|
|
| Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama (1654810) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 4 |
||
|
| (1655172) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 10:00:35 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 09:35:19 2019. Where did you get this number? |
|
|
| (1655173) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 10:01:39 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 09:50:29 2019. Or just ignored the mistake and not doubled down on it. |
|
|
| (1655174) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:03:59 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 10:01:39 2019. Or tripled and quadrupled down on it... |
|
|
| (1655176) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 10:08:01 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:03:59 2019. LOL Winnie |
|
|
| (1655177) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Sep 9 10:08:34 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Easy on Sun Sep 8 10:52:59 2019. "If Biden gets the nomination, then that will be an interesting race! Reality will be an afterthought as neither has a tight grip." |
|
|
| (1655186) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:28:59 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 10:08:01 2019. LOL Eggface |
|
|
| (1655187) | |
NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:34:52 2019, in response to NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Dave on Sat Sep 7 08:11:12 2019. Guess who Trump is about to fire next? |
|
|
| (1655188) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 10:40:32 2019, in response to NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:34:52 2019. In defense of NOAA management, the NWS office said that Dorian would not strike Alabama, when the more technically correct statement would have been that it was highly unlikely to strike Alabama or not expected to strike Alabama.NOAA management also did not say that Trump's statement that Dorian was likely to strike Alabama was correct (which it wasn't). |
|
|
| (1655190) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:42:26 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 09:48:13 2019. Why do you think it's directed towards you in particular? You gave me 3 options, and I said, "how about this...". Did I say YOU in particular? |
|
|
| (1655191) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Sep 9 10:46:14 2019, in response to NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:34:52 2019. LOL Washington Compost.Thanks for admitting, though, that NOAA's "chief scientist" is utterly politicized and hates science. And everyone was predicting Trump would "fire Mueller" and "fire Rosenstein" and "fire Sessions" too, but that didn't happen, more LOLz. |
|
|
| (1655193) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Sep 9 10:47:07 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:42:26 2019. Looks like "loalm" is going full Luch again. |
|
|
| (1655194) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:48:02 2019, in response to NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:34:52 2019. Dude, no one cares, WTF with this.Good lord, you guys are making complete fools out of yourselves! |
|
|
| (1655196) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:48:53 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Sep 9 10:47:07 2019. Guilty conscience I guess. |
|
|
| (1655197) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:49:28 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 10:40:32 2019. Alabama was never in the official forecasts issued by the National Hurricane Center, something local NWS meteorologists kept pointing out, even in the face of Trump's blatant insistence that he was right and the scientific evidence was wrong.NOAA refuted this in favor of Trump, who almost certainly ordered the agency to back him up. McLean is the acting Chief Scientist at NOAA. By ordering an integrity investigation into Trump's bullshit, he has to know it's career suicide. I applaud him for doing it anyway. |
|
|
| (1655198) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 10:50:17 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:42:26 2019. Did I say YOU in particular?Yes. Complete fools the media (and people like you) look like. |
|
|
| (1655199) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:51:51 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:48:02 2019. When the President of the United States deliberately undermines the integrity of the agency responsible for forecasting our weather, that IS something every American should care about, and many of us actually do.Or are you so deep in the tank for Trump, that you are OK with him telling you what your weather will be? |
|
|
| (1655200) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Sep 9 10:52:59 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:48:02 2019. Let them.The left has always been like this, and the media tried so hard to cover for them for decades. But once you realize what the left is about, everything becomes more transparent. |
|
|
| (1655201) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 10:53:14 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:49:28 2019. Alabama was never in the official forecasts issued by the National Hurricane CenterCorrect. Dorian was never likely to strike Alabama. NOAA management's statement never said otherwise. |
|
|
| (1655204) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 11:11:41 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 09:33:09 2019. What do you mean? |
|
|
| (1655205) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 11:14:05 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:49:28 2019. Yes and southern Florida was evacuated on a whim. Point is early models are inprecise and are wrong more often than the are correct. None of the early predictions were less wrong than the one that pointed to Alabama but only a petty, hate driven media would use it to feed their petty, hate driven loser followers. |
|
|
| (1655206) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 11:15:39 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:51:51 2019. The president looked up this morning. The sky is falling, Winnie. |
|
|
| (1655207) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Sep 9 11:16:37 2019, in response to NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Dave on Sat Sep 7 08:11:12 2019. OMG! Certain people are STILL carrying on about this?!?! |
|
|
| (1655208) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:17:55 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 11:14:05 2019. Except that there were actual impacts from Hurricane Dorian in Florida.LOL @ "hate driven media". That's an excellent description of Fox News! |
|
|
| (1655209) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:18:36 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 11:15:39 2019. Hey Eggface! STFU. |
|
|
| (1655210) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 11:22:15 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:17:55 2019. LOL!!! |
