|
|
| Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor (1388904) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 8 |
|
|
| (1388904) | |
Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016 It resulted in modest declines to their employment rates and hours worked |
|
|
| (1388905) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 14:35:05 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. I'm shocked! |
|
|
| (1388907) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Allan on Sun Aug 21 14:37:03 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. As was predicted by a lot of people. |
|
|
| (1388909) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:57:59 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Allan on Sun Aug 21 14:37:03 2016. Actions have consequences. |
|
|
| (1388911) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 15:21:01 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. Got a source for that? The moonie owned Washington examiner is NOT a credible source. |
|
|
| (1388912) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Aug 21 15:23:40 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. While the workers did experience boosts in earnings overall, the report found the increases would have happened without the higher minimum thanks to the region's growing economy.Yeah, it helped workers overall but those workers would have been helped anyway. Such a statement requires evidence. |
|
|
| (1388913) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 15:34:24 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. Not an unintended consequence, though. In the end they will become more dependent on government dole. DEMOCRATS like that and exploit it. |
|
|
| (1388922) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 16:21:55 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 15:21:01 2016. Both the WaPo and the WSJ have reported on the same University of Washington study results.What would you know about credibility since every time you post you're incorrect? |
|
|
| (1388924) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 16:44:37 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 15:34:24 2016. Are we going to pretend that a shitty minimum wage does not cost the federal government anything ?"Report: Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers $6.2 Billion In Public Assistance" http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/#6bb600047cd8 Republicans are only interested in Walmart's profits and share price. |
|
|
| (1388927) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:26:09 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. I'm looking forward to more automation. |
|
|
| (1388928) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 17:31:58 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 16:44:37 2016. And all I said was that the higher minimum wage will cost taxpayers more. You did read that, didn't you Joe V? |
|
|
| (1388930) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:44:49 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 17:31:58 2016. And he said you were wrong and showed a fact. It is however a matter of dispute which costs more. |
|
|
| (1388931) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 17:48:33 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 16:21:55 2016. So where's the links to those.Your posts are suspect when you use those RW echo chamber sources. They are not reliable. They are not journalism. |
|
|
| (1388932) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 17:52:56 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 17:31:58 2016. Yes I did read it. The trouble with you right-wingers is you can't look at two sets of data, do a balancing act, and make a decision. From your latest crack, you still can't understand it.You also failed to consider a slowed economy from reduced purchasing power from reduced wages. Forget GDP about 3% and 4% growth rates when we have a shitty minimum wage, and a federal wage for tipped restaurant employees frozen at $2.34/hour for over 20 years. So you can stop blaming Obama for slow growth too. That is why the Republican constituency demographic has become the lesser-educated of the two major parties, can only grasp what FOX news and like media tells them what to think. |
|
|
| (1388935) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 18:00:34 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 17:52:56 2016. You left out"ech chamber" and "talking lamp" from your post. I said that the cost to the government would govupbeith the higher minimum wage. You've done nothing to disprove it. Thats the trouble with you low functioning liberals. You can't think off script. |
|
|
| (1388937) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 18:04:34 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 18:00:34 2016. You don't know the cost would go up or how much it would because you forget the Walmart-Medicaid/SNAP issue, some of which would be deducted. You are dealing with incomplete facts.REAL conservatives, of which there are very few anymore, look at all the facts. FAKE conservatives like you look at only what they choose, perfect FOX Noise robots. |
|
|
| (1388942) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 18:47:37 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 18:04:34 2016. You have the talking points down pat. |
|
|
| (1388944) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 18:51:33 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 17:48:33 2016. Both WaPo and the WSJ require a subscription to read from the link. The Washington Examiner does not. And if you spent 30 seconds Googling the story you would have found it on other sites.Oh, my bad...I keep forgetting you don't know how to Google search. |
|
|
| (1388945) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 18:52:02 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 18:47:37 2016. At least I have points to make. |
|
|
| (1388947) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 18:53:37 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:26:09 2016. Only a matter of time. |
|
|
| (1388949) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 18:58:01 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 18:51:33 2016. Bingbong is not Google friendly |
|
|
| (1388950) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Aug 21 18:58:55 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 18:52:02 2016. Especially the one that keeps your hat on center |
|
|
| (1388952) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Aug 21 19:42:09 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 17:52:56 2016. iawtp |
|
|
