RIP The CD 1982-2007 (205892) | |
![]() |
|
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 1 of 2 |
![]() |
(205892) | |
RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007 EMI, the third largest music company has decided to sell high-quality non-copy-protected tracks for slightly more than the previous copy-protected versions, with upgrades available for the price difference.NY Times article, announcing the deal. More information is available in an Apple press release, where we find out that “high-quality” means 256Kbps AAC, at least for iTunes, which really is equivalent to the original. iTunes is first, but if you don’t like Apple, look for the other music sellers to follow quickly, and then you can choose whether you like AAC, WMA, OGG, MP4 or MP3 (which although it is the most widely used, does have limitations). Of course, if this takes, then Sony and BMG will follow, and the CD will die. |
|
![]() |
(205910) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 2 14:19:10 2007, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. The CD will die, but not in 2007. The format will still have considerable use for at least another decade. |
|
![]() |
(205911) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 14:33:29 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 2 14:19:10 2007. The format will still have considerable use for at least another decade.You may well be right about 2007, but how do you come to the conclusion about CDs being around for another decade? I can certainly see that data CDs will be in use, as they are a cheap way to send 700MB of data, though they will be eclipsed in the relatively near future by DVDs, as the costs of the blank media are now the same and DVD media is only going to get cheaper. I don’t see mass-produced music CDs lasting ten years. Vinyl records didn’t last ten years after the CD was introduced—except for very limited editions for the luddites claiming analog is best. No doubt these luddites will exist in the CD world, but I can see a very rapid fall-off from the 80 Million pressed CDs in the USA in 2006, which is a 20% decline since 2005. |
|
![]() |
(205913) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 2 14:43:05 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 14:33:29 2007. Many people are slow to drop existing technology (i.e. me, I didn't convert from tape until 1996). The MP3's biggest drawback is still it's need for a computer. |
|
![]() |
(205916) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 2 15:13:53 2007, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. What media do you think music is going to be played in cars with? Not everything's going to be connected to a computer or any kind of iPod-like device, you know.Removing copy-protection rights has not resulted in the death of any particular type of recording medium. This is a first, and unrelated to the CD per se. |
|
![]() |
(205923) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Apr 2 15:22:46 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 14:33:29 2007. My Aiwa piece of crap boombox is nearly dead (I have to put a book on top of the CD lid so it doesn't pop open when I play a CD, and I've lost the remote, and one speaker doesn't play very well).Should I put off buying a Bose Wave music system? I like classical music and jazz (ie most of the music I listen to lasts longer than 3 or 4 minutes). |
|
![]() |
(205926) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by metropod on Mon Apr 2 15:30:19 2007, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. I think the Media CD is starting to go, but CD-ROMs, CD/Rs and CD/R+Ws have some life in them. |
|
![]() |
(205929) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Mon Apr 2 15:36:35 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 14:33:29 2007. mp3 and other file formats are what casette tape was to the Vinyl. Many music listeners are still buying CDs because of the sound quality. I hope CDs stay around. mp3 sounds worse than cassette tape with its unnatural compression. Just good for listening to crappy pop. |
|
![]() |
(205934) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Mon Apr 2 16:03:52 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Wado MP73 on Mon Apr 2 15:36:35 2007. Oops! Missed that part. I'll check if I can tell the difference. I was never interested in iPods because of the sound quality.“high-quality” means 256Kbps AAC, at least for iTunes, which really is equivalent to the original |
|
![]() |
