some earlier toys required a whole belt. :) |
|
|
| (574612) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 23:15:44 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 22:53:27 2010. I'll wait for the consumer reports article about it. |
|
|
| (574624) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 23:26:49 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 23:15:44 2010. Gonna be a long wait ... the product bombed. :) |
|
|
| (574632) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Mar 9 23:33:31 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 23:26:49 2010. No wonder why I haven't heard anything sine it was announced. |
|
|
| (574649) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Mar 9 23:54:18 2010, in response to St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Mar 8 16:58:48 2010. It's not really for all. They deliberately discriminate against vampires by holding the parade during the day! |
|
|
| (574697) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 04:32:31 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 9 14:42:28 2010. How in God's name can somebody hijack a thread that they started? Lord, you're an idiot. |
|
|
| (574700) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 04:46:17 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 18:29:06 2010. lol |
|
|
| (574702) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Mar 10 05:18:06 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Mar 8 18:55:10 2010. You are reaching for straws here. Those groups you mentioned are NOT straight groups. They have nothing whatsoever to do with sexual orientation. The VFW and NYPD band are groups that celebrate and have pride in having sex with the opposite sex???????? C'mon now. |
|
|
| (574710) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Wed Mar 10 06:22:37 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Mar 10 05:18:06 2010. Those groups you mentioned are NOT straight groups. They have nothing whatsoever to do with sexual orientation. The VFW and NYPD band are groups that celebrate and have pride in having sex with the opposite sex???????? C'mon now.I think what he meant was that groups like the VFW and the NYPD Band, while technically orientation-neutral are usually not associated with the pro-LGBT agenda and are rightfully or wrongly publicly percieved to be on the opposite side of the debate but yet they partecipate in the Pride parade. |
|
|
| (574713) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Mar 10 06:59:18 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Mar 8 18:55:10 2010. Actually, a great many straight groups can and do march in the annual Heritage Of Pride March down Fifth Avenue each June. Among these are the VFW, the NYPD Band, the FDNY, 1199, and the TWU (!).Yeah so, none of them are marching as a sexual orientation part of the parade. Them marching has nothing to do with "being straight". the PFLAG (Parents And Friends of Lesbians And Gays) I would think so...it's a gay pride parade!! In addition, major corporations such as Delta Airlines, AVIS, Coca-Cola, and Bank Of America send large contingents to march in this, the largest LGBT parade in the world. So what? It could be the largest or the smallest gay parade in the world, what does that have to do with a parade that's one of the largest St Patricks day parades, which has absolutely nothing to do with sexual orientation of any of the marchers? No one in that parade is marching under the banner, "Hey I am straight", it has nothing to do with sexual orientation. |
|
|
| (574735) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Mar 10 08:46:13 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Mar 8 23:22:22 2010. I suppose this man, beaten without provocation as he left a gay party in a Brooklyn bar, was a "bitch boy" who was "disruptive" and "trying to destroy America" merely by being a gay man.Were you in Brooklyn on the night of March 2, Luch? |
|
|
| (574787) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 11:17:23 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 04:46:17 2010. I'll take that as a yes. |
|
|
| (574796) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by docstox on Wed Mar 10 11:36:00 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by streetcarman1 on Tue Mar 9 12:05:56 2010. Sorry for the lateness of this reply.I'm often away from a computer helping out my elderly mom (she has no computer).You are absolutely correct in saying that about the heterosexual lifestyle.You are also very correct in saying we are all sinners.However, if your religious faith tells you something is sinful, you have to call it out and work on it.Believe me, I myself have a lot to work on.I am not the type of person who tells anybody my opinion, only if asked. |
|
|
| (574859) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Mar 10 12:56:54 2010, in response to St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Mar 8 16:58:48 2010. Although I support the right of the AOH to choose who should be allowed to march in their parade, I'm with Jay in agreeing that it's stupid that they block gay groups from marching as such. |
|
|
