|
|
| Re: $83 million (1978671) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 7 |
||
|
| (1978994) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 28 19:07:21 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 28 17:39:33 2024. No, it’s a woman whose reputation was destroyed by a man-child who thought he could get away with it. |
|
|
| (1979001) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jan 28 19:55:26 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Sun Jan 28 15:38:05 2024. He never mentioned her in a speech nor disparaged her to the press. |
|
|
| (1979009) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Sun Jan 28 21:11:04 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 28 08:47:03 2024. You're welcome. |
|
|
| (1979038) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 29 12:59:02 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Sun Jan 28 18:36:28 2024. The answer is TDS |
|
|
| (1979039) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 29 12:59:55 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 28 19:07:21 2024. As we're the others mentioned. But THEY got the wink-and-nod. |
|
|
| (1979042) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 29 13:03:25 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 29 12:59:02 2024. You are just blind to everything that he does. |
|
|
| (1979044) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 29 13:09:07 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 29 12:59:55 2024. Show me where the other women were slandered or libeled by Clinton or Biden. |
|
|
| (1979148) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 11:06:01 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 29 13:03:25 2024. No, I'm no fan of his, but I know TDS when I see it. They don't even hide the selective enforcement, the ridiculous punishments, etc.. |
|
|
| (1979149) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 11:07:40 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 29 13:09:07 2024. I really don't care enough to research. |
|
|
| (1979153) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 11:24:42 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 11:07:40 2024. Yes, because it didn't happen. Trump is unique. |
|
|
| (1979155) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 11:38:46 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 11:06:01 2024. What ridiculous punishments? This is the first time he’s been punished for anything, and it’s justified. |
|
|
| (1979159) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 11:55:07 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 11:38:46 2024. And it's also totally independent of the government. |
|
|
| (1979166) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 12:51:26 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 11:38:46 2024. No, it's not justified. |
|
|
| (1979167) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 12:51:57 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 11:24:42 2024. Suuure he is. |
|
|
| (1979170) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 12:56:00 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 12:51:26 2024. Yes, it is. He defamed her. |
|
|
| (1979171) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 12:56:53 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 12:51:57 2024. Yes, he is. He is just uniquely unsuited for the presidency. |
|
|
| (1979174) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 13:20:58 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 12:56:00 2024. One can look askance on the huge damages, of course. But he brought those on himself. |
|
|
| (1979178) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 13:23:57 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 13:20:58 2024. Punitive damages. They’re that high because he claims to be a billioneh. |
|
|
| (1979179) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 13:24:40 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 13:20:58 2024. He's being singled out with that amount |
|
|
| (1979180) | |
Re: $83 million, and E. Jean Carroll boasts about going “shopping” on MSNBC |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 30 13:25:39 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024. "Fishing in France" too.This is heading for a big overturn. |
|
|
| (1979181) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 13:27:50 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 13:24:40 2024. He brought it on himself. He boasted about how rich he was. He showed his disdain for the both the plaintiff and the court system in the jury's presence.I'd get really pissed if I thought the judge was leaning over backwards to be fair and the defendant made hundreds of audible asides disparaging the judge and the court. |
|
|
| (1979184) | |
Re: $83 million, and E. Jean Carroll boasts about going “shopping” on MSNBC |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 13:34:31 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, and E. Jean Carroll boasts about going “shopping” on MSNBC, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 30 13:25:39 2024. No, it’s not.It’s her money to do with as she wishes. |
|
|
| (1979201) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 30 14:37:28 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by The Silence on Sun Jan 28 00:16:58 2024. If Biden went around speaking the say way about someone. . . he gets a free pass. Yes, there is a double standard, and here you are denying it. Never mind denying Trump's right to free speech. |
|
|
| (1979210) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jan 30 15:51:43 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 13:23:57 2024. It appears to have been enough to shut him up. At least so far.Everyone has a price. Now we know what his is. |
|
|
| (1979232) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 17:56:23 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 13:23:57 2024. A hit job. To send a message. |
|
|
| (1979233) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 17:57:15 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 13:27:50 2024. Still, I didn't know we live in a Totalitarian State. |
|
|
| (1979234) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 17:59:50 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 17:56:23 2024. Uh, that’s exactly what defamation lawsuits are for. You’re sounding like you’ve uncovered something nefarious. |