(205939) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Apr 2 16:25:06 2007, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. i prefer the MINI DISC over the CD plus you can use 2x stereomono and for speech 4x . starting to have a hard time getting blank media ! ![]() oh well my preference !! does well in converting my old reel 2 reels and 33/1-3 albums !! what about websites like ''real audio rapsody'' and then there are the rare music collectors of 1960s -1970s jazz like me [ the old blue note catalog / impulse records ] miles davis , john coltraine ..wes montgomery ( pbuh ) rip. |
|
![]() |
(205966) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Alex L. on Mon Apr 2 18:03:07 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by RonInBayside on Mon Apr 2 15:22:46 2007. You should put off buying the Bose Wave for as long as you possible can and invest in a good sound system with excellent speakers. |
|
![]() |
(205973) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:32:52 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 2 14:43:05 2007. You were way behind the technology curve. It took 6 years for CDs to outsell vinyl records and the pace of technology transfer and obsolescence is increasing.Digital Music (which will quickly outgrow MP3, which is already obsolete as a compression method) currently requires a PC but that could easily change. Look at this column which speculates that the future of Blockbuster could be Apple Video. If this happens, there could also be an iTunes physical store where you could load tunes into your iPod. I’m not going to say that this is going to happen. I’m just trying to make the point that your decade of continuing life is overblown. I would give it two years before the CD is eclipsed by other forms of music sales. |
|
![]() |
(205974) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:40:02 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by RonInBayside on Mon Apr 2 15:22:46 2007. Hah! All you need is some baling wire, duct tape, tie-wraps and velcro and you have everything!Seriously, I wouldn’t buy Bose anything. I think their products, while good, are overpriced for what they are. If your goal is just to play your CD collection, I would recommend that you look at the iTunes/iPod route. Not that I like Apple (I have a Creative Zen Vision:M) but I have to say that Apple has the easy integration part done very well, and the fact that Apple opened up the interface specs for the iPod means that you can buy just about every sort of accessory for it including external speakers and remote controls. Then you do have the one-time effort of converting (“ripping”) your CD collection to AAC, which is Apple’s variant on MP4 that it uses in iTunes. You want a bit rate >=256Kbps, which means that the files are larger but you won’t be able to distinguish the result from your original CD, as the encoding errors are below the CD noise floor. Then you can carefully pack your CDs away and never have to deal with them again. |
|
![]() |
(205975) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:41:17 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Wado MP73 on Mon Apr 2 16:03:52 2007. You can try this with any CD and your PC or Apple. You don’t have to buy an iPod.But stay away from MP3, it’s the bargain basement of encoding. Apple’s AAC, Ogg Vorbis, and even WMA are better formats. |
|
![]() |
(205976) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:42:18 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 2 15:13:53 2007. Not everything's going to be connected to a computer or any kind of iPod-like device, you know.Yet. Look at the number of aftermarket iPod kits. Look at the number of new models that are coming out with built-in iPod cradles. Extrapolate a few years. |
|
![]() |
(205977) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:43:49 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by metropod on Mon Apr 2 15:30:19 2007. … but CD-ROMs, CD/Rs and CD/R+Ws have some life in them.CD-ROMs for a while, but even now bloatware is getting such that some titles are coming on DVD-ROMs. As for ?Rs, the media costs for DVD+-Rs are the same as CD-Rs, so look for that format to die even sooner. |
|
![]() |
(205979) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:46:02 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Apr 2 16:25:06 2007. Sony hasn’t dropped the mini-disk, but it’s having a hard time in the face of flash memory and hard disk players.As for the reel to reel and vinyl tapes, get yourself a good sound card and start converting them. |
|
![]() |
(205986) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Robert King on Mon Apr 2 19:37:24 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by RonInBayside on Mon Apr 2 15:22:46 2007. Do NOT buy the Bose.Basically, what you're paying for is a so-so piece of sound equipment in some fancy packaging and a lot marketing. Just get a decent stereo receiver, a CD player and a good pair of speakers and you'll do much better for less money. -Robert King |
