Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 4

Next Page >  

(1971814)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Fri Dec 15 15:59:25 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by rkba on Fri Dec 15 12:05:23 2023.

I think bingbong would love to get knocked up just so she could say that had an abortion

Post a New Response

(1971815)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Fri Dec 15 16:01:24 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by rkba on Fri Dec 15 12:05:23 2023.

I think bingbong would love to get knocked up just so she could say that had an abortion

Post a New Response

(1971816)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Fri Dec 15 16:01:29 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by rkba on Fri Dec 15 12:05:23 2023.

I think bingbong would love to get knocked up just so she could say that had an abortion

Post a New Response

(1971818)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by AlM on Fri Dec 15 16:38:33 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Easy on Fri Dec 15 15:18:19 2023.

If so, and even if not, I think that ridiculing someone else's opinion without qualifying your own leaves you open to interpretation.

So who does that here?



Post a New Response

(1971881)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sat Dec 16 18:02:08 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 15 13:20:55 2023.

When Roe V Wade was made law by the Supreme Court back on January 22, 1973, the was mandated that an abortion of a fetus was legal DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER of a pregnancy, but the pro-abortion activists kept pushing for more even, strangely some were calling for it up to the birth of a child....The anti abortionists reacted and made plans to get RVW overturned. Solution: An abortion for the first trimester and then done, finished and completed. That would seem the fairest way to me so long as women do not use this method for birth control. Two abortion and after that tough shit ladies.

Post a New Response

(1971882)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sat Dec 16 18:02:20 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 15 13:20:55 2023.

When Roe V Wade was made law by the Supreme Court back on January 22, 1973, the was mandated that an abortion of a fetus was legal DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER of a pregnancy, but the pro-abortion activists kept pushing for more even, strangely some were calling for it up to the birth of a child....The anti abortionists reacted and made plans to get RVW overturned. Solution: An abortion for the first trimester and then done, finished and completed. That would seem the fairest way to me so long as women do not use this method for birth control. Two abortion and after that tough shit ladies.

Post a New Response

(1971883)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sat Dec 16 18:03:50 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 15 13:20:55 2023.

When Roe V Wade was made law by the Supreme Court back on January 22, 1973, the was mandated that an abortion of a fetus was legal DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER of a pregnancy, but the pro-abortion activists kept pushing for more even, strangely some were calling for it up to the birth of a child....The anti abortionists reacted and made plans to get RVW overturned. Solution: An abortion for the first trimester and then done, finished and completed. That would seem the fairest way to me so long as women do not use this method for birth control. Two abortion and after that tough shit ladies.

Post a New Response

(1971884)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Dec 16 19:12:02 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sat Dec 16 18:02:08 2023.

The Supreme Court does not make law.

And first-trimester abortions ate still murder. I guess you don't believe God punishes nations for sins like that?

Post a New Response

(1971893)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Dec 16 21:38:23 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 15 13:20:55 2023.

Why 20 weeks?

Post a New Response

(1971894)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Dec 16 22:01:06 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Train Dude on Sat Dec 16 21:38:23 2023.

I think it’s definitely before the point where the fetus has a developed enough brain that it’s human.

If that’s before 20 weeks, then I want the cutoff to be before that.

Post a New Response

(1971895)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Dec 16 22:27:21 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Dec 16 22:01:06 2023.

So your defining point is brain activity as opposed to a heart beat?

Post a New Response

(1971896)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Dec 16 22:40:35 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Train Dude on Sat Dec 16 22:27:21 2023.

Yes. The heart is only a pump and other animals have such similar hearts that xenotransplantation is an active area of research. The only reason that xenotransplantation doesn’t currently work is because the immune system rejects it, a heart from a pig or a non-human ape is an adequate substitute.

Post a New Response

(1971899)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Dec 17 02:42:55 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by chicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 15 09:32:43 2023.

Similar billboards are all over America.

Not in big cities, but suburbs and small cities.

I wonder if it's a media company policy, or money issue? I'm guessing it's policy.



Post a New Response

(1971900)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 03:23:53 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Train Dude on Sat Dec 16 22:27:21 2023.

