|
|
| Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, (265402) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 5 |
||
|
| (265498) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:30:11 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Grand concourse on Tue Nov 27 22:17:36 2007. True. |
|
|
| (265499) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:30:52 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Grand concourse on Tue Nov 27 22:22:55 2007. No way I could see that happening. He said something about BIE's board. What is that? |
|
|
| (265500) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:32:32 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 21:43:41 2007. I have trouble even following what he's saying half the time.That was half of the fun with him. Trying to keep up with him. |
|
|
| (265501) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:34:24 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by BMTLines on Tue Nov 27 19:58:29 2007. And unlike some people in here, When he'd put you down with puns and statements. |
|
|
| (265502) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:34:48 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:23:59 2007. I think I am on his bad side... |
|
|
| (265503) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:35:28 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Pablo M 201 on Tue Nov 27 22:21:39 2007. If he does, I hope many of us go there. |
|
|
| (265504) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:36:54 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:34:48 2007. I wonder how many people in here are on his bad side? |
|
|
| (265505) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:38:17 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Nov 27 22:01:48 2007. IIRC, nothing, unless posting a poll about banning someone can gat yourself banned here. |
|
|
| (265506) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:38:34 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:36:54 2007. Why do you wonder that? |
|
|
| (265507) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Tue Nov 27 22:38:44 2007, in response to if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by monorail on Tue Nov 27 17:25:38 2007. Yeah. That would suck. |
|
|
| (265508) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:39:23 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:38:17 2007. Is that all that you saw? I saw more than that. |
|
|
| (265509) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:39:48 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 21:43:41 2007. Same here. |
|
|
| (265512) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:42:20 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:36:54 2007. Probably a lot, but a lot of them made the mistake of taking him too seriously and personally, and couldn't "handle" him. I noticed that Edwards! doesn't really take him that seriously, while simultaneously being on Terrapin Station's bad side, and he still posts here. |
|
|
| (265513) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:43:13 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:39:23 2007. Yeah, I only read threads with titles that interest me, the thread that supposedly got him banned did not. |
|
|
| (265515) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:45:00 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:43:13 2007. I have no idea why he was banned, but he did have a post that was very critical of the owner of this board. |
|
|
| (265516) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Nov 27 22:49:00 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:38:17 2007. 'unless posting a poll about banning someone'go to the reef, check the thread, you can still add to the actual 'poll' |
|
|
| (265517) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Tue Nov 27 22:49:45 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Mr Mabstoa on Tue Nov 27 20:00:29 2007. Yeah I follow. Even politically he still has his own unique viewpoints which I respect more than a dittohead, for instance. You really gotta have a sense of humor to understand him and even then it can be a challenge. But wow, a terrific guy at the end of the day. I'm really shocked and disappointed he left.This whole thread starting to sound like a freaking ulergy, though. SELKIRK SHALL LIVE ON!!! :) |
|
|
| (265519) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:50:45 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:38:34 2007. It seems to me that alot of people were on his bad side.I'm just wondering who? Probably more people than we think. |
|
|
| (265520) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:55:27 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:50:45 2007. Alright then. Wonder away. |
|
|
| (265521) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:55:40 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 22:42:20 2007. He has called people idiots from time to timeas well as other choice words and phraises. How can he say that to someone unseriously? |
|
|
| (265522) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Tue Nov 27 22:56:48 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:30:52 2007. Dunno. |
|
|
| (265523) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Nov 27 22:57:53 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by monorail on Tue Nov 27 21:43:43 2007. I think that was unrelated. |
|
|
| (265524) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:58:20 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Easy on Tue Nov 27 22:55:27 2007. And I'll wait for them to chime in.This way I'm not accused of making up names. |
|
|
| (265526) | |
