|
|
| Be S.A.F.E. (1252195) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|
|
|
| (1252196) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:40:38 2014, in response to Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:32:34 2014. Excluding AlM from your List means the entire List is suspect.Nilet is the only undefeated person on the List. Terrapin is a joke. |
|
|
| (1252198) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:45:22 2014, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:40:38 2014. Are you alright? |
|
|
| (1252199) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:47:56 2014, in response to Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:32:34 2014. WillD is First Alternate. |
|
|
| (1252200) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Dec 31 20:50:35 2014, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:40:38 2014. Happy New Year ass kisser. |
|
|
| (1252201) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:54:40 2014, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:47:56 2014. Stop trolling.AlM is unbeatable. He wont' comment on my cold winter/cool summer connection to lower homicide rate in NYC because the race-based abortion thing comes up next and Leftists don't like that connection. |
|
|
| (1252203) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:59:03 2014, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:54:40 2014. Yeah, and those guys also cannot make the connection between global warming and higher homicide rates. It does not register and throws them off point. |
|
|
| (1252205) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 21:03:50 2014, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:59:03 2014. I have to conclude that you won't #Summit in Tampa or Newark because you're really a homosexual flight attendant and not a co-pilot.You can prove me wrong. Yes, brutally cold snowy winter followed by a summer that wasn't too hot and it makes sense NY would not have an increase in homicides. |
|
|
| (1252216) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Dec 31 21:35:49 2014, in response to Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:32:34 2014. O.K. S.T.F.U. |
|
|
| (1252270) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Thu Jan 1 09:04:56 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:40:38 2014. Due to the incessant calls clamoring demand call it what you will for this information before the New Year I felt increasing pressure to put it out in draft form. It was never intended to be a finished product nor meant as an exhaustive list. It is a work in progress. The S.A.F.E. List, otherwise known as Stay Away From Each of These Youths (S.A.F.E.T.Y.), is a living, breathing document and is subject to change. The situation remains fluid. Please monitor this thread periodically for real time, critical updates. |
|
|
| (1252291) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 12:15:43 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:40:38 2014. Nilet is the only undefeated person on the ListStop talking like an idiot. |
|
|
| (1252292) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 12:15:57 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Dec 31 20:50:35 2014. pwn4g3 |
|
|
| (1252293) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 12:17:34 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:54:40 2014. because the race-based abortion thing comes upOnly because you bring up the canard. |
|
|
| (1252306) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 12:43:58 2015, in response to Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:32:34 2014. I wasn't on SubTalk back when this in-joke started. Can someone explain what it means to "win" or "lose" a thread? |
|
|
| (1252321) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 13:20:39 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 12:43:58 2015. It has nothing to do with SubTalk. It's all in Luch's imagination. Ask him. |
|
|
| (1252324) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 13:23:43 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 13:20:39 2015. Luch and Cortelyou have been making references to "winning" and "losing" threads for years now. Someone has to know when this meme started. Is there some rule against telling (relatively) late arrivals? |
|
|
| (1252336) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 13:52:20 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 13:23:43 2015. My point is that Luch made it up and the explanation is only in his mind. Cortelyounext is just screwing around with him. |
|
|
| (1252354) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 1 14:26:41 2015, in response to Be S.A.F.E., posted by cortelyounext on Wed Dec 31 20:32:34 2014. I shred JayMan to pieces. Practically ran him off.The only people here I have never pwn3d are Heypaul, JohnnyMints and The Hat. |
|
|
| (1252355) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 1 14:33:15 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:54:40 2014. I took AlM to school in the Second Amendment threads.I'm gonna go after PinkJazz now. His/her post from a few days ago annoyed me. |
|
|
| (1252359) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 14:44:28 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 31 20:54:40 2014. Ha. I agreed with you that abortion has contributed to lower crime rates. I just added another 10 contributors as well. |
|
|
| (1252361) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 14:46:49 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 1 14:33:15 2015. Nobody has yet shown how the mainstream Second Amendment debate is about anything other than where you draw the line between what is allowed and what is not, and what restrictions you put on that which is allowed. |
|
|
| (1252365) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 1 14:55:08 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 14:46:49 2015. You want people to show proficiency before they can exercise their Second Amendment rights.No such government-mandated (and as such arbitrary) test or other undue burdens are required for a citizen to enjoy and exercise any other individual, fundamental, enumerated right. Like many liberals, you insist on treating the right to keep and bear arms as just another privilege needing a license rather than the basic right that it is. |
|
|
| (1252373) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 15:05:58 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 1 14:55:08 2015. You want people to show proficiency before they can exercise their Second Amendment rights.I don't think Justice Scalia will ever disagree with me on that. And without Scalia, any Second Amendment position is a lost cause. |
|
|
| (1252377) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 15:10:12 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 14:44:28 2015. But I made a comment about homicide in NYC dropping because of the polar vortex and cooler summer. No one responded to my post, which might be the best explanation as to why homicides dropped. |
|
|
| (1252378) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 15:15:11 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 15:10:12 2015. So homicides dropped because nobody responded to your post?Blast. I just made homicide go up again. Sorries! |
|
|
| (1252379) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 15:16:35 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 15:15:11 2015. Nologic. That's your new handle. |
|
|
