|
|
| Re: Rush Limburger correct? (525262) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (525718) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 10:20:29 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 09:26:41 2009. >>>>It's the content of his program, the hatespeak,misogyny, RWNBM stuff that puts people off.<<<<Hold on there, that's luch's stock in trade.... |
|
|
| (525719) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 10:22:06 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Nov 18 02:36:37 2009. Hey, Bing Bong ain't no Democrat. Put the label gun away. |
|
|
| (525720) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 18 10:23:34 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 09:26:41 2009. RWNBM? |
|
|
| (525723) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 10:29:02 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 18 10:23:34 2009. the Revolution Will Not Be Microwaved |
|
|
| (525724) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 10:29:31 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 18 10:23:34 2009. I got as far asRight Wing Neocon? B M |
|
|
| (525725) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 10:33:41 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 10:22:06 2009. Bing Bong ain't no Democrat.Would you say Bing Bong ain't no liberal? |
|
|
| (525730) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 10:58:52 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 18 10:23:34 2009. Right Wing Nut Ball Media |
|
|
| (525731) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:00:02 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 10:29:02 2009. I hope not anyway!I posted the actual answer just above. |
|
|
| (525735) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:13:47 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 10:33:41 2009. That's a double negative, very bad form. Very bad form. |
|
|
| (525736) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 11:18:53 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:13:47 2009. LOL. |
|
|
| (525738) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:26:59 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 11:18:53 2009. Does that mean I made the list??? Does it? Does it? |
|
|
| (525740) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 11:30:49 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:26:59 2009. I don't know. I'll have to consult with Selkirk, SMAZ, and a few others. But you're definitely on your way.So are you going to listen to right-wing king Rush at noon? |
|
|
| (525747) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:36:53 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 11:30:49 2009. I'm going to go work out.No Liebag. No radio. Ipod and eBooks. |
|
|
| (525748) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 11:39:47 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:36:53 2009. Aww, and miss this. I know I stopped listening to AM radio when Musicradio WABC bit the dust, |
|
|
| (525754) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 11:54:27 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 10:29:31 2009. RightWing Neocon Bowel Movement |
|
|
| (525755) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 11:56:26 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:00:02 2009. heh, luchie gave me an idea for another meaning,Right Wing Neocon Bowel Movement |
|
|
| (525763) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 12:17:38 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 11:54:27 2009. Same difference. :-) |
|
|
| (525766) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 13:00:06 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 11:36:53 2009. you'll have to tell us all about your workout.let us know if you did cardio, weights, core, or whatever. |
|
|
| (525767) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 13:00:30 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 18 11:39:47 2009. you love that picture, don't you? |
|
|
| (525788) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 14:24:41 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 13:00:06 2009. I do a little of all of them. Usually 30 minutes on the treadmill, and then a melange of weights and core stuff.Then of course, there's yard work, which is excellent for the upper body. |
|
|
| (525832) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 18 17:12:55 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 13:00:30 2009. I dunno ... it'd be enough to scare me straight. :) |
|
|
| (525834) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 18 17:14:23 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 14:24:41 2009. Yard work? Heh. To these guys, "yard work" would be taken as pulling a few weeds ... yard work. Heh. Tell them about the downed tree you dragged over to the cut ... yard work? Heh. |
|
|
| (525835) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 17:15:29 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 18 17:14:23 2009. Ok....."Extreme Gardening" |
|
|
| (525838) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 18 17:20:03 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 17:15:29 2009. Brought to you by Husqvarna and International Harvester ... my favorite outdoor activity! :)
|
|
|
| (525839) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 17:21:18 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 14:24:41 2009. yard work is good. i'm laying off the weights for now. |
|
|
| (525844) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 17:23:45 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Fred G on Wed Nov 18 04:19:11 2009. Interesting. I'll try it. I know some experts say that you should drink a glass of water before a meal and you'll consume fewer calories. |
|
|
| (525845) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Nov 18 17:24:23 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Nov 17 22:35:20 2009. lol. Yea, Working out or Running does for another reason too.If you stop, you just automatically gain it. I think cutting back on soda is pretty big for most people alone. |
|
|
| (525849) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 18 17:35:27 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Nov 18 17:24:23 2009. The trick with the exercise/weightloss equation is to drink plenty of fluid while exercising. Your body will crave calorie replacement after exercise. After you stop, eat a small quantity of some very rich (by that I mean calorie-dense, not two Napoleons) food, trail mixes (I make my own concoction with nuts, chocolate chips and dried cherries) and then more water. The high calorie stuff knocks off the hunger, water fills the stomach and you replace 200ish calories after burning twice (at least) as much (if your workout is similar to mine, roughly 400 calories burned).Track everything you eat and all workouts. It makes it easier to decide what to eat. I have an app for that, there's plenty of software for any computer. |
|
|
| (525951) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Nov 18 20:42:07 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 18 17:20:03 2009. :) |
|
|
| (526094) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 19 06:00:57 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 18 17:12:55 2009. heh |
|
|
| (526095) | |
Re: Rush Limburger correct? |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 19 06:01:11 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limburger correct?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 13:00:30 2009. not as much as you do |
|
|
| (526432) | |
Re: Der Spiegel: Obama ''Failed the World'' on Climate Change |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Nov 19 20:14:55 2009, in response to Re: Der Spiegel: Obama ''Failed the World'' on Climate Change, posted by italianstallion on Tue Nov 17 15:31:11 2009. Wait, you support Der Spiegel in attacking Obama for not being liberal enough?I thought that I was clear that I did not support this article. Get your eyes checked. |
|
|
| (526653) | |
Re: Der Spiegel: Obama ''Failed the World'' on Climate Change |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 20 08:59:36 2009, in response to Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Nov 17 16:53:04 2009. Start your own thread on Limbaugh's (unquoted) opinions, couldya? |
|
|
| (526928) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Nov 20 20:11:05 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 18 17:23:45 2009. It does a lot of good for you, although that 8 glasses a day minimum has been dismissed as baloney. Drink as much as you feel like drinking is the current wisdom.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (526933) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Nov 20 20:35:47 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Fred G on Fri Nov 20 20:11:05 2009. I wouldn't say that around the firehouse here. :)
|
|
|
| (527151) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Nov 21 05:01:54 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Nov 20 20:35:47 2009. Haha, I love my mop.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (527171) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Nov 21 08:00:05 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Fred G on Fri Nov 20 20:11:05 2009. good point.I might drink 8 glasses if it's very hot outside, and I've exercised or walked a lot. In the winter, I definitely don't drink 8 glasses. |
|
|
| (527272) | |
Re: Rush Limbaugh correct |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Nov 21 14:54:44 2009, in response to Re: Rush Limbaugh correct, posted by Fred G on Sat Nov 21 05:01:54 2009. We all do! :)
|
|
|
| (534839) | |
Re: Der Spiegel: Obama ''Failed the World'' on Climate Change |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Thu Dec 10 09:13:20 2009, in response to Der Spiegel: Obama "Failed the World" on Climate Change, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Nov 17 10:54:18 2009. Interesting position considering the source. |
|
|
| (534930) | |
Re: Der Spiegel: Obama ''Failed the World'' on Climate Change |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Dec 10 14:54:20 2009, in response to Re: Der Spiegel: Obama ''Failed the World'' on Climate Change, posted by cortelyounext on Thu Dec 10 09:13:20 2009. They seem to have reincorporated arrogance, yes . . . |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||