|
|
| Re: The Presidency should be abolished (1436696) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (1469936) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 08:49:22 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Oct 15 08:22:31 2017. Those same people who swore Obama wasnt American and swore Jade Helm would be used to usher Marshal law? Those people sir? |
|
|
| (1469937) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 15 10:35:53 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by orange blossom special on Wed May 17 13:42:57 2017. The last creep would gladly have abolished the Presidency if he could. |
|
|
| (1469941) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Oct 15 11:11:59 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 02:58:07 2017. No, they are not. And I agree that they wouldn't want to get involved with the current batch of fools. |
|
|
| (1469949) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 11:46:23 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 08:35:55 2017. Trump had help in winning the election, from a foreign government. The popular vote outcome was no "fluke". |
|
|
| (1469953) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 15 11:54:03 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 15 10:35:53 2017. Have to agree. |
|
|
| (1469957) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sun Oct 15 11:57:42 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Oct 14 22:26:26 2017. Ibraham pig, the ultimate flip-flopper. |
|
|
| (1469958) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 15 11:58:31 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by orange blossom special on Sun Oct 15 11:57:42 2017. Can't be a lib if you don't flip-flop from time to time. See, bingbong shouldn't have said he wasn't a lib. |
|
|
| (1469960) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 12:00:36 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 11:46:23 2017. Where is your proof, fluffy? You are talking shit but can't back it up. |
|
|
| (1469961) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 15 12:01:21 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 12:00:36 2017. When he "backs it up", it's always with lefty propaganda. |
|
|
| (1469963) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 12:08:24 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 15 12:01:21 2017. Interesting turn of a phrase |
|
|
| (1469967) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 15 12:29:13 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 02:58:07 2017. I can respond now because I’ve finally stopped laughing. |
|
|
| (1469969) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 13:35:15 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 12:00:36 2017. Name calling. A true sign of weakness. |
|
|
| (1469970) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 13:44:01 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 13:35:15 2017. You still haven't provided proof, fluffy. |
|
|
| (1469971) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 13:46:48 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 13:44:01 2017. Why? Again, your Catch-22 makes providing proof impossible. |
|
|
| (1469972) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Oct 15 13:54:43 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 02:58:07 2017. LOL! How is zero political experience Trump qualified to be president? |
|
|
| (1469975) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sun Oct 15 14:06:13 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 08:04:55 2017. Aside from the fact we were all okey with maybe having a king 9 years ago,I think foreign governments would disagree with the confusing messages part. We seem to have a problem with the message changing from president to president. And sometimes, even between President and State Department. I think it makes it difficult for our allies and enemies alike sometimes. |
|
|
| (1469979) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 14:37:38 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 13:46:48 2017. You provide the proof and let me decide whether to look at it. |
|
|
| (1469980) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 14:46:29 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 14:37:38 2017. If I post a link you don't like, you'll say it's "infected". If I list the evidence without a link, you'll say it's "bullshit".Go play that game with somebody else. |
|
|
| (1469981) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 14:48:54 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Oct 15 13:54:43 2017. Are you aware of what the requirements are to become president per the Constitution of the United States? Donald J. Trump met all of the requirements. anything else on your mind? |
|
|
| (1469982) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 14:50:01 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 14:46:29 2017. So, in other words, you are full of shit and can't back up your claim. |
|
|
| (1469985) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 14:59:07 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 14:50:01 2017. Sure I can. But no matter what I post, you won't accept it. So I choose not to play. |
|
|
| (1469987) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 15:41:00 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 08:05:25 2017. Oh stop! |
|
|
| (1469988) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 15:42:46 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Oct 15 13:54:43 2017. He's a real American! Like Hulk Hogan! |
|
|
| (1469989) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 16:26:41 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 15 14:59:07 2017. LOL. Once again you have been shown to be so full of shit. |
|
|
| (1469990) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sun Oct 15 16:29:43 2017, in response to The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 17 12:22:21 2017. should the Electoral College be done away with |
|
|
| (1469991) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 17:07:48 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sun Oct 15 16:29:43 2017. It's not going to. Like it or not, this is how our electoral system has worked for the last two hundred years. |
|
|
| (1469992) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sun Oct 15 17:13:12 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 17:07:48 2017. well |
