|
|
| Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, (265576) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 28 07:18:43 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Dan Lawrence on Tue Nov 27 21:10:21 2007. Larry posted he's not banned, the user account is just locked, like everything in the Reef.As many (incl. Larry) have noted, you are wrong. Selkirk requested that his account be closed. Personally, I think Kevin got the raw end of the deal. Salaam got kicked out because of his attacks on anybody that didn't agree with him. As many (incl. Larry) have noted, you are AGAIN wrong. Selkirk requested that his account be closed. He can't get the raw end of the deal when he leaves voluntarily, then insults all of SubChat, and especially the moderator, in his drama queen exit. And then he has the gall to tell you and others that he was "banned"? Kevin just does not suffer fools greatly Um, nope, wrong. Kevin suffered greatly. His apparent lack of success with using Google led him to resent the fact that I could answer many posters' questions using the wonderful website. Instead of asking for pointers, he simply made unwarranted personal attacks. Brian just calls everybody that doesn't post to his satisfaction names. Wrong again, Dan. I don't call people names, at least not as unwarranted personal attacks. The only "names" I call are "idiot" and "moron", which are not names, but facts. Both of those words have definitions, and someone who repeatedly ignores the direct advice of a learned individual on a certain subject neatly meets the definition. One person who does call names is YOU. You, Dan Lawrence, think that I am the "king of the unwarranted personal attacks", even though I make none and have showed you evidence of several individuals who each made more than one in the span of several days. Since then, you have also repeatedly posted FALSE information and refused to admit to or acknowledge your errors. Your continuing habit to disseminate blatantly false information is disgusting. Now that Selkirk and BIE are gone, who seemed to make up the bulk of your primary audience, maybe you will no longer need to impress people by posting false information. Hopefully BIE will extend you an invitation to his board so that you can post your false information there and leave this board out of it. |
|
|
|