|
![]() |
(205987) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 19:57:19 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 2 14:43:05 2007. i.e. me, I didn't convert from tape until 1996Wow. i thought I was late - converting to CD's in 1993.... But then I went through buying CD versions of some of the tapes I liked.. |
|
![]() |
(205990) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Robert King on Mon Apr 2 20:25:31 2007, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. One of my concerns about going to medialess distribution of content is that it really opens the doors wide to abuse from the record companies etc. I have several hundred CDs and several hundred records here, along with a number of cassette and open reel tapes. I can play any of these whenever, wherever, however I want to and copy them for backups and so on with no restrictions.If things go to entirely no-physical-distribution-media electronic file transfers and DRM is brought back, we're all going to be screwed on future purchases of new music. I don't particularly trust the record companies. So far, their avoidance of fair use principles and things like the Sony rootkit fiasco has really undermined my confidence in them. Then the CD I just bought this afternoon appeared to be fine. There was no external indication of damage but when I took off the shrink wrap and opened the case for the first time, I found the fingers that grip the disc's spindle hole inside had been smashed off. Honestly, you'd think that they could at least get you the CDs you've paid for without destroying the cases - this happens so often... One advantage though of going to medialess distribution is that there would be no media to be damaged in transit... -Robert King |
|
![]() |
(205991) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by The Queen on Mon Apr 2 20:38:14 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:46:02 2007. Um, Sony has Dropped the MD format in the United States from what I have read. They continue to sell in Japan where it is a useful item. |
|
![]() |
(205992) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 20:46:16 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Robert King on Mon Apr 2 20:25:31 2007. I agree: I don’t want the media companies getting into the file format business so that they can lock things up just as they like.But I also appreciate the benefits of medialess distribution. I have seen what time and abuse can do to CDs. Personally, I take the CDs out of their jewel cases with the liner notes, put both into a sleeve and after ripping, just store them away. |
|
![]() |
(205995) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 20:50:50 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by The Queen on Mon Apr 2 20:38:14 2007. More that MD has been repositioned as “professional” with Hi-MD, so it has essentially disappeared as a consumer format. Players are, I’m sure correspondingly more expensive.Where this will go, I’m not sure, since there are plenty of recorders using flash memory. If I were in the recording business, I’d have one of those and a laptop with my favorite editing software. |
|
![]() |
(206008) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Mon Apr 2 21:25:05 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:41:17 2007. I know. I have iTunes on both my PC and Mac but I haven't used them in a long time. AAC in 128k was better than mp3 but not good enough that I would buy more music from iTMS. I'd buy CDs instead.mp3 and Napster were fun early in the days and I was mainly searching for out of print music back then. I could bear with the sound quality against having nothing. I've heard good things about Ogg Vorbis format but never tried since I've pretty much lost interest in music. I think some of the sessions I played are available at the iTMS but again, I never bothered to check. Maybe it's about time I should. |
|
![]() |
(206042) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 2 23:09:22 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 18:42:18 2007. You're jumping the gun by quite a stretch. |
|
![]() |
(206045) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 23:22:50 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 2 23:09:22 2007. Maybe, but I would bet that the jump <= 5 years. |
|
![]() |
(206051) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 3 00:31:31 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 23:22:50 2007. I don't think so. More like ≥ five years . . . |
|