| (1388955) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 20:33:23 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 18:51:33 2016. You'd have to stop confusing me with someone that's interested in your hateful approaches to real problems real people are facing while you sit in your gated "community".Keeping wages depressed does nothing for those trapped in poverty. |
|
|
| (1388956) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Aug 21 20:53:14 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 20:33:23 2016. iawtp |
|
|
| (1388961) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 21 21:30:00 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Joe V on Sun Aug 21 17:52:56 2016. You also failed to consider a slowed economy from reduced purchasing power from reduced wagesA lower minimum wage is not "reduced wages". And you're omitting the lack of purchasing power that results from a constantly-devalued currency. |
|
|
| (1388962) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Aug 21 21:34:10 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:57:59 2016. As do elections. |
|
|
| (1388966) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 22:04:34 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 20:33:23 2016. What's depressing is the fantasy world you live in. |
|
|
| (1388971) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:35:54 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 22:04:34 2016. Correct. |
|
|
| (1388972) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:36:05 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 17:48:33 2016. LOL! You're clueless. |
|
|
| (1388973) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:36:13 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 16:21:55 2016. pwn3d |
|
|
| (1388974) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:38:00 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by bingbong on Sun Aug 21 15:21:01 2016. Got a source for that?it also commissioned a study of the increase's effect by the University of Washington. A report released in July It gave the source right in the article. What is your problem? |
|
|
| (1388975) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:39:42 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:26:09 2016. Yep, me too. |
|
|
| (1388977) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 23:23:25 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:38:00 2016. She doesn't bother reading, that's the problem. One assumes an article would be read before criticizing it. But when it involves Bingbong, that would be a mistaken assumption since she only looks at where the story came from before closing her mind. I've lost count of how many times she's denigrated a news journal without bothering to read its story, which invariably names the original source material that the reporter is writing about. |
|
|
| (1388981) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 23:55:56 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 23:23:25 2016. Yep. She's crazy/lazy/nuts. |
|
|
| (1388982) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Mon Aug 22 00:27:08 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Aug 21 20:53:14 2016. You spelled it wrong |
|
|
| (1388985) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Aug 22 00:33:16 2016, in response to Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Dave on Sun Aug 21 14:30:28 2016. Does Seattle have any large suburbs outside the city limits? Look at those to take on a more city-like vibe as both people and businesses are priced out of the city proper.At least NY was smart enough to put an emergency break on the upstate wage hike... |
|
|
| (1388987) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 22 01:09:10 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by R2ChinaTown on Mon Aug 22 00:27:08 2016. ok |
|
|
| (1388992) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 22 02:33:42 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:26:09 2016. I'm looking forward to more automation.What role will humans play in an automated society? |
|
|
| (1388993) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 22 02:34:28 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:26:09 2016. I'm looking forward to more automation.What role will humans play in an automated society? |
|
|
| (1388994) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 22 02:35:25 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Aug 21 17:26:09 2016. I'm looking forward to more automation.What role will humans play in an automated society? |
|
|
| (1388995) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 22 02:38:07 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Aug 21 22:39:42 2016. Only people who look forward to that are the repair mechanics of said automation. |
|
|
| (1388996) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 22 02:38:35 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 22 02:33:42 2016. They don't have an answer. |
|
|
| (1388998) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 22 02:50:52 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 22 02:33:42 2016. Clean up the oil stains on the floor for $1.65 an hour. Robots get to stay at a fine Trump hotel, everyone else can have a nice cardboard box. That's where we're headed anyway, might as well just do it. |
|
|
| (1388999) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 22 02:51:19 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 22 02:38:35 2016. Women and political correctness are ruining civilization.If mainstream entertainment was not so politically correct, people wouldn't spend time on message boards, FB, and Youtube. Subchat would not exist as we know it today. |
|
|
| (1389000) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 22 02:51:51 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 22 02:38:07 2016. Board changers get $1.65 an hour too. Just drop the door, replace the module that doesn't have a light blinking, no smarts needed. |
|
|
| (1389024) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Aug 22 07:06:32 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 22 02:38:07 2016. Wrong. Automation kicks ass!!! |
|
|
| (1389026) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Mon Aug 22 07:21:21 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 22 02:51:51 2016. More efficient that way. |
|
|
| (1389027) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Mon Aug 22 07:22:10 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 22 02:50:52 2016. Jealous? |
|
|
| (1389028) | |
Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Mon Aug 22 07:24:45 2016, in response to Re: Early data show $15 minimum hurting Seattle's poor, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 22 02:50:52 2016. Why would you care? You got yours. Everything else is window dressing . |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 8 |
|