|
|
| (1979236) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 18:01:05 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 17:57:15 2024. What makes any of this “totalitarian”? |
|
|
| (1979239) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 18:04:41 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 17:59:50 2024. ONLY to single DJT out. |
|
|
| (1979240) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 18:05:28 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 18:01:05 2024. If you disparage the Court, you can get thrown in jail (if you are a certain type) |
|
|
| (1979241) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 18:41:30 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 18:05:28 2024. Right. The Biden Administration invented the concept of contempt of court. It never existed before. |
|
|
| (1979242) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 18:59:18 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 18:04:41 2024. Because he was the one who defamed her. It’s not like there was a basis for a class action. |
|
|
| (1979243) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 18:05:28 2024. That’s been around all along. Watch My Cousin Vinny. |
|
|
| (1979244) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Jan 30 19:50:30 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 13:20:58 2024. The huge 83mil award was way out of line for a simple defamation.After all OJ only had to pay 8.5 mil to the family of Ron Goldman, and that was a murder case. Who did Trump Kill?? |
|
|
| (1979245) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 20:00:31 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Jan 30 19:50:30 2024. Trump is significantly richer than OJ Simpson (or so he claims), so the punitive damages are necessarily higher.And the wrongful death suit was about calculating the losses of the Goldman family from losing their son who would have lived for decades more, whereas Carroll’s suit was about the money she lost from the reputational damage from being accused of being a liar by a major public figure with a massive, unquestioning following. |
|
|
| (1979246) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 20:04:45 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Jan 30 19:50:30 2024. Trump is significantly richer than OJ Simpson (or so he claims), so the punitive damages are necessarily higher.And the wrongful death suit was about calculating the losses of the Goldman family from losing their son who would have lived for decades more, whereas Carroll’s suit was about the money she lost from the reputational damage from being accused of being a liar by a major public figure with a massive, unquestioning following. |
|
|
| (1979249) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 20:13:44 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Jan 30 19:50:30 2024. The huge 83mil award was way out of line for a simple defamation.Trump brought the $83 million on himself. He posed as a crude and disgusting individual in the courtroom, in contrast to the kind and generous human being he really is. He boasted of his wealth, so the jury obviously concluded higher punitive damages were needed to make a difference. |
|
|
| (1979259) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:23:05 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 18:59:18 2024. NO one else would have been sentenced such a big amount |
|
|
| (1979260) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:23:59 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 18:41:30 2024. Noooo.... |
|
|
| (1979261) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:25:05 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2024. I'm aware. My issue isn't that he has to pay,my issue is that noone else would |
|
|
| (1979262) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:26:09 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Tue Jan 30 20:13:44 2024. Still uncalled for |
|
|
| (1979263) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:26:25 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Tue Jan 30 19:50:30 2024. Exactly. TDS |
|
|
| (1979265) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 21:53:54 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:23:05 2024. No one was “sentenced.”And no one else would have been ordered to pay so much in punitive damages because no one else is that rich. Is the concept of “punitive damages” that fucking hard to understand? |
|
|
| (1979266) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 21:54:22 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:25:05 2024. We were talking about contempt of court. |
|
|
| (1979267) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 21:54:40 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:26:09 2024. Absolutely called for. |
|
|
| (1979270) | |
Re: $83 million, and E. Jean Carroll boasts about going “shopping” on MSNBC |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Jan 31 00:41:45 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, and E. Jean Carroll boasts about going “shopping” on MSNBC, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jan 30 13:34:31 2024. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1979271) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jan 31 01:00:37 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:25:05 2024. My issue isn't that he has to payWhy? And who said he has to? |
|
|
| (1979279) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Wed Jan 31 02:01:14 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:25:05 2024. Most people know how to keep their damn mouth shut and let the lawyers do the talking. |
|
|
| (1979283) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Jan 31 04:41:20 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:23:05 2024. LOL at "sentenced." Are you ignorant of the law or just play that on TV?If Jeff Bezos had behaved the way Trump behaved, he would have been assessed similar punitive damages. |
|
|
| (1979284) | |
Re: $83 million |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Jan 31 04:42:18 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jan 30 21:23:59 2024. But that's the only way what you stated could have been true. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 7 |
||