About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007, in response to if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by monorail on Tue Nov 27 17:25:38 2007. I generally like to stay behind the scenes here at SubChat. I operate these boards as a hobby at my expense out of my own pocket because I enjoy doing so.I do not believe in censoring the boards, but sometimes I need to send a thread or part of a thread to the reef to end bickering. I try to stay neutral, and try to keep the trimming to a minimum. One of the few times that I will delete a post rather that moving it to the reef, or locking it, is in the case where someone posts private information, or a photo of someone’s family member on the board, and I receive a request to remove it, I will honor that request, I play no favorites. I may let things go a little further in OTchat that I would in SubChat or BusChat. I have removed posts containing private information at Brian’s request, and I have deleted posts made by Brian that contained private information about other posters. Like I said I play no favorites. About the Transit Photo King of the west coast- I really liked his photos, and he had a lot to contribute to these boards. I wouldn’t mind meeting up with him when he is in town and go rail fanning with him, but I warned him several times, about KKK this and lynching that in every other post. I suspended him quite a few times and gave him many chances, told him to cool down, but he became too disruptive to these boards, and was taking up too much of my time cleaning out threads, so I had to ban him. I have no idea why Kevin thinks he has been banned, he has not been. It was he who requested that his account be canceled: http://www.subchat.com/otchat/read.asp?Id=265340 "I'll make this my last since I've sent the destruct email to cancel my account." I don't know why he's sending people emails saying he's been banned and having them ask to to reinstate his account? I've met Kevin and I think he's a cool guy. A little wacky but cool :-) "I'm phucking DONE now because Unca LARRY has no balls" Hey Unca Kev, if you're reading this, I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but why don't you grow a pair and email me, and ask to have you account re-activated yourself, if you changed your mind? (you have my email) Unca Kev, your account has been re-activated if you'd like to post. Folks, don't take this board too seriously, and think twice before posting. I'm going to sleep now, will read the responses tomorrow. |
|
|
| (265527) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 23:06:39 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Good night Larry and thanks for an objective look as to what happened today. |
|
|
| (265528) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Tue Nov 27 23:09:44 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 27 17:42:17 2007. Ahhhh, he's the leader of the foamers.Since he's married, has a OK job, a car and apartment the lesser undesirable socially inept have latched onto him like those little fish that eat crap off sharks and the sharks don't eat. Terrapins not a bad guy, just someone who always has to win at any cost. Twisting words around, speaking condescendingly to others and pretending to know it all. I wouldn't hang out with him or even touch him with a 10 foot pole but I'm cool. |
|
|
| (265533) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Tue Nov 27 23:23:22 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Sorry to see him go and thanks for clearing the various claims on this issue.So how long do we have until you shut this board down? Should we start a doomsday clock like the Bulletin of Atomic Sciencists did to provide a quantitative index for the level of immaturity and thus presumably your impatitience with our idiocy? If so where do we sit now, five to midnight?  Hopefully you can get back to your kid and deal with someone with some actual maturity. |
|
|
| (265534) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Tue Nov 27 23:39:54 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by WillD on Tue Nov 27 23:23:22 2007. It's just sad this all happened because Selkirk got into an arguement w/maybe one or two ppl here over a trivial matter about google and having to link sites.He's a good guy, I never had problems w/him and hope he does come back. |
|
|
| (265539) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Phantom909 on Tue Nov 27 23:58:53 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Grand concourse on Tue Nov 27 23:39:54 2007. The bottom line is this. Thank You Larry for all the work you do giving us railfans a forum.Joe |
|
|
| (265543) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Nov 28 00:14:25 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Phantom909 on Tue Nov 27 23:58:53 2007. Ditto. |
|
|
| (265544) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by joe c on Wed Nov 28 00:19:55 2007, in response to if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by monorail on Tue Nov 27 17:25:38 2007. Subchat doesn't feel right without SelkirkTMO here. :(i hope he comes back. til next time |
|
|
| (265545) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 28 00:20:27 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by joe c on Wed Nov 28 00:19:55 2007. Ditto. |
|
|
| (265551) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Nov 28 01:10:25 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. I didn't believe him to be bannedI think he just got fed up with a certain poster or 2 we all need a break every now and then unfortunately, that certain poster or 2, cannot take a hint as to when to chill and was wondering if he(terrapin) has ever been warned |
|
|
| (265552) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Nov 28 01:11:45 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Mr Mabstoa on Tue Nov 27 23:09:44 2007. 'I wouldn't hang out with him or even touch him with a 10 foot pole'how 'bout a 15 footer? |
|
|
| (265555) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Nov 28 01:22:19 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by monorail on Wed Nov 28 01:10:25 2007. Maybe he could have taken a chill sometimes himself. It takes two people to argue. |
|
|
| (265557) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 28 01:32:57 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. I think that's more than fair.A lot of info is publicly available these days. If you have a listed phone number in the white pages, not only can people find it on-line, but they can then find your house on Google Maps. Brian in particular set up a publicly available website called BrianAndTamar.com where a picture of him and his bride was available, as well as a street address. If he doesn't have an unlisted number, that's available too. At one time, I posted that information about him here, but Iposted nothing that was not publicly available because I obviously had no access to that. Brian posted information about me that was publicly available, and I saw no point in objecting, because, well, anybody could look it up anyway. Reaction from Larry or other posters? |
|
|
| (265559) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Nov 28 01:42:51 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 28 01:32:57 2007. I don't and wouldn't post others personal information, but I've seen stuff like that posted here a few times. Not really that often that it seems to be a problem. |
