Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10>> : Last

< Previous Page  

Page 7 of 21

Next Page >  

(1220028)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 03:46:31 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Aug 28 01:31:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Do you think BKLYN is my real last name? Yes, my name is William.

I want bigotry to get eradicated so we can hate our fellow Man based on his actions, NOT his race, religion, etc...

In order for this to happen, EVERYONE of ALL races and creeds have to do it. Live and let live, ya know what I mean?

And yes, the naysayers will say it's never gonna happen but this is what I would like to see happen.

Post a New Response

(1220071)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 07:07:02 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 27 23:49:16 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And they cannot consider that which the prosecution withholds.

Post a New Response

(1220073)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 07:08:46 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 27 23:51:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your statements are RW when they are in concurrence with the rest of the RW. It's a very simple correlatn.

Post a New Response

(1220082)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Nilet on Thu Aug 28 07:13:46 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 07:08:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
But Olog says right wing means European feudalism!

Post a New Response

(1220085)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Dave on Thu Aug 28 07:22:47 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 27 23:54:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
+1

Post a New Response

(1220094)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:15:41 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 07:07:02 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
True. But WHY would the prosecution want to do that?

Post a New Response

(1220097)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:17:46 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 07:08:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Wrong. My statements concerning this matter are in concurrence with anyone who has an ounce of intelligence and common sense. RW, LW, Centrist, etc...

Post a New Response

(1220100)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 08:38:06 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 27 23:49:16 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Those are petit juries. The discussion is about grand juries.

And in any case, juries actually know less than the public because they can only consider facts that have been entered into evidence by the parties. Those proceedings are public and members of the public can add their own information which the court has found inadmissible or either party has failed to admit for whatever reason.

Post a New Response

(1220104)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 09:06:05 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Aug 28 08:38:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I also mean GJs too, although they aren't shown ALL of the facts or evidence as their job is just to True Bill/not True Bill defendants.

Post a New Response

(1220131)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:33:40 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:15:41 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!!! I can't believe you asked that. Think blue line of silence. Are you THAT naive?

Post a New Response

(1220133)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:34:57 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Nilet on Thu Aug 28 07:13:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And that's oh so dysfunctional of him, isn't it?

Post a New Response

(1220136)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:42:16 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:17:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nope. Face it, you're lockstep RW.

Post a New Response

(1220138)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Aug 28 10:45:25 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Dave on Thu Aug 28 07:22:47 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Quit being such a misogynist :)

Post a New Response

(1220146)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Train Dude on Thu Aug 28 11:07:02 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 08:17:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well then, that explains why bingbong disagrees with you.

Post a New Response

(1220155)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 11:33:12 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Train Dude on Thu Aug 28 11:07:02 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Oh? Well then, answer this......when did "common sense" dictate that one doesn't stop shooting when the subjects hands are in the air, head bowed and statements like "I don't have a gun stop shooting" are made?

Post a New Response

(1220163)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Aug 28 11:45:28 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 11:33:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Until the suspect is on the ground and searched you cannot just assume he is telling the truth that he does not have a gun. Proper procedure would have been to have the suspect get on his knees or lying face down while keeping hands in the air and have a second officer approach with guns drawn to search the suspect. There appears to definitely have been a breakdown in proper procedure but what I have seen so far does not appear to give rise to Murder charges

Post a New Response

(1220169)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 12:29:50 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Aug 28 11:45:28 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Bottom line is this....wilson should have stopped shooting. Period. He did not.

Post a New Response

(1220172)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Aug 28 12:34:12 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 12:29:50 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Proper procedure would have dictated that, but deviating from procedure is not in and of itself grounds to sustain a Murder conviction in light of the fact that there was a size disparity and the pavement could have been used as a weapon

Post a New Response

(1220181)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Dave on Thu Aug 28 14:04:54 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Aug 28 10:45:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!!!

Post a New Response

(1220250)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:27:57 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:33:40 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Are you THAT paranoid is the question that should be asked...

Post a New Response

(1220253)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:33:05 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 10:42:16 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Do you have learning issues? If you didn't, you would SEE what I wrote. In your world, I guess having a certain opinion about subjects (individually I might add) means I share a certain political ideology.

BTW, YOU writing that I'm a "lockstep RWer" doesn't make it so, no matter how many times you type it.

Post a New Response

(1220254)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:34:35 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:27:57 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You're not paranoid if they really are out to get you. That being said, suppressed/excluded evidence happens way too often.

Post a New Response

(1220256)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:36:30 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:33:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No, I have no learning issues. You appear to. After all, you should know how what your saying here comes straight from the RW script, verbatim very often.

Post a New Response

(1220261)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:46:52 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:34:35 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You had better pull the tin-foil hat tighter over your head. And for Christ's sake, close the curtains!!!!


WHO suppresses the evidence, and WHY?

Post a New Response

(1220262)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:50:53 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:36:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Wrong again! There's a script?

Let me school you.. I'm a Centrist. Which means center. Which means that there are SOME issues that I agree with the Right about, SOME issues that I agree with the Right about, and other issues that I don't agree with either stance, taking some from both.

Get it? Good.

Post a New Response

(1220263)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:51:19 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:36:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Wrong again! There's a script?

Let me school you.. I'm a Centrist. Which means center. Which means that there are SOME issues that I agree with the Right about, SOME issues that I agree with the Left about, and other issues that I don't agree with either stance, taking some from both.

Get it? Good.

Post a New Response

(1220265)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:53:30 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:46:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Usually the prosecution. Usually because the whole truth would kill their case.

Post a New Response

(1220266)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:54:43 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:50:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What did I tell you?