So his cutoff point is 40 days, then? That's when brainwaves are first detectable. (And this is with our current level of technology.)

Heck, even the New York Beobachter Slimes (by reprinting "The Ethical Brain") admits that the brain is forming at four weeks!

Post a New Response

(1971905)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 08:28:04 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Dec 16 22:40:35 2023.

I can accept your opinion about 20 weeks or the development of the fetal brain. Sadly, you, once again resort to moronic tangential arguments to support your position and lose all credibility.

Post a New Response

(1971906)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 08:42:38 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 03:23:53 2023.

I am of the opinion that some brain activity in a developing fetus is needed to get the heart to beat. Therefore the heart is more of a reliable indicator of life. That said, the pro abortion crowd is not really interested in the biological aspects of the argument. They are heavily invested in the argument that its a woman's body and she should be able to do anything she wants with her body. Of course, this is falicy. She cannot inject illegal drugs or commit suicide. This of course is aside from the moral question of when life begins or is the developing child a seperate individual.

Post a New Response

(1971919)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:21:35 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 08:28:04 2023.

It’s only “moronic” to you because you are just extremely stupid and you prove it all the time with your inability to be civil when you don’t have a response.

Post a New Response

(1971920)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:24:01 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 08:42:38 2023.

Which ignores the fact that a rudimentary brainstem capable of making a heart beat is again something that other animals also have and is therefore not unique of humanity.

Of course, this is why the entire “tangent” about other animals is relevant.

Post a New Response

(1971921)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:26:06 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 03:23:53 2023.

You don’t care about objective reality.

Post a New Response

(1971932)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sun Dec 17 13:44:39 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:24:01 2023.

What causes the human brain to develop then? Some may point to such a cause as an indicator of humanity to the extent that it's already within the individual in question.

Post a New Response

(1971933)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 14:03:10 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by New Flyer #857 on Sun Dec 17 13:44:39 2023.

By that logic, sperm and/or the egg are humans too and masturbation is genocide. At some point the line needs to be drawn.

Post a New Response

(1971938)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by 3-9 on Sun Dec 17 15:25:48 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 14:03:10 2023.

That's why pro-lifers drew the line at conception, where there's a "reasonable" chance that a human being will develop.

Post a New Response

(1971939)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 15:39:14 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by 3-9 on Sun Dec 17 15:25:48 2023.

Except that it can’t develop without the cooperation of a living person.

Post a New Response

(1971946)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 17:23:41 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Dec 16 19:12:02 2023.

God can punish citizens for all sorts of things neither your nor I can interpret what comes down from on high. Abortion is tearing this country apart and it is a losing issue for conservatives because you are NOT going to get the other side to buy into your anti-abortion nonsense.

Post a New Response

(1971947)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 17:26:16 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:21:35 2023.

Well I was apparently right in my retort to Olah on the subject. Hel abortion is tearing Sub Chat apart.

Post a New Response

(1971951)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 17:44:00 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 17:23:41 2023.

Yep, I agree. Abortion single-handedly stopped last year's predicted "Red Wave" that was supposed to happen. ALL the Republicans had to do was keep their mouth shut and not implicitly say they agreed with the Court (even if the Court was legally correct by giving the power to the States)

Post a New Response

(1971952)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by AlM on Sun Dec 17 18:00:57 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 17:44:00 2023.

even if the Court was legally correct by giving the power to the States

LOL. You're still being conned by Alito's opinion.

He said they were giving the power to the states, but nothing in his actual decision gave the power exclusively to the states. There is nothing in his written opinion to prevent a nationwide federal ban on abortion.



Post a New Response

(1971955)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 18:06:44 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 17:44:00 2023.

That's a lie. And it's also fraud denial.

Post a New Response

(1971956)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 18:11:17 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 17:23:41 2023.

No, abortion is not tearing this country apart at all. You really do believe the liberal media, don't you?

If this country accepts abortion en masse in a de jure sense, then it'll be torn apart all right.

Post a New Response

(1971958)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Dec 17 18:16:18 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 18:06:44 2023.

What fraud this time?

Post a New Response

(1971959)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 18:32:25 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:21:35 2023.