| (574910) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 10 16:19:50 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Mar 10 12:56:54 2010. So you support the AOH, and you support Jay.I'm sure that the AOH would block swingers from marching too. There is no reason for anyone to go to this parade to announce their sexuality, which is all Jay and his friends want to do. They could care less about anything else. |
|
|
| (575048) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 21:37:45 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 18:50:04 2010. "Wow, this is even more proof of your racism. All black ministers are the same, according to you?)"YOU SAY NOTHING ABOUT LUCHAAA COMMENTARY SO YOU KNOW HE IS ONE BUT YOU SAY NOTHING.....YOU'RE A BIG ASS HYPOCRITE YOU WOULDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A RACIST IS EVEN IF ONE SPAT ON YOUR FACE.....YOU TWIT! LOL..... |
|
|
| (575051) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 21:40:09 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 21:51:36 2010. ".........Reverend Wright or Sharpton up on the level of Martin Luther King Jr is an insult to King. "Is that the kind of nonsense that the priests and nuns taught you at CTK? lol.....you should ask for your tuition back....my son....request a FULL REFUND |
|
|
| (575064) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 21:58:02 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:18:03 2010. "...deserve jail time and no respect. "And what crime are you referring to? for speaking out against racism in America? is that really a crime for you? I would think racism is a real crime. |
|
|
| (575072) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:12:56 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Tue Mar 9 20:31:02 2010. "He is not entitled to the style "the Reverend". He is not an Anglican, Catholic, or Orthodox deacon or priest, and he is not the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford. The correct Protestant usage is not to use a style, but to use the titles "Mister", "Brother", "Pastor", or "Elder". "EVER HEAR OF THE REVEREND BILLY GRAHAM ? EH? oh...here is an entry from WIKIPEDIA about the word: The Reverend is a style most often used as a prefix to the names of Christian clergy and ministers. There are sometimes differences in the way the style is used in different countries and church traditions. The Reverend is correctly called a style but is often and in some dictionaries called a title, form of address or title of respect.[1][2] The style is also sometimes used by leaders in non-Christian religions such as Judaism and Buddhism.[citation needed] The term is an Anglicisation of the Latin reverendus, the style originally used in Latin documents by the Roman Catholic Church. It is the future passive participle of the verb revereri (to respect) which may be taken as a gerundive or a passive periphrastic, therefore meaning [one who is] to be respected/must be respected. The Reverend is therefore equivalent to The Hono(u)rable or The Venerable.[citation needed] It is paired with a modifier or noun for some offices in some religious traditions: e.g., Roman Catholic bishops are usually styled The Most Reverend (reverendissimus); Anglican bishops are styled The Right Reverend; some Reformed churches have used The Reverend Mister as a style for their clergy. Protestant In some countries, such as the United States, the term Pastor (such as Pastor Smith in more formal address or Pastor John in less formal) is often used rather than the Reverend or Reverend. The Reverend, however, is still often used in more formal or official written communication. The United Methodist Church in the United States often addresses its ministers as Reverend (Reverend Smith). Among Southern Baptists in the United States, Reverend is formally written but the pastor is usually orally addressed as Mister (such as Mister Smith) or, in more traditional instances, Brother (Brother Smith), as New Testament writers describe Christians as being brothers and sisters in Christ. [Mat. 12:50] |
|
|
| (575074) | |
Re:OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:16:28 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 21:05:22 2010. "Why are you defending a racist? "The REAL question is this.....why are you NOT labeling the obvious? which is Luchie is a racist.....yet you won't......you're more of a bigot for not labeling him as such.... |
|
|
| (575077) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Mar 10 22:19:43 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 21:04:10 2010. I guess that I meant Episcopalian, but Lutherans seem quasi-Catholic to me. I only went to one Lutheran service and it was a pretty old school service and more formal than most Catholic masses that I've been to. |
|
|
| (575078) | |
Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:21:03 2010, in response to Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT, posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 16:02:48 2010. R42 4820...you should be asking the little FLAMER....OLOG-HAI that question....he's pissed off at me....because I challenged him....use he reverts to labeling me as a racist....which I am not...and everyone knows it by my posts on here....yet Olog-hai says NOTHING about all the posts from LuchAAA which are so racist....it just screams of it.... |
|
|
| (575081) | |
Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:26:03 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 9 18:27:38 2010. Oh...SH!Little man...you should spend your quality time somewhere else and not in front of the PC...."trying" to attack me....and threaten me with physical VIOLENCE...yes...we all remember your infamous post.....you call me a racist ..but say nothing of the obvious racist.....LuchAAA.....you're just a facist punk. |
|
|
| (575085) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by f179dj on Wed Mar 10 22:30:22 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Easy on Wed Mar 10 22:19:43 2010. ". . . but Lutherans seem quasi-Catholic to me."To me too (a Catholic), also based on the one service I attended. The local Lutheran parish was installing a new pastor, so I thought that as a member of the PPC I should show the flag, so to speak. I felt at home (almost). Same color vestments for the church season; the epistle and gospel readings were the same as we had the following day (a verse or two longer or shorter in places); and the presiding Bishop was fully vested, mitred, and with a crosier. What floored me was that at communion, which I declined, they announced that they believe in the "true presence." |
|
|
| (575088) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:42:52 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by f179dj on Wed Mar 10 22:30:22 2010. "What floored me was that at communion, which I declined, they announced that they believe in the "true presence."From Wikipedia: Different understandings Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians see the Real Presence in terms not of a physical or "carnal" presence, but of transubstantiation/metousiosis.[1] Anglicans generally argue for contentment with the mode of objective presence to remain a mystery. Lutherans expound a presence "in, with and under the forms" of bread and wine. Methodists postulate the par excellence presence as being a "Holy Mystery". Reformed Protestant views instead speak of a "spiritual" real presence and stress that Holy Communion is a "spiritual feeding". Certain other Protestant traditions (for instance, Baptists and contemporary evangelicals) simply reject outright the doctrine of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Lutherans - the Sacramental Union: "in, with, and under the forms of bread and wine" Lutherans believe that the Body and Blood of Christ are "truly and substantially present in, with and under the forms" of the consecrated bread and wine (the elements), so that communicants eat and drink the Holy Body and Blood of Christ Himself as well as the bread and wine (cf. Augsburg Confession, Article 10) in this Sacrament. The Lutheran doctrine of the Real Presence is more accurately and formally known as "the Sacramental Union." It has been inaccurately called "consubstantiation." This term is specifically rejected by some Lutheran churches and theologians since it creates confusion about the actual doctrine, and it subjects the doctrine to the control of an abiblical philosophical concept in the same manner as, in their view, does the term "transubstantiation." The Apology of the Augsburg Confession describe the real presence in terms of "transformation". For Lutherans, there is no Sacrament unless the elements are used according to Christ's institution (consecration, distribution, and reception). This was first articulated in the Wittenberg Concord of 1536 in the formula: Nihil habet rationem sacramenti extra usum a Christo institutum ("Nothing has the character of a sacrament apart from the use instituted by Christ"). Some Lutherans use this formula as their rationale for opposing in the church the reservation of the consecrated elements, private masses, the practice of Corpus Christi, and the belief that the reliquæ (what remains of the consecrated elements after all have communed in the worship service) are still sacramentally united to the Body and Blood of Christ. This interpretation is not universal among Lutherans. The consecrated elements are treated with reverence; and, in some Lutheran churches, are reserved as in Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Anglican practice. The external Eucharistic adoration is usually practiced by most Lutherans except for bowing, genuflecting, and kneeling to receive the Eucharist from the Words of Institution and elevation to reception of the holy meal. The reliquæ traditionally are consumed by the celebrant after the people have communed, except that a small amount may be reserved for delivery to those too ill or infirm to attend the service. In this case, the consecrated elements are to be delivered quickly, preserving the connection between the communion of the ill person and that of the congregation gathered in public Divine Service. Lutherans use the terms "in, with and under the forms of consecrated bread and wine" and "Sacramental Union" to distinguish their understanding of the Eucharist from those of the Reformed and other traditions. Moravians and the closely related Czech Unity of the Brethren generally agree with Lutheran teachings. European and American Lutherans are in formal and full communion with the Anglicans\ Episcopalians in their mutual agreement on the Real Presence of Christ in the Mass. |
|
|
