| Re: Arthur Engoron (1956294) | |
|
|
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
| (1957911) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by pragmatist on Sat Oct 7 11:31:26 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 7 11:06:05 2023. As much as people like to say that, it just does not reflect the history of law enforcement in the US. Harassment of people for a wide range of beliefs has occurred in this country over and over by whoever is in power. If you think it is something new, or the bailiwick of one party, you are missing much of US history. |
|
| (1957912) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by pragmatist on Sat Oct 7 11:42:01 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 7 11:29:41 2023. It also has little to do with the function of law enforcement, whose job is to arrest and/or prosecute people they think are guilty. The jury is supposed to presume innocence, but certainly not the prosecution. |
|
| (1957914) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by chicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 7 11:57:36 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 7 09:47:34 2023. iawtlp. Big time |
|
| (1957915) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by chicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 7 12:04:45 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 7 09:00:37 2023.
|
|
| (1957916) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by chicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 7 12:04:47 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 7 09:00:37 2023.
|
|
| (1957919) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 7 12:15:58 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by pragmatist on Sat Oct 7 11:42:01 2023. So what you and S-P are saying is the process can be unfair or corrupted and still be okay in your mind? |
|
| (1957926) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by pragmatist on Sat Oct 7 12:44:10 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 7 12:15:58 2023. That's not what I said. I said there is a long history in the US of targeting people for a long list of reasons. This practice has gone on for much of the history of this country. That being the case, it doesn't change whether someone is or is not guilty of what they are charged with in any particular case. And even if one is not ok with a process, sometimes people are happy with the result. If the police and/or DA fudge the evidence so they get a conviction of someone who is guilty, but maybe the evidence is a bit weak most folks wouldn't bat an eyelash. And if he got out on appeal the same folks could not be happy. That's the real world. In my opinion - Yes, Trump is targeted, and Yes, Trump is dirty. If he wasn't targeted, he'd still be dirty. |
|
| (1957938) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 7 14:42:40 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by pragmatist on Sat Oct 7 12:44:10 2023. I think if you read back, i was not responding to that post that you seem to be referencing. |
|
| (1957960) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 7 16:11:31 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 7 12:15:58 2023. I’m specifically saying that the presumption of innocence only applies in a specific circumstance that’s inapplicable here, not that it would justify any bias. |
|
| (1958219) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by Chicagomotorman on Mon Oct 9 09:29:06 2023, in response to Arthur Engoron, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Sep 26 17:05:51 2023.
|
|
| (2022491) | |
Arthur Engoron violated Eighth Amendment |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 22 04:15:41 2025, in response to Arthur Engoron, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Sep 26 17:05:51 2023. All over the news. |
|
| (2045048) | |
Re: Arthur Engoron violated Eighth Amendment |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 31 15:25:44 2026, in response to Arthur Engoron violated Eighth Amendment, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 22 04:15:41 2025. bump |
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||