![]() |
(206052) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Apr 3 00:32:08 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by RonInBayside on Mon Apr 2 15:22:46 2007. Thank you to all three (Alex, John, Robert) for your advice! |
|
![]() |
(206115) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 3 08:10:13 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 2 15:13:53 2007. The Ipod type device will become so inexpensive that it will push CD changers and even MP3-on-CD capable players out of the way. I'd say that happens within 3 years. There are already Ipod car tuners. Blaupunkt for instance makes them, as I'm sure all the other usual players do.your pal, Fred |
|
![]() |
(206120) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 3 09:18:52 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by Fred G on Tue Apr 3 08:10:13 2007. No way to store the CDA file format on those. People are tired of the compressed format, especially for real music instead of the noise that's being peddled today. And the desire for something permanent will always prevail . . . |
|
![]() |
(206140) | |
Re: The CD ain't dead yet |
|
Posted by JohnL on Tue Apr 3 11:43:14 2007, in response to Re: The CD ain't dead yet, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 3 09:18:52 2007. If you really think you can tell the difference (and if all you have heard is badly compressed pop music then you haven’t made a real comparison), there is the Flac format.But I would urge you to try. You can get Winamp for free, and then try encoding classical music. I have found personally that WMA at around 250-280Kbps preserves everything I can hear, including the ambience in the silences. |
|
![]() |
(206163) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 14:24:53 2007, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. Not to worry, EMI actually *PAYS* their artists from record sales and anyone who cares knows this. Compare to TimeWeenie and Viacom who've been phucking their artists since the 70's and even stealing their Tshirt sales at concerts where they claimed the artist could "recoup their production and A&R costs." AMERICAN companies will NEVER learn and in fact are ramping up their reign of terror against 13 year olds. It's a crime to phuck children UNLESS you're a record company. :(BRAVO, EMI! Just bought ten albums from you! The others can kiss my ass. |
|
![]() |
(206177) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Tue Apr 3 15:21:27 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 14:24:53 2007. We’re getting your trip details the sleuth way. How is HMV? Or was it the Virgin Megastore? |
|
![]() |
(206251) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 17:59:19 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Tue Apr 3 15:21:27 2007. Mega ... and STOP IT! Daevid Allen (GONG, Soft machine, others) is a close, personal friend of ours. but then he's an Ozzie and not a PROPER Brit anyway. Now shush ... go play with your pudding. :) |
|
![]() |
(206358) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Apr 3 22:29:17 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 20:50:50 2007. i am considering getting this CD recording unitfor my recording studio operations Marantz CDR420 CD/MP3 Portable Recorder USB connection. Hard Disk Recording. MP3 and WAV Encoding ![]() Marantz is no stranger to innovation. For decades, we've written and rewritten the book on professional field recording and we are doing it again with the new CDR420. Never before has a CD recorder been so flexible or so powerful. Record to hard disc as .WAV or .MP3. Perform cut-and-paste editing in the field. Upload to a PC through USB 2.0, or burn CDs right there in the field. Edit ID3 information and rip MP3 discs. Copy redbook or MP3/.WAV data discs. Error check and defrag the hard drive using USB and standard Windows XP disc utilities. You can even name files and access commands with a standard PS/2 keyboard. The CDR420 is the right recorder to capture and record almost any application. Recording a court proceeding? All parties walk away with a standard, non-erasable audio CD. Recording a concert? Sell CDs minutes after it ends. Need more than 80 minutes on a CD? Record and burn in MP3 mode. Need to use good mics? The CDR420 has dual XLRs with +48v phantom power. Don't have any mics? The CDR420 has one built-in. There's more, but sit back. The list is long. ? Highlights: Record to the 20GB hard disc in 44.1kHz mono or stereo as .WAV or .MP3 On-board editing CDs can be burned in standard audio format, or as a data CD Multiple MP3 bitrates WAV files can be converted to MP3 Read, display, and edit ID3 tag information from MP3 files