|
|
| (1469993) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 15 17:35:29 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sun Oct 15 16:29:43 2017. Absolutely! |
|
|
| (1469995) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sun Oct 15 20:17:25 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 15 17:35:29 2017. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1469997) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 20:52:00 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 15:41:00 2017. You said he is qualified right? Man dont know the constitution, didnt know the nuclear triad, didnt know a lot of other things that a president should know or have a basic understanding of.At least know the Constitution... |
|
|
| (1469998) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 21:47:52 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 20:52:00 2017. He's crazy like a fox |
|
|
| (1469999) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Oct 15 22:33:01 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 14:48:54 2017. I am aware. I'm also aware the BKLYN said"Because right now, the most qualified people are in charge" Which leads me to believe if the MOST qualified people is in charge he's using a different criteria than the constitution to determine presidential and his cabinet's qualifications. If constituation was qualification then EVERYBODY would be qualified every adminstratio making the use of the word "MOST" a moot point. |
|
|
| (1470000) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Oct 15 22:35:04 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 15 10:35:53 2017. Proof? besides the fact you hate the man of course... |
|
|
| (1470001) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 22:57:00 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 21:47:52 2017. Hes qualified or hes a fox? Which one |
|
|
| (1470002) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 22:57:56 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Oct 15 22:33:01 2017. Hes using 4chan or r/donald trolling to determine his criteria |
|
|
| (1470003) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 22:58:25 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 15 10:35:53 2017. Your paranoia shows how mentally retarded you are |
|
|
| (1470004) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 23:02:44 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 15 22:57:00 2017. Both. Think about it. He purposely cones across the way he does. |
|
|
| (1470008) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Oct 16 02:08:27 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Oct 15 08:22:31 2017. So much for being an old-school Republican. |
|
|
| (1470009) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Oct 16 02:12:59 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 15 10:35:53 2017. You're a creep. |
|
|
| (1470010) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 16 02:22:45 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Oct 16 02:12:59 2017. Very poor comeback, but other than that, IAWTP. |
|
|
| (1470016) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Mon Oct 16 09:13:03 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 23:02:44 2017. Or he does because he has no clue what hes talking about |
|
|
| (1470026) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Oct 16 15:29:48 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Oct 15 16:26:41 2017. Only Olog and OBS would agree with your assessment. Looks like you've won lol. |
|
|
| (1470034) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Mon Oct 16 17:01:46 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 23:02:44 2017. You give the president of the Virgin Islands too much credit. I on the other hand agree with Tillerson's alleged assessment of Trump. |
|
|
| (1470051) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Oct 16 19:08:50 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished?, posted by ftgreeneg on Mon Oct 16 17:01:46 2017. It's a combination of both |
|
|
| (1470052) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Mon Oct 16 19:50:00 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 15 17:07:48 2017. and its a failure |
|
|
| (1470053) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Oct 16 19:55:07 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Mon Oct 16 19:50:00 2017. How is it a failure? |
|
|
| (1470057) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Mon Oct 16 20:27:31 2017, in response to Re: The Presidency should be abolished, posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Oct 16 19:55:07 2017. trump |
|
|
| (1470163) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN THE PRESIDENCY! |
|
|
Posted by Andrew Saucci on Tue Oct 17 21:56:36 2017, in response to The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 17 12:22:21 2017. We already have a supreme executive council. It's called the Supreme Court. It got that way because the cowardly inhabitants of the executive branch and the legislative branch let the courts get away with becoming a super-branch of government instead of reining it in when appropriate. The legislative branch allowed the courts to make essentially new laws and the executive branch allowed the courts to make regulations besides. Look how much power one man-- Judge Harold Greene-- was allowed to reshape the entire telephone industry in 1982. Why was the crafting of telecommunications policy left to the courts instead of elected officials? Of course, I could go on and on. |
|
|
| (1470167) | |
Re: TEAR DOWN THE PRESIDENCY! |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 17 22:41:50 2017, in response to Re: TEAR DOWN THE PRESIDENCY!, posted by Andrew Saucci on Tue Oct 17 21:56:36 2017. That’s bullshit. |
|
|
| (1470368) | |
Re: The Presidency should be abolished |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Wed Oct 18 22:00:18 2017, in response to The Presidency should be abolished, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 17 12:22:21 2017. Sounds like a convoluted version of a parliamentary system.Who would remove/dismiss a council member? And under what criteria? The same as impeachment or just for loss of confidence? Who would be directing/coordinating them if the President is just a figurehead? A prime minister by a different name? Who does he/she answer to? Who is in charge of the "nuclear button"? |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||