|
|
| Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot? (775909) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 4 22:28:23 2011, in response to Re: If bin Laden Was Unarmed, Why Was He Shot?, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed May 4 22:19:19 2011. To be entitled to MILITARY prosecution, or Geneva convention, one has to be a soldier ... I think the argument is that situations like his have never been formally addressed. So I'm just leaving it as "criminal" until there's a formal definition ... |
|
|
|