Re: This will be interesting, if true (1631208) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 2 of 3 |
(1631395) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 14:04:40 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:03:53 2019. It’s completely logical. |
|
(1631396) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:04:47 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Tue Jun 11 13:34:53 2019. Somehow I doubt he is. |
|
(1631397) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:05:43 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 14:04:40 2019. Oh? Do explain how. You tend to lean RW, at least you're transmitting so. |
|
(1631398) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Jun 11 14:06:51 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:04:47 2019. Correct, he is not a supporter. But the comment does not indicate loathing, and I've never seen any other post by him that indicates loathing of her. |
|
(1631412) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:16:55 2019, in response to This will be interesting, if true, posted by Dave on Mon Jun 10 16:59:16 2019. |
|
(1631414) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:25:20 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 13:40:02 2019. Your opinion of her doesn't register. SP may actually live in her district, I do not know for certain. If he does, it's very relevant. |
|
(1631415) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 14:27:42 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:05:43 2019. LOL! |
|
(1631418) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:30:51 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:25:20 2019. My congressman is useless. |
|
(1631419) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 14:30:53 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:16:55 2019. Yep! |
|
(1631421) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:31:44 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 14:30:53 2019. You're in Nadler's district? |
|
(1631422) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:51:00 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:30:51 2019. I have no idea who they are. |
|
(1631423) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:53:47 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:51:00 2019. They? I don't have more than one congressman. |
|
(1631430) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:43:55 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Tue Jun 11 14:06:51 2019. Hell, I defend her more often than I attack her. |
|
(1631431) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:44:16 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 14:27:42 2019. IAWTLOL!!!! |
|
(1631432) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:44:28 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:05:43 2019. OMG!!!! |
|
(1631433) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:44:56 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 14:16:55 2019. LOL! |
|
(1631434) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:45:30 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Tue Jun 11 14:25:20 2019. I don’t. |
|
(1631458) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 17:10:06 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:44:28 2019. If you don't toe the Democratic company line in EVERYTHING, that makes you a RWer to the bingbong types. |
|
(1631460) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Jun 11 17:14:50 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Tue Jun 11 10:24:26 2019. Because if tds |
|
(1631461) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 17:15:21 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Jun 11 17:14:50 2019. Dds |
|
(1631463) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Jun 11 17:17:22 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 17:15:21 2019. If you say so. |
|
(1631464) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Jun 11 17:19:55 2019, in response to This will be interesting, if true, posted by Dave on Mon Jun 10 16:59:16 2019. Honestly, she needs to stay in HER LANE right now.I don't like her much,but since she's new,I'll give her the shot she deserves. |
|
(1631468) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Tue Jun 11 17:52:26 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 09:48:05 2019. IAWLOL! |
|
(1631470) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Jun 11 17:54:12 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 09:41:56 2019. Iawtlp |
|
(1631471) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Tue Jun 11 17:54:58 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Dave on Tue Jun 11 13:25:36 2019. IAAWTP |
|
(1631472) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Tue Jun 11 17:55:37 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 15:44:56 2019. IAWLOL. How many times has that meme been repeated? |
|
(1631510) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 12 04:40:08 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jun 11 17:15:21 2019. Forgive me for my ignorance, but does DDS stand for Democrat derangement syndrome? I'm not sure. |
|
(1631515) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 05:22:25 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 12 04:40:08 2019. In this context, yes. |
|
(1631555) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 10:10:03 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Jun 11 17:10:06 2019. LOL! Yeah sure. Not. |
|
(1631620) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 12 12:21:21 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 10:10:03 2019. Well then you should know that Spider Pig does not lean right wing at all. |
|
(1631676) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 13:17:37 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 12 12:21:21 2019. LOL! On some issues he does. |
|
(1631681) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 13:20:50 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 13:17:37 2019. Like what? Guns? Other than that, what? |
|
(1631729) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 12 14:00:50 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 13:20:50 2019. Guns is a Constitutional Rights issue, I believe. |
|
(1631788) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 16:45:11 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Jun 12 14:00:50 2019. IAWTP. True liberals favor gun rights. |
|
(1631795) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 17:17:46 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 16:45:11 2019. True liberals support sensible gun control. As the Constitution mandates. “Well regulated militia”.... |
|
(1631797) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Mtk52983 on Wed Jun 12 17:21:11 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 17:17:46 2019. Regulated doesn't mean that |
|
(1631803) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 17:48:17 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Mtk52983 on Wed Jun 12 17:21:11 2019. No, it doesn’t. |
|
(1631804) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 17:48:36 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 17:17:46 2019. We disagree on what gun control is sensible. |
|
(1631835) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jun 13 03:38:29 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by bingbong on Wed Jun 12 17:17:46 2019. Regulating and denying are two different things. |
|
(1631836) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jun 13 03:38:46 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 17:48:17 2019. I third that! |
|
(1631837) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Jun 13 03:39:13 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jun 12 17:48:36 2019. But meanwhile, she can have possession of a firearm, but no one else can. |
|
(1631845) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 05:05:17 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Mtk52983 on Wed Jun 12 17:21:11 2019. So what!Do you disagree that arms can be regulated? Or are you one of those people who is in favor of unregulated sale of hand-carried anti-tank and anti-aircraft weaponry? |
|
(1631864) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jun 13 06:03:39 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 05:05:17 2019. Stop using the word "regulated" in that context. |
|
(1631867) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 06:05:24 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jun 13 06:03:39 2019. Why? I am NOT using it in the context of a "well regulated militia." I am using it in the modern context.Just because bingbong is wrong about the phrase as used in the 2nd amendment doesn't mean the term is invalid now. |
|
(1631871) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jun 13 06:10:41 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 06:05:24 2019. Why? I am NOT using it in the context of a "well regulated militia." I am using it in the modern context.The problem with doing that is that people think that it has to do with the prefatory clause. So just use "controlled" and be done with it. Besides, I use "regulated" to mean subject to regulation, and gun control can be implemented by statute instead. |
|
(1631876) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Jun 13 06:33:23 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 05:05:17 2019. "Regulate" means "to adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation." Because of the lack of training, the founders wanted the citizens to be able to practice with their muskets and bayonets during times other than war so if called up they would be ready to fight. They did not go around issuing cannons to everybody. As the majority noted (in dicta) in Heller, "the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment’s ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home." Anti-tank and anti-aircraft would likely be able to be prohibited on that ground. |
|
(1631879) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 06:42:12 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jun 13 06:10:41 2019. But the right has co-opted "controlled" to mean "banned." |
|
(1631880) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Jun 13 06:43:34 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 06:42:12 2019. Well because you have people on the left like the widow from upstate New York who think that the only suitable control is banning. |
|
(1631881) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 06:44:24 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Jun 13 06:33:23 2019. I refuse to use "regulate" only in its 18th century definition. As I pointed out to SP, the right has co-opted "controlled," which would otherwise be a fine substitute. |
|
(1631882) | |
Re: This will be interesting, if true |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jun 13 06:45:16 2019, in response to Re: This will be interesting, if true, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Jun 13 06:43:34 2019. Yawn. |
|
Page 2 of 3 |