|
|
| Re: Supreme Court to strike down Roe (1896454) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Supreme Court to strike down Roe |
|
|
Posted by subfan on Wed May 4 13:53:08 2022, in response to Re: Supreme Court to strike down Roe, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 4 11:16:25 2022. They may or may not be human beings, but they're definitely something more than an appendix of the mother, to be disposed of without any moral quandary. This is not necessarily a religiously-based approach - it can be based on secular humanism as well. As such, there is a definite secular interest in preserving this potential human, though of course people can reasonably disagree on how to balance that interest with the rights of the motherSo - one person may favor blue laws to give workers a day off and another may favor them to rest on "the Lord's day" - but the blue laws are still constitutional. Similarly, one person may want to limit abortion based on a secular humanistic interest in the life of the fetus while another wants to limit it because they believe that that is the will of their chosen dirty - but that, too, has no impact on such a law's constitutionality. subfan |
|
|
|