Features: Hard Drive Recording Until now, field CD recording was a dicey proposition. Long silence between speakers? Long silence on your CD. And what if the event went long? You have the first 80 minutes, but the rest is lost, or divided among multiple discs. With the CDR420, the initial recording is made to the internal 20 GB hard drive. You can edit outsilences, put track numbers where you need them, even record long events in .MP3 format. When it's done, burn your complete audio or .MP3 disc in minutes. Extensive Audio Support Balanced XLR Mic/Line inputs Unbalanced Line Inputs (RCA) SPDIF Digital I/O Built-in Condenser Mic +48v Phantom Power Audio CD's?or Data The CDR420 has more CD-recording functionality than anything else out there. Once you're done recording and editing, you can burn your disc in standard Red-Book audio format, or as a CD-ROM data disc, with any combination of .WAV and .MP3 files. Copying Capability Because of the CDR420s unique combination of hard drive and CD recording, you can even make multiple copies of a CD in the field. Once audio is on the hard drive, burn to your hearts content. You can even make copies of audio or MP3/.WAV data. Connectivity The USB 2.0 port is more than just a way to shuttle files back and forth to your PC. You can use disc maintenance utilities from Microsoft Windows XP to keep the CDR420s hard drive in optimum shape. Defragmenting and error checking ensures that your drive is fast and reliable even with heavy use and extensive editing. You can even use a standard PS/2 keyboard to edit ID3 and other text information as well as to control functions of the CDR420 itself! Last, but not least, the CDR420 is built with longevity in mind. You can upgrade the firmware as new versions become available through CDs or USB. Audio Capability Marantz Style And what would a Marantz Professional field recorder be without a host of professional audio features? Balanced XLR mic inputs with +48v phantom power allow you to use professional microphones. If you're caught without mics, the CDR420 has one built in. A variety of filters and level control options condition your signal for the clearest audio possible and if you're not much of a technician, turn on the ALC (Automatic Level Control), and the CDR420 will do it for you. Theres also analog line I/O, and SPDIF digital I/O, and USB 2.0, allowing you to connect the CDR420 to virtually anything in the world. An internal speaker and headphone jacks offer you multiple monitoring options, and the list goes on. Outstanding in the Field And just as you'd expect, the CDR420 is rugged. Like all Marantz Professional field recorders, its designed for years of use in real-world field recording applications, and even offers a real-time clock so you can program the CDR420 to turn on, record, and then stop all unattended. Technical Info System: Hard Disk Recorder? Recording Media: 2.5 inch 20GB HDD ? Burning CD Media: CD-R/RW discs? Recording audio format: -.mp3: MPEG layer III compression? -.wav: 16 bit linear PCM ? Recording?bit rate? -.mp3: 320, 256, 160, 128,?80, 64 kbps? -.wav: 160, 128, 80, 64, 40, 32 kbps? Sampling Frequency: 44.1khZ ? Number of Channels: 2(stereo), 1(mono) ? Frequency Response: 20,0000(hz) (-0.5dB)? ? Inputs/Outputs Mic/Line In?L/R: XLR?(1:GND, 2:HOT, 3:COLD) ? Type: 1/4" TRS phone jack? Line Level: Input Sensitivity/Impedance - 500mVrms/2k ohms? Signal-to-Noise ratio (IEC-A weighted) - 80dB? Total Harmonic Distortion (0dB, PCM) - 0.05%? Mic Level: Input Sensitivity/Impedance - 1mVrms/2k ohms ?? Signal-to-Noise ratio (IEC-A weighted) - 60dB ? Total Harmonic Distortion (0dB, PCM) - 0.2% ? Aux In L/R: Input Sensitivity/Impedance - 1Vrms/23k ohms? ?? Signal-to-Noise ratio (IEC-A weighted) - 87dB? Total Harmonic Distortion (0dB, PCM) - 0.05%? Line Out L/R: Type-?RCA Jack Standard Level/Impedance- 1 Vrms/2k ohms ? Mix Out L/R:? Type- RCA Jack ? Standard Level/Impedance- 1 Vrms/2k ohms ? Digital In/Out:? Type- RCA Jack? Standard Output Level/Impedance- 0.5 Vp-p/75ohms? Sampling Frequency- 44.1khz ? Keyboard: PS2? USB: USB Type B ? General? Headphone Output (10% THD)- 70mW/32ohms? Speaker Output- 1.7W/8ohms ? Phantom Power- +48V, 10mA ? Power Requirement- AC100V-240V, 50/60 Hz ? Power Consumption (maximum)- 14V, 1.4A ? Dimensions (maximum)? Width: 11.0 in. (279mm)? Height: 4.0 in. (102mm) Depth: 9/0 in. (228mm) ? Weight: 5lbs, 8oz (2.5kg) ? Included Accessories? AC Adaptor, Stereo Audio Cable, User Guide Optional Accessories? Rechargeable Lead Acid? Battery System RPS420 Additional Rechargeable Lead Acid Battery Pack RB4200 Carrying Bag PRC300 Attache carrying case CA300? |
|
![]() |