Predictable childish response

Post a New Response

(1971960)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 18:32:27 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:21:35 2023.

Predictable childish response

Post a New Response

(1971961)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 17 18:32:28 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 11:21:35 2023.

Predictable childish response

Post a New Response

(1971964)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 18:45:28 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by AlM on Sun Dec 17 18:00:57 2023.

Alito? Lo@lm!

Post a New Response

(1971965)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 18:46:52 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 18:06:44 2023.

How is that a lie? That's what happened!

Post a New Response

(1971966)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by 3-9 on Sun Dec 17 19:07:21 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 15:39:14 2023.

That's the living person's responsibility. Other people have come up with the reasoning.

Post a New Response

(1971967)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 19:29:00 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 18:46:52 2023.

Olog-hai has a loose grasp on reality.

Post a New Response

(1971968)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 19:29:27 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 17:26:16 2023.

We find other things to bicker on too.

Post a New Response

(1971969)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 19:32:08 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba = Abottions for all, posted by 3-9 on Sun Dec 17 19:07:21 2023.

And she can decide not to take it on.

Post a New Response

(1971970)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 19:45:42 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 18:46:52 2023.

No, that's not what happened. The Democratic "victories" were all fraudulent.

Post a New Response

(1971971)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by AlM on Sun Dec 17 19:48:15 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 18:45:28 2023.

Alito was the author of the Dobbs decision. Didn't you know?



Post a New Response

(1971973)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by 3-9 on Sun Dec 17 20:31:50 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 19:29:27 2023.

For sure.

Post a New Response

(1971974)

view threaded

Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!

Posted by jimmymc25 on Sun Dec 17 20:33:22 2023, in response to Re: ABORTIONS FOR ALL!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Dec 17 19:29:27 2023.

A lot of other things.

Post a New Response

(1971984)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 21:37:33 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 18:11:17 2023.

No Olag, I don't believe the media, not at all. They are a pack jackels and little more than a Democratic sounding board. BUT I DO BELIEVE THE ELECTION RESULTS IN 2022. The GOP had the economy, the border, crime, high gas prices and the success of so many Red states and the poor showing on living conditions in the blue one. Yet suburban women, poor young people and black citizens still supported the Democrats when they had only one issue favoring them. The Republicans must keep their mouths shut about abortion and the states handle the problem themselves.....that is, if they want to win in 2024 and not seize defeat again from the jaws of victory.

Post a New Response

(1971986)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 21:48:21 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by AlM on Sun Dec 17 19:48:15 2023.

He has nothing to do with my statement.

Post a New Response

(1971988)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 17 21:54:01 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 21:37:33 2023.

So you don't believe the media and believe them at the same time? That's doublethink. You also seem to believe RINO propaganda too readily. Fraud is ingrained into elections since 2020 and it'll take a miracle to root it out.

Post a New Response

(1971991)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by AlM on Mon Dec 18 02:39:39 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Dec 17 21:48:21 2023.

OK, fine, we'll ignore that he was the author of the decision.

The COURT's decision did not hand the power over abortion to the states, despite words in the opinion making it sound that way. You got conned by the COURT.



Post a New Response

(1971996)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Dec 18 06:15:48 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 18 02:39:39 2023.

It makes no difference who made the decision, it's still the correct response.

Sure they did

Post a New Response

(1971997)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Dec 18 06:38:00 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Dec 18 06:15:48 2023.

To me it seems that AlM & bingbong share the same bloodlust for the unborn. Its hard to see it any other way.


Post a New Response

(1971998)

view threaded

Re: lla rof snoitroba

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Dec 18 06:50:10 2023, in response to Re: lla rof snoitroba, posted by #4SeaBeachFred on Sun Dec 17 17:23:41 2023.

Abortion is not nonsense, Fred. It is a serious issue. There are those who believe that life begins at conception. There are others that believe that until the child take its first breath, it is not a person. The bingbong response, "if you are against abortion, don't have one." Is wrong-minded and shows the bloodlust of the left. If you are going to surrender a moral principle just to win an election, then you deserve not to win. The procedure may be medically necessary but when its used for convenience, then you equate human life to that of too many cats in a shelter.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 4

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]