|
|
| (265560) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Nov 28 01:45:31 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Grand concourse on Tue Nov 27 22:56:48 2007. I guess that we weren't invited then. |
|
|
| (265561) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Nov 28 01:49:15 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Words well said. I think we all should thank Larry for putting up with us and giving us an outlet to express our thoughts and ideas.To Unca Selkirk, I already miss you. Please do come back. |
|
|
| (265562) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Nov 28 02:00:33 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Phantom909 on Tue Nov 27 23:58:53 2007. And busfans, don't forget them :-) |
|
|
| (265572) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 28 05:42:58 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Dan Lawrence on Tue Nov 27 21:10:21 2007. Brian calls no one names. |
|
|
| (265573) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Nov 28 06:50:09 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Very well said. I understand how time consuming and hard it is to monitorthis board and constantly keeping the flaming under control. Some subchatters just go insane after a while of being here. But hopfully, unca Selkirk will come to his senses and come back. |
|
|
| (265575) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Wed Nov 28 07:16:43 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 27 22:55:40 2007. Of course, he is being serious, but if you're serious back then you're more likely to stop posting here in one way or the other. |
|
|
| (265576) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 28 07:18:43 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Dan Lawrence on Tue Nov 27 21:10:21 2007. Larry posted he's not banned, the user account is just locked, like everything in the Reef.As many (incl. Larry) have noted, you are wrong. Selkirk requested that his account be closed. Personally, I think Kevin got the raw end of the deal. Salaam got kicked out because of his attacks on anybody that didn't agree with him. As many (incl. Larry) have noted, you are AGAIN wrong. Selkirk requested that his account be closed. He can't get the raw end of the deal when he leaves voluntarily, then insults all of SubChat, and especially the moderator, in his drama queen exit. And then he has the gall to tell you and others that he was "banned"? Kevin just does not suffer fools greatly Um, nope, wrong. Kevin suffered greatly. His apparent lack of success with using Google led him to resent the fact that I could answer many posters' questions using the wonderful website. Instead of asking for pointers, he simply made unwarranted personal attacks. Brian just calls everybody that doesn't post to his satisfaction names. Wrong again, Dan. I don't call people names, at least not as unwarranted personal attacks. The only "names" I call are "idiot" and "moron", which are not names, but facts. Both of those words have definitions, and someone who repeatedly ignores the direct advice of a learned individual on a certain subject neatly meets the definition. One person who does call names is YOU. You, Dan Lawrence, think that I am the "king of the unwarranted personal attacks", even though I make none and have showed you evidence of several individuals who each made more than one in the span of several days. Since then, you have also repeatedly posted FALSE information and refused to admit to or acknowledge your errors. Your continuing habit to disseminate blatantly false information is disgusting. Now that Selkirk and BIE are gone, who seemed to make up the bulk of your primary audience, maybe you will no longer need to impress people by posting false information. Hopefully BIE will extend you an invitation to his board so that you can post your false information there and leave this board out of it. |
|
|
| (265577) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Wed Nov 28 07:19:22 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Folks, don't take this board too seriouslyExactly. |
|
|
| (265578) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 28 07:37:25 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Dan Lawrence on Tue Nov 27 22:00:11 2007. The e-mail I got from Kevin, he was banned, or Larry blocked his posting privileges.Dan, maybe this event will help you finally see that there are some people you just shouldn't trust. That, or you have severe reading comprehension problem. Selkirk's final posts made it VERY CLEAR that he was leaving voluntarily. And in a huff. He ASKED/TOLD Larry to close his account. Do you get that??? I don't know what he wrote to you, but either he grossly misrepresented the facts for some nefarious purpose, or you grossly misunderstood what he wrote. But either way, you went against what others have said and what Selkirk himself said in his final posts and posted your blatantly false information. You have a serious quality control problem. You'd likely benefit from running your posts by several other posters first, before you post them, so that they can check for blatant errors and lies. |
|
|
| (265582) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Wed Nov 28 08:43:01 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by The Port of Authority on Wed Nov 28 02:00:33 2007. You mean the people who like the monstrosities that replaced my beloved trolleys -- I'd rather forget them ;-) |
|
|
| (265583) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Nov 28 08:44:57 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by BMTLines on Wed Nov 28 08:43:01 2007. True, busfans are a scary bunch, to be sure. |
|
|
| (265590) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Nov 28 09:37:56 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 28 07:18:43 2007. thankfully, you are not perfectas you have already stated 'The only "names" I call are "idiot" and "moron", which are not names, but facts. Both of those words have definitions, and someone who repeatedly ignores the direct advice of a learned individual on a certain subject neatly meets the definition.' therefore you also meet the requirements, you are an idiotic moron! |
|
|
| (265591) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Nov 28 09:40:28 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 28 07:37:25 2007. 'You have a serious quality control problem'he;s not the only one, after all you are not perfect, either |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 5 |
||