(206365) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Tue Apr 3 22:59:57 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 14:24:53 2007. BRAVO, EMI!Not until they apply that to the Fab Four but that's a start and I ain't got no car. |
|
![]() |
(206370) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 3 23:15:53 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Wado MP73 on Tue Apr 3 22:59:57 2007. Not until they apply that to the Fab FourHow can they, if Michael Jackson still owns their music? |
|
![]() |
(206375) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by mambomta on Tue Apr 3 23:32:58 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 3 23:15:53 2007. How can they, if Michael Jackson still owns their music?He only has a 25% share in the catalog. |
|
![]() |
(206407) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 4 02:12:17 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by mambomta on Tue Apr 3 23:32:58 2007. Ah, that's news to me. Must've sold it off to pay his debts, because income from selling Beatles tunes to commercials (or demand thereof) was limited . . . |
|
![]() |
(206420) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Apr 4 04:37:53 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Apr 3 22:29:17 2007. Nice to be rich. |
|
![]() |
(206423) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 4 05:04:47 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Apr 4 04:37:53 2007. savin up 4 itabout $1000.oo |
|
![]() |
(206425) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Apr 4 05:08:36 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 4 05:04:47 2007. What's that? 20,000 emoty soda cans? |
|
![]() |
(206426) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 4 05:12:57 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Apr 4 05:08:36 2007. ![]() |
|
![]() |
(206515) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by JohnL on Wed Apr 4 18:17:34 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Apr 3 22:29:17 2007. Looks nice, but expensive and heavy. Plus, it has a hard drive to fail on you at an inopportune moment. Why did you choose this versus the Marantz PMD660, or PMD671? There are similar machines from other manufacturers. |
|
![]() |
(206521) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 4 19:03:06 2007, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Wed Apr 4 18:17:34 2007. i am looking at the MP3 long distance recording for some of my rarefamous speakers speeches i already have converted to mini disc some have to be pitched to differrent speeds etc .. long story there except i hae not bouight this unit as of yet however i do like its portability and can be used for remotes , long lectures etc. that i do record. i dont have to use only music cds only if you know of another portable unit i am interested maybe TEAC tascam i do won their cassette units and they have served me well all thru the 1980s -90s i also own their stereo unit of this model below amazing !! my customers like the results !! ......oh well like this unit below for mono analog remotes but uses only audio cassettes ![]() |
|
![]() |
(2013337) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Mar 17 01:42:45 2025, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. Nope; you can still buy music CDs on Amazon.Now if you want vinyl, that'll be 2˝ to 3 times as much as a CD. |
|
![]() |
(2013343) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Mon Mar 17 06:21:07 2025, in response to RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by JohnL on Mon Apr 2 12:20:20 2007. HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALOL |
|
![]() |
(2013344) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Mon Mar 17 07:40:56 2025, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 4 05:12:57 2007. This is the highlight of the whole thread. |
|
![]() |
(2013346) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007? |
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Mar 17 09:32:28 2025, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007?, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Mar 17 01:42:45 2025. I go to a record show ever year, and I'mamazed at the level of inflation during the spider-biden years. I literally watched the prices and made a comment a few years ago about it where the dealers stayed silent. |
|
![]() |
(2013347) | |
Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007 |
|
Posted by Chicagomotorman on Mon Mar 17 10:09:18 2025, in response to Re: RIP The CD 1982-2007, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Mon Mar 17 06:21:07 2025. HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE |
|
![]() |
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 1 of 2 |