| (575089) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 22:44:17 2010, in response to Re:OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:16:28 2010. What did he say that was racist? He might have said some bigoted things, but it and racism are not the same things.And what do you care? You're a bigger racist than he is! |
|
|
| (575090) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 22:45:20 2010, in response to Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:26:03 2010. I never threatened you with physical violence. So you're not only a racist, you're a liar. |
|
|
| (575091) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 22:45:51 2010, in response to Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:21:03 2010. What posts are racist? Besides your own, that is. |
|
|
| (575093) | |
Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 10 22:51:08 2010, in response to Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:21:03 2010. What have I said? |
|
|
| (575095) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 22:51:49 2010, in response to Re: OLOG-HAI DECLARES LUCHAAA A RACIST AND BIGOT, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 10 22:51:08 2010. Don't encourage it. It'll only come up with more lies and racism. |
|
|
| (575096) | |
Re: St. Pat's For All Parade |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:53:16 2010, in response to Re: St. Pat's For All Parade, posted by Easy on Wed Mar 10 22:19:43 2010. "I guess that I meant Episcopalian, but Lutherans seem quasi-Catholic to me."This should shed some light : From Wikipedia: "High Church Lutheranism" is the name given in Europe for the 20th century Lutheran movement that emphasizes worship practices and doctrines that are similar to those found within both Roman Catholicism and the Anglo-Catholic wing of Anglicanism. In North America the term Evangelical Catholicity is used instead. Background The terms High Church and Low Church do not originally belong to the Lutheran tradition; historically, these have been applied to particular liturgical and theological groups within Anglicanism. The theological differences within Lutheranism have not been nearly so marked as those within the Anglican Communion; Lutherans have historically been unified in the doctrine expressed in the Book of Concord. However, quite early in Lutheranism, polarities began to develop owing to the influence of the Reformed tradition, leading to so-called "Crypto-Calvinism". The Pietist movement in the 17th century also moved the Lutheran church further in a direction that would be considered "low church" by Anglican standards. Pietism and rationalism led not only to the simplification or even elimination of certain ceremonial elements[1], such as the use of vestments,[2] but also to less frequent celebration of the Eucharist, by the end of the era of Lutheran Orthodoxy. Unlike in the Church of England however, there has been very little iconoclasm in Lutheran churches and church buildings have often remained richly furnished. Also some monasteries continued as Lutheran after Reformation. Loccum Abbey and Amelungsborn Abbey in Germany have the longest traditions as Lutheran monasteries. In old church orders, however there was much variation which could now be described as "high church" or "low church". One example of the more Catholic ones is the Swedish Church Ordinance 1571. Agenda of the church order of Margraviate of Brandenburg (1540) contained unusually rich provision for ceremonial usages.[3] This legacy of Brandenburgian Lutheranism has later been visible in Old Lutherans' resistance to compromise in the doctrine of Real Presence. Other church orders following closely to pre-Reformation rites and ceremonies were Palatinate-Neuburg (1543, retaining a eucharistic prayer[4]) and Austria (1571, prepared by David Chytraeus).[5] As a curiosity can be mentioned, that William Augustus Mühlenberg, father of the Ritualist movement in the Episcopal Church in the United States of America, was originally Lutheran and came from a Lutheran family.[6] In Europe, after long influence of Pietism, theological rationalism and finally 19th century German Neo-Protestantism, there was developed a ground for 20th century High Church or Evangelical Catholic Movement. the terms "High Church" (Evangelical Catholic) and "Low Church" (Confessing Evangelical) began to be used to describe differences within the Lutheran tradition. However, this terminology is not characteristic of a Lutheran's identity as it often the case for an Anglican.[7]. |
|
|
| (575097) | |
Re:And what do you care? You're a bigger racist than he is! |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:56:01 2010, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 22:44:17 2010. I see now.....you mean he's a little bit and I am bigger ..lol...OK....I guess you're using your racist measuring tape tonight..lol....it won't work here...you're a BLEEDING hypocrite...and we all know it....oh...and yes...he did mention Jay's Black heritage in very CRUDE form....but you wouldn't care either way.... |
|
|
| (575100) | |
Re: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 22:58:15 2010, in response to Re:And what do you care? You're a bigger racist than he is!, posted by streetcarman1 on Wed Mar 10 22:56:01 2010. Link the post, then.And I see this time you didn't deny being racist. You can't. |
|
|
|
Page 6 of 8 |
||