|
|
| (1655211) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 11:23:07 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by AlM on Mon Sep 9 10:50:17 2019. Yes, "and people like you" in general with this. |
|
|
| (1655212) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 11:23:44 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 11:11:41 2019. It's not just "random jackasses". |
|
|
| (1655213) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 11:25:16 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Sep 9 11:16:37 2019. It's unF'in believable. A new thread has even been started about this.And the media must still be having cum circles, as apparently, they aren't done with this complete nonsense yet either. This ridiculous story has lasted more than the hurricane coverage itself!! |
|
|
| (1655214) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Sep 9 11:35:52 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Sep 9 11:16:37 2019. Sharpiegate was stillborn and they're upset about it. |
|
|
| (1655215) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Sep 9 11:37:48 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Easy on Sun Sep 8 10:52:59 2019. Reality will be an afterthought as neither has a tight gripRight: to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital and move the US embassy there, one must not have a "tight grip". Keep thinking you can play with fire. You will get burned. |
|
|
| (1655216) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 11:39:06 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 10:48:02 2019. "'The chances of rainfall over the next several days will be contingent upon the path of Hurricane Dorian', Alabama National Weather Service meteorologist Sizemore said." |
|
|
| (1655221) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 12:45:03 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 09:35:27 2019. This is where we agree. The media helped elect Trump despite their own best efforts. Trump is a dullard but one place where he is smart as a whip is he knows how to play the media.That having been said, I’m not the media and I can cry if I want to. |
|
|
| (1655222) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 12:49:24 2019, in response to Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 11:39:06 2019. We got rain fron Dorian here in Philly last Friday. Does that mean the hurricane hit us, too? |
|
|
| (1655223) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Sep 9 13:02:17 2019, in response to Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 12:49:24 2019. It did rain last Friday, as far out as Chester County, Pa. , but not a heavy ,windy ,rain.I would say a preciptation event related to Dorian. |
|
|
| (1655224) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 13:09:01 2019, in response to Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story, posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Sep 9 13:02:17 2019. Exactly. If what we got in Philly is only a "precipitation event" from Dorian, then any rain from Dorian that fell in Alabama was also a "precipitation event" , too.He's just flailing now. |
|
|
| (1655234) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 14:36:59 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 12:45:03 2019. Of course you can. Just pointing out that all the crying is actually making him stronger. |
|
|
| (1655235) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 14:37:40 2019, in response to Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 13:09:01 2019. WTF cares what it is? Really, you are still going on and on about this nonsense? |
|
|
| (1655248) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 15:15:55 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 09:56:45 2019. But that is the position she took on another thread before storming out of it. |
|
|
| (1655249) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 15:16:52 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Sep 9 11:16:37 2019. Well, all the Russia thing turned up was a bunch of jailed Democrats. So now we have to go on about something that no one will really believe! |
|
|
| (1655257) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Sep 9 15:55:28 2019, in response to NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 10:34:52 2019. It’s coming out now that NOAA administrators contradicted the NWS in the first place because Wilbur Ross threatened to fire them. |
|
|
| (1655261) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 16:05:58 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 15:15:55 2019. Let's just say that Ms. bingbong doesn't have a close personal relationship with honesty. |
|
|
| (1655262) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Sep 9 16:05:59 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Sep 9 15:55:28 2019. Corrected linkArchive.is |
|
|
| (1655274) | |
Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 17:10:21 2019, in response to Re: Mainstream media JayzeeBMT's another story, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Sep 9 14:37:40 2019. The last "rain" that went through Alabama didn't bring much wind, and not even much rain,but it did spawn a few twisters on live television outside of the big downtown. So I guess JayzeeBMT has a point. Except he'd be freaking out like AOC from sheer stupidity. |
|
|
| (1655275) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Sep 9 17:10:53 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:18:36 2019. fucking idiot |
|
|
| (1655279) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:23:08 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Sep 9 15:55:28 2019. "This page cannot be found"However, it fits. I knew somebody in Trump's court gave NOAA their orders. |
|
|
| (1655280) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:23:11 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 11:18:36 2019. LOL Are you ever going to pay for the detailing of my car? |
|
|
| (1655282) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:24:08 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:23:11 2019. LOL. Are you ever going to stop lying? |
|
|
| (1655283) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:24:11 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:23:08 2019. LOL Just like you knew that you'd grow un to be the tooth(less) fairy. |
|
|
| (1655284) | |
Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Sep 9 17:24:45 2019, in response to Re: NOAA Chief Scientist Investigating Why Agency Backed Trump Vs. Its Own Experts, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Sep 9 17:23:08 2019. LOL Just like you knew that you'd grow un to be the tooth(less) fairy. |
|
|
| (1655287) | |
Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Sep 9 17:33:19 2019, in response to Re: NOAA now says Dorian could have impacted Alabama, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Sep 9 16:05:58 2019. I'm farcloser toit then you are. Hater. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 4 |
||