| (1252401) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 17:09:14 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 13:52:20 2015. Just because it's made up doesn't mean it can't have an internally consistent and understood meaning. |
|
|
| (1252413) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 18:42:37 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 13:20:39 2015. +999999999999999999999999999999LOL@Nilet for not understanding context and nuance. |
|
|
| (1252414) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 18:43:40 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 13:52:20 2015. +78787878787878787878787878787878787878787 |
|
|
| (1252416) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 18:46:29 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 17:09:14 2015. I don't understand it and I don't think anyone but Luch does. |
|
|
| (1252417) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 18:47:31 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 18:42:37 2015. What nuance and context have I missed? |
|
|
| (1252418) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 18:48:35 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 18:46:29 2015. He hasn't offered any explanation? Have there been any consistencies over the years from which a working definition of "winning" a thread might be divined?Or is this part of a larger joke or meme? |
|
|
| (1252419) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 18:50:03 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 18:48:35 2015. Maybe he has, but I haven't paid enough attention to figure it out. |
|
|
| (1252422) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 19:04:48 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 18:48:35 2015. "Winning" a thread means that in Luch's supposed judgment the winner had the more cogent argument. Complicating this label is that Luch's judgment is often very strange. Added to this is that Luch may sometimes just pretend that he thinks someone won a thread in order to pull the other person's chain. |
|
|
| (1252423) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 19:09:23 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 18:47:31 2015. All the posts where Luch mentions winning and losing. |
|
|
| (1252424) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jan 1 19:16:39 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 19:04:48 2015. I don't think it's like that. |
|
|
| (1252427) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 19:32:18 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 19:09:23 2015. "All the posts" spread out over 20 years? That's not what "nuance and context" means. |
|
|
| (1252435) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 20:57:16 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 19:32:18 2015. No, over maybe the last 5 years or so? They all have context and nuance. |
|
|
| (1252447) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 22:31:01 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 20:57:16 2015. Ironically, the fact that you felt the need to quibble over exactly how many years it's been proves you don't really understand what nuance and context mean. |
|
|
| (1252451) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 22:56:26 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 1 20:57:16 2015. Selkirk kicked your ass last night and now you're back for more from Nilet. You're off to quite a start in 2015. |
|
|
| (1252452) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 22:58:04 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by AlM on Thu Jan 1 19:04:48 2015. "Winning" a thread means that in Luch's supposed judgment the winner had the more cogent argument.You pretty much hit the nail on the head. Complicating this label is that Luch's judgment is often very strange. No. It's not strange and I'm very consistent. Added to this is that Luch may sometimes just pretend that he thinks someone won a thread in order to pull the other person's chain. I've never done this. However, Straight Jacket SMAZZA is guilty of just that by calling himself and "AlMist" then claiming a w1n against you in a thread about the 2nd Amendment. Now that's intellectually and dishonest chain pulling, something I'm not guilty of. |
|
|
| (1252453) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 23:09:24 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 22:58:04 2015. In short, AlM is accusing me of the very thing Straight Jacket SMAZZA is doing to him. Pulling his chain.Amazing. |
|
|
| (1252459) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 00:03:52 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 22:56:26 2015. WRONGWALAAA |
|
|
| (1252460) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 00:05:05 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 22:31:01 2015. Wrong. The fact that you think I'm "quibbling" over how many years it has been proves that you fail to understand nuance and context. I had a relevant reason for giving the number of years. Can you think what it might have been? |
|
|
| (1252461) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 00:07:04 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 1 23:09:24 2015. I've always said that you must be trolling because no one* could possibly be as stupid as you are here.*except for Dan Lawrence and maybe bingong/selkirktmo and a couple others |
|
|
| (1252462) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 00:14:59 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Nilet on Thu Jan 1 18:48:35 2015. A win means an argument takes place. SOmeone has to win, just like in a fight. |
|
|
| (1252469) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 00:33:48 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 00:07:04 2015. Um, AlM attacked me with an accusation applicable to Straight Jacket SMAZZA. I don't pull anyone's chain. |
|
|
| (1252470) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Fri Jan 2 00:50:24 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 00:05:05 2015. Wrong. The fact that you think I'm "quibbling" over how many years it has been proves that you fail to understand nuance and context.Yet again proving how thoroughly this has gone over your head. I had a relevant reason for giving the number of years. Can you think what it might have been? Yes. You completely failed to understand that when a person makes reference to an act or in-joke built up over multiple years, it is entirely reasonable for casual onlookers to be unfamiliar with the history and ask people in on the joke to provide context rather than try to wade through several million words worth of posts, most of which are completely irrelevant and all of which are poorly indexed and difficult to search through. Because you completely failed to understand that, you became fixated on the exact number of years I mentioned and tried to "correct" what was actually an inconsequential detail. If you can think of a better explanation, feel free to offer it. |
|
|
| (1252478) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 01:39:57 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Jan 2 00:07:04 2015. oh, and please stop bringing shame to your wife. |
|
|
| (1252483) | |
Re: Be S.A.F.E. |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 2 04:10:19 2015, in response to Re: Be S.A.F.E., posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 1 12:15:57 2015. Nologic.That's your new handle. |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|