:-) I did see your corrected version, but this one HAD to get the reply. THIW

Post a New Response

(1220267)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:57:08 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:51:19 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
When I see you concurring with the left, I'll see it. Haven't yet, doubt I will, especially on this one.

Post a New Response

(1220268)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 19:00:27 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:53:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Why would the whole truth kill the prosecution's case for the Brown incident?

Post a New Response

(1220269)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 19:08:27 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 18:57:08 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
A political ideology has NO corre;ation to a police shooting.

Post a New Response

(1220277)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:39:00 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 19:00:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
In his case, the prosecution does NOT a guilty verdict, to protect this cop.

Post a New Response

(1220278)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 19:43:32 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 18:50:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Centrists don't claim there is absolutely no racial profiling.


Post a New Response

(1220279)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:45:47 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 19:08:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not exactly. RWers, seeking to obtain and hold as much weaponry as possible as well as rationalize their racism, will support bad police especially when it suits their agenda on several levels, which the Ferguson case does.

A RW blogger got an xray from University of Iowa and suddenly this cop has a fractured eye socket. Nothing is further from the truth, yet YOU among other RWers here bandied those lies about as if sworn truth from above.

Now let's talk about waiting for evidence and common sense again. When did common sense dictate it was permissible to shoot to kill after the target effectively surrendered?

Post a New Response

(1220286)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:10:04 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:45:47 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I just explained to you that I'm a Centrist so I expect not to hear you call me a RWer again.

If you read my posts, ALL of them, NOT just what you want to read, you would see that I bandied NOTHING. I've ALWAYS stated "if true" as I am not stupid enough to believe different versions of events as the Gospel truth without me knowing the facts first.

You or me don't know that happened.


Pw3nt!

Post a New Response

(1220287)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:11:10 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:39:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Wouldn't the prosecution be trying to indict the cop, NOT aquit him?

Post a New Response

(1220288)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:13:48 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by AlM on Thu Aug 28 19:43:32 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
True, BUT stopping someone for walking in the middle of the road who's blocking traffic is certainly not profiling.

Post a New Response

(1220304)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:13:03 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:10:04 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That you acknowledged the "eye injury" existence to begin with reveals where your sympathies lie.

Post a New Response

(1220309)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:21:25 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 20:11:10 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nope. The prosecution wants to protect the cop from paying the penalty for something like this. He shot a black kid, and RWers think that black kids probably somehow deserve it. See it all the time even here, little asides about "those people". Look at how the RW responded to a college bound student......how many character assassinations have there been?

Justice gets twisted when it's one of their own actually doing the RW's bidding. Seeing how you're defending the NYC chokeholder cop (despite the medical examiner's report and all the other evidence) also speaks volumes about your attitudes. Might want to rethink that a bit.

Post a New Response

(1220314)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Dave on Thu Aug 28 21:31:49 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:21:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(1220315)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:36:29 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Dave on Thu Aug 28 21:31:49 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
YOUR information source, dave. You also bought into the fake xray eye socket lies.

Post a New Response

(1220316)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:43:27 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:13:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
By merely stating that there was a report of an eye injury means my sympathies are toward RWers?

Post a New Response

(1220318)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:45:25 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by Dave on Thu Aug 28 21:31:49 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I can see that....

Post a New Response

(1220319)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:48:19 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:43:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Considering it was a boldface lie, yes. In dong so, you endorsed it. Someone who was approaching this from neutral would have investigated and vetted the information, and you would have found it FALSE.

Post a New Response

(1220320)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:54:12 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:21:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Garner was a career criminal who resisted arrest by refusing to be cuffed AFTER the police told him several times to put his hands behind his back. "No!! This ends today!" (Yes it did!!!) Police work isn't Let's Make A Deal where we can negotiate whether or not we want to be taken into custody or not.

My attitude, as a lifetime NYer, is to defend the good people while having NO sympathy for the bad people.

P.S. EVERYONE who gets killed by the police is "getting his life together", an "aspiring rapper", "going to college", and all that good stuff. JUST like you accuse the police, courts, RWers of "character assasination", the other side always makes these guys look like altar boys even though in real life they were punk thugs. THIW.

Post a New Response

(1220321)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:57:30 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 21:48:19 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Uh.... How was anyone supposed to know it was a lie at first? Which is WHY I stated that it was reported....NOT fact!! Learn the difference sweetie....

Post a New Response

(1220323)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 22:00:13 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:54:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Michael Brown WAS about to be a college student. He had no criminal record. Nobody is saying he's a boy scout, but he wasn't a hardened criminal by any means.

Post a New Response

(1220324)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 22:02:43 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 21:57:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Look into it. The proof was right there ON THE XRAY ITSELF. All anyone had to do is look. However, since this played into the RW narrative, nobody would bother.

Post a New Response

(1220326)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Aug 28 22:10:03 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 19:45:47 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm sorry to say as I like Kevin but you are so full of shit it's unbelievable. For someone to take the side of a law enforcement officer over a THUG who just ROBBED a convenience store and then shoved the owner for stopping him is ridiculous. And then to call them racist. This is not right wing vs. left wing and it's not racial. It is not political. Race was brought into this by race baiters.

Post a New Response

(1220328)

view threaded

Re: I Applaud This Couple

Posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Aug 28 22:25:28 2014, in response to Re: I Applaud This Couple, posted by bingbong on Thu Aug 28 22:00:13 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah right. It's normal to rob cigars from a convenience store then shove the store owner when he tries to stop him. And then afterward have a physical altercation with a police officer. It's normal. I've done all those things many times.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10>> : Last

< Previous Page  

Page 7 of 21

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]