|
|
| Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts (1654810) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (1655288) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:34:56 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:23:11 2019. Let's see. Here you are, repeating that I "shit on your car", something you know to be false.Now you're demanding payment for this made-up "incident", which is attempted robbery. You are such a fucking scumbag. |
|
|
| (1655297) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 17:41:34 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:34:56 2019. Um, no it's not. |
|
|
| (1655302) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:45:38 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by bingbong on Mon Sep 9 17:33:19 2019. Thank you for proving my point you fucking cunt liar |
|
|
| (1655303) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 17:45:48 2019, in response to Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story, posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Sep 9 13:02:17 2019. In the hurricane states where we actually know how these things work, they have a saying, "turn around don't drown".The floods don't always make it to Television. This reminds me of a time when JayzeeBMT's boy was having a party in Miami celebrating the Heat, and only a few miles away on the other coast in Florida a hurricane was spawning twisters and blowing roofs off of post offices. He didn't say a damn thing. Only Obama and JayzeeBMT thinks that the eye is the only thing that matters. |
|
|
| (1655305) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:46:50 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:34:56 2019. I'm not demanding, journalist. I'm asking that you pay for it. |
|
|
| (1655306) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:47:15 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 17:41:34 2019. Oh? And you know TDS isn't making this up, how? |
|
|
| (1655308) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:49:09 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:46:50 2019. No. It never happened.You made this up because you couldn't debate me here. It's pathetic. |
|
|
| (1655310) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:50:30 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:49:09 2019. LOL Pathetic |
|
|
| (1655316) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 18:00:25 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:50:30 2019. You want money? Bring time-stamped, uedited photos (we will check for evidence of photoshopping, or reuse of existing images, (and don't think about shitting on your own car, we will test the fabric for recent soiling) of the damage you claim, plus a detailing receipt showing the exact nature of the work done, stamped within ten days of the alleged damage, plus a signed, notarized affidavit of this purported damage from a person not related to you, a former coworker, or a member of this board.Bring these materials to me at 555 Babylon-Farmingdale Rd, West Babylon, NY. If you can meet all these requirements, maybe I'll think about it. Scumbag. |
|
|
| (1655336) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Mon Sep 9 18:38:25 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Sep 9 15:55:28 2019. If this is true, it's another step toward totalitarianism and Secy Ross should be fired. Most individuals and businesses depend on the Commerce Dept for data, but Governnment agencies must now put out lies to defend the stupid, snowflake POTUS rather than the truth.We are not talking about carrying an umbrella to work, but a rare Cat 5 Hurricane that probably killed thousands in Bermuda. People in Alabama were paniced, and the hurricane went to hit the Carolina coast at a Cat 2 and 3. Only the Trump Cult of dimwits think nothing of it. |
|
|
| (1655367) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 19:47:17 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 18:00:25 2019. Did you sign your statement "scumbag"?The thing is you can bet on a fart and lose. That's understandable. |
|
|
| (1655378) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Sep 9 20:57:46 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Joe V on Mon Sep 9 18:38:25 2019. We are not talking about carrying an umbrella to work, but a rare Cat 5 Hurricane that probably killed thousands in Bermuda.Not just rare, unprecedented! |
|
|
| (1655391) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Sep 9 22:02:48 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 12:45:03 2019. Tinfoil hat moment: CNN and MSNBC figure that without 'orange man bad' they have nothing, and if he loses in 2020 they're done. So they're using reverse psychology to get him re-elected. |
|
|
| (1655411) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 10 07:33:14 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Sep 9 15:55:28 2019. Which means Ross should be fired. However, since he was transparently doing trump’s bidding here, I doubt we'll see that happen. I think Cabinet officials have to be impeached, although I'm not entirely sure. |
|
|
| (1655416) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 07:52:20 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:47:15 2019. because you haven't a clue what robbery is, and for some reason Spider-Pig is refusing to correct you on such a simple 1L matter. |
|
|
| (1655418) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 07:56:01 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:17:55 2019. It's cool how you've been tarred and feathered, and yet you're still going on with your racist bullcrap |
|
|
| (1655419) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 07:57:05 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 18:00:25 2019. says the bigot who can't figure out how a storm works and is still posting after being schooled. |
|
|
| (1655424) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 08:10:14 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 07:57:05 2019. Neither you nor President #PussyAssBitch understand how weather and weather forecasting works, nor are you likely to within your lifetimes. |
|
|
| (1655427) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 08:51:31 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 08:10:14 2019. LOL. Although we've already explained it to you.But i see you're saying the hurricane did actually hit Orlando and then vaporized. Tripling down on stupid now? |
|
|
