| Re: Unarmed (1221594) | |
| 
       | 
    |
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
| 
		 Page 3 of 3  | 
	||
| (1223502) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Gamera on Sat Sep 6 14:36:34 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Sep 6 14:10:11 2014. Do you even know what it says? | 
    |
| (1223584) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 6 18:33:55 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Dave on Mon Sep 1 18:17:10 2014. Never mind female. | 
    |
| (1223614) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Cornell Park on Sat Sep 6 19:12:06 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Gamera on Sat Sep 6 14:36:34 2014. Gee, I hope that is a rhetorical question! | 
    |
| (1223652) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Sep 6 20:21:59 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Fri Sep 5 19:32:46 2014. Unlike you, I'm actually rational.No you're not. And yes I am rational.  | 
    |
| (1223657) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Sep 6 20:26:28 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Sep 6 10:49:06 2014. NOTHING THERE!!!WADL!!  | 
    |
| (1223698) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Sep 6 21:12:39 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Fri Sep 5 20:41:10 2014. wrong | 
    |
| (1223703) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by quilldepot on Sat Sep 6 21:20:33 2014, in response to Unarmed, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Sep 1 17:28:07 2014. Hashtags make it 200% legit | 
    |
| (1226315) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 03:43:17 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Sep 6 21:12:39 2014. Care to elaborate? | 
    |
| (1226333) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 04:03:46 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Sep 6 20:21:59 2014. No, you're just contradicting everything I say.Word of advice: That's only funny when John Cleese and/or Terry Jones do it.  | 
    |
| (1226338) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 04:07:31 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Terrapin Station on Sat Sep 6 20:26:28 2014. Oh? What life have they found on Mars? | 
    |
| (1226343) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 04:24:25 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 04:03:46 2014. Heh. Obligatory "PWNED!!!!!" here. ;) | 
    |
| (1226404) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 16 13:04:20 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 04:07:31 2014. There may not be any life on Mars, but that doesn't imply that there's nothing there. Rocks, sand, ice and rovers count as "things." | 
    |
| (1226444) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 16:20:53 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 16 13:04:20 2014. But he said "LIFE" on Mars ... unless rocks vote there of course. :) | 
    |
| (1226483) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 18:49:09 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 16 13:04:20 2014. Dan Lawrence never said no sand, ice, rocks, or rovers could be found on Mars. He said there was no life there. | 
    |
| (1226518) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 16 19:34:59 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 18:49:09 2014. He just said "Nothing There!" Until he clarified, it's subject to interpretation. | 
    |
| (1226532) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 19:44:24 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 16 19:34:59 2014. Come on. You're not Terrapin Station. You can understand context. | 
    |
| (1226541) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 16 19:50:58 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 19:44:24 2014. If you or most other people posted those exact words, I'd assume that it would be referring specifically to life on Mars, but not with Dan Lawrence. | 
    |
| (1226543) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 19:51:59 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 04:07:31 2014. No. He was wrong about the context. Which is something you're quite often wrong about as well. | 
    |
| (1226544) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 19:52:26 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 16:20:53 2014. I know what I said. And Dan Lawrence was wrong. | 
    |
| (1226547) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Tue Sep 16 19:56:36 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 19:51:59 2014.  
 | 
    |
| (1226553) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 20:03:27 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 19:52:26 2014. Nope ... twisting other people's words ... but then that's what you do. :) | 
    |
| (1226558) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 20:08:13 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 20:03:27 2014. Yes he was. He was wrong. Completely wrong. If he wasn't wrong, why would I say that he's wrong? | 
    |
| (1226563) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 20:12:10 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 20:08:13 2014. Heh. Gee willikers! I have no idea. :) | 
    |
| (1226571) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 20:56:16 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 20:12:10 2014. Exactly. So keep quiet if you have no idea. He was wrong, as I said. | 
    |
| (1226572) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 20:57:04 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 20:56:16 2014. Your wish is my command, oh monobrowed one! :) | 
    |
| (1226573) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 20:57:40 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 20:57:04 2014. I highly doubt that. I hope I'm wrong though. | 
    |
| (1226574) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 21:01:33 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 16 20:57:40 2014. I misspelled "one durr" ... my bad, dog. | 
    |
| (1226591) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 16 23:02:56 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Sep 4 14:21:16 2014. no you are | 
    |
| (1226592) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 16 23:03:01 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Sep 4 14:21:16 2014. no you are | 
    |
| (1226638) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Sep 17 07:38:14 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Sep 16 21:01:33 2014. As always. | 
    |
| (1226884) | |
		Re: Unarmed | 
    |
| 
 Posted by Nilet on Wed Sep 17 19:01:33 2014, in response to Re: Unarmed, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Sep 5 06:01:09 2014. Slow(er) on the uptake, are you? I already answered that point three days before you managed to excrete this garbage. | 
    |
| 
		 Page 3 of 3  | 
	||