|
|
| Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty (1220026) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Aug 28 03:40:39 2014, in response to Re: How Officer Wilson could avoid being found guilty, posted by Nilet on Thu Aug 28 00:36:39 2014. Listen, I'm being serious. Cut the shit with the name calling. I'm NOT a 60-something nebbish foamer who's part of the Asperger Army. Don't be an Internet Toughguy lest we were to meet at an event and when I call you out on it, I GUARENTEE you will pull a Ralph Kramden "homina homina homina"... I HOPE that this is the last time I have to address this issue. NO need for the name-calling...I'm going in the same order as your posts: Nope. NEVER did! A man's race has NOTHING to do with condemning anybody. I read the list and that has NO bearing on policing in America. Aggressive policing FOR THE MOST PART is where the lion's share of the crime takes place, no matter WHERE it is or WHO is doing it. He WAS a criminal before he got shot. In fact, they're about to release his juvenile record. True story. So, are you telling me that there are 2 seperate ways both policing and justice operate, one dealing with how white cops deal with a white public/criminals and the other how white cops deal with a black public/criminals? That line of thinking is what will CONTINUOUSLY devide people, NOT bring them together. Just for shits and giggles, say I was a cop and there are 2 identical scenarios.. One involves me having to shoot a white guy coming at me with a knife. The other is a black guy coming at me with a knife. Based on your logic, MERELY because of race, should there be 2 different kinds of investigations done prima face? |
|
|
|