|
|
| Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot? (775994) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed May 4 23:18:29 2011, in response to Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 4 23:09:42 2011. It went back and forth. I remember the righties here in 2004 or 2005 said that al Qaeda weren't eligible to benefit from the Geneva Convention because they weren't soldiers, didn't wear uniforms, not under a flag etc.Then they changed it to they WERE soldiers to defend against trying them in civilian courts. That brings us to now and I would say they are still soldiers. your pal, Fred |
|
|
|