| (1655429) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 08:58:05 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 08:51:31 2019. But i see you're saying the hurricane did actually hit Orlando and then vaporized. Tripling down on stupid now?Please do provide a link to the post in which I said any of that. |
|
|
| (1655430) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:00:21 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 08:10:14 2019. Pussy ass bitch? Are you saying that our President is gay? |
|
|
| (1655433) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:03:31 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:00:21 2019. Nope. Just quoting Chrissy Teigen's Tweet about him.I think I'll show one of your alleged "gay friends" your post, so he can see what you really think of gay people. |
|
|
| (1655436) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:11:35 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:03:31 2019. LOL, you are such a pussy ass bitch |
|
|
| (1655438) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:26:14 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:17:55 2019. It's really tiring, arguing with that caliber of stupid. |
|
|
| (1655439) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:27:23 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:26:14 2019. Yes, arguing with you is tiresome. |
|
|
| (1655441) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:33:09 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:27:23 2019. And yet you keep replying to my posts, even when not directed at you. You seem so desperate for the attention. You really should have that analyzed o e day. |
|
|
| (1655442) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 09:35:21 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:11:35 2019. He's responding to another thread he was pretending to ignore! So now that's Prison Reform, and what everyone knows about the weather. And it's only Tuesday. |
|
|
| (1655444) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:39:43 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:33:09 2019. You do the same thing, you little worm, so STFU. |
|
|
| (1655445) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:41:47 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 08:58:05 2019. bump |
|
|
| (1655448) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:53:16 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 09:39:43 2019. Wow, all the way down to monosyllabic insults. That could be a sign of actual violent anger. I better shut up. |
|
|
| (1655509) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 11:28:41 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Sep 10 09:53:16 2019. He doesn't deserve a reprieve on this thread. Dude doesn't understand what the Cone is all about or even means, and he's above 8 years old I assumed.clownshoes probably doesn't even respect the polygon either. |
|
|
| (1655592) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 16:54:09 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 08:58:05 2019. Well, the official NOAA map has it centered on Orlando, and then vaporizing. You're fine with that aspect of the "controversy" evidently. |
|
|
| (1655595) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 17:01:42 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Sep 10 16:54:09 2019. You wrote that I had the storm hitting Orlando and then "vaporizing". Where is that post? |
|
|
| (1655729) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Sep 11 11:13:56 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Sep 10 17:01:42 2019. So you're arguing about a map that is false from the get-go?A divorced woman from Philadelphia moved to South Florida. She was at a supermarket looking for water, and the shelves were bare. She says, now what? I don't think she suffered any "effects" from the storm as you alone defined it with your phony maps. A normal person can look up at the sky about 500 miles away from the first feeder-band and notice the change and effects You on the other hand will continue to stab into the dark until you dig a hole all the way to Siberia. |
|
|
| (1655735) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Sep 11 11:25:04 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Sep 11 11:13:56 2019. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1655736) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Sep 11 11:26:27 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Sep 11 11:13:56 2019. You still haven't produced a link to the post where you claim I wrote that the hurricane would hit Orlando and then vaporize.Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock... |
|
|
| (1655737) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Sep 11 11:27:51 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Sep 11 11:26:27 2019. You claim to be a grown man. Why are you so childish? |
|
|
| (1655738) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Sep 11 11:31:50 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Sep 11 11:27:51 2019. Because OBS made a patently false post about what I said, and obviously can't worm his way out of this lie.Kinda like some of the posts you make here, Eggface. |
|
|
| (1655741) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Wed Sep 11 11:34:01 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Sep 11 11:31:50 2019. So we ignore your dozens of lies for.....yeah |
|
|
| (1655743) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Sep 11 11:36:17 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Sep 11 11:31:50 2019. The fact is and was, Tinkerbell, that none of the early maps, models and predictions were wrong. You have taken one map and one possible predicted course for this storm and have used it like a sword in your childish vendetta against this president. His map caused no more damage than any of the other incorrect forecasts so why don't you just man up and shut up? |
|
|
| (1655744) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Sep 11 11:36:51 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Sep 11 11:31:50 2019. Correction; The fact is and was, Tinkerbell, that all of the early maps, models and predictions were wrong. You have taken one map and one possible predicted course for this storm and have used it like a sword in your childish vendetta against this president. His map caused no more damage than any of the other incorrect forecasts so why don't you just man up and shut up? |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||