| Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot? (775799) | |||
|
|
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot? |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed May 4 21:18:30 2011, in response to Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot?, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed May 4 13:05:43 2011. There's no "outrage from Democrats" every time an enemy combatant is killed on the front lines. Also, "very true" is redundant.Now all of a sudden he's an "enemy combatant"? What happened to the "What uniform does he wear", "what army does he belong to", "when did Congress Declare war" nonsensical excuses that were used for 8 years? |