Really, now, should this bus have gone out? (263020) | |
Home > BusChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(263020) | |
Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012 Not to get anyone into trouble, and I don't know a whole lot about busmaintenance, but here it is, sprawled over the front windshield. Seems a warning, to me at least. jrc |
|
(263059) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 20:45:39 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. There is no way that should be DRIVEN, never mind run in service! That writing is obscuring the B/Os vision!The bus might have been fixed on the overnight, but should NOT have been let out like that! |
|
(263075) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Bx36Ltd on Mon Jul 2 23:24:04 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. Im sure they fixed it just forgot to take that off the windshield |
|
(263079) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Jul 3 00:13:33 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. That to me is on the yard dispatcher, who should have known better. |
|
(263081) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Brooklyn67 on Tue Jul 3 00:46:01 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Jul 3 00:13:33 2012. No, it's on the bus driver who should have informed the yard dispatcher before pulling out. The yard SLD doesn't inspect buses and has no idea what's going on with details such as these. |
|
(263084) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Jul 3 02:55:14 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. if the operator ignored seeing THAT..then he shouldnt be on the road... |
|
(263088) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 3 04:59:32 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by Bx36Ltd on Mon Jul 2 23:24:04 2012. Yes, but the point is the scribble on the writing on the windshield reduces visibility for the b/o. He should have not left the depot with the bus in that condition. |
|
(263095) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by mci guy on Tue Jul 3 07:49:39 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by Brooklyn67 on Tue Jul 3 00:46:01 2012. b/o should never have taken that bus out. maintainers should have removed that writing from the window. |
|
(263101) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jul 3 08:36:31 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. Doesn't look like a problem to me, as long as the Stop Engine light was in the operator's hand. |
|
(263111) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by The Flxible Neofan on Tue Jul 3 11:10:27 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Jul 3 08:36:31 2012. LOL! |
|
(263122) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 3 18:09:54 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by mci guy on Tue Jul 3 07:49:39 2012. Hey b/o: you know that (pending) AVA you asked for?If you'd do me a favor and take this bus out, making an on time pullout, your AVA is granted! |
|
(263123) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Brooklyn67 on Tue Jul 3 18:19:25 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Tue Jul 3 18:09:54 2012. An AVA is a contractual right, not a granted privilege, and is further governed differently from location to location. See the 1994 MOU attachments. A better analogy might be:If you'd do me a favor and take this bus out, making an on time pullout, I'll make sure you have a good bus for the rest of the month. Or something similar. Or even something indicating he won't break chops with uniform, newspaper or other trivial non-transportation violations. |
|
(263129) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by (4) Lexington Av Exp on Tue Jul 3 22:06:08 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. Typical Gun Hill... |
|
(263130) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Tue Jul 3 22:09:50 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. Bronx division tend to do sloppy things like this.Depending on the depot some maintenance managers want heavy duty out of services to have shoe polish writing like this on the bus so it doesn't go out by mistake. Last year a maintenance superintendent got demoted for releasing a bus that had a major fuel line problem out the door and within a few blocks from the depot the line busted and fuel spilled all over the street and the bus had to be towed back in to the house. The major issue was that the super failed to shoe polish the window on the bus. Normally we use papers that say HOLD and when the operator is assigned the bus he is required to bring the hold paper back the yard dispatcher and verify the bus is OK for service. When working the yard you have between 50-100 pullouts in the rush, you don't know ever buses status especially when they are released from the maintenance department on the fly. In this situation the bus was released for service but no one wanted to wash off the the polish. Either the operator didn't care, or he told the yard dispatcher and he didn't care or maintenance didn't care the bus went out that way. Someone should have said no and it won't go till its cleaned off. |
|
(263143) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by Bx36Ltd on Wed Jul 4 05:18:05 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by Bx36Ltd on Mon Jul 2 23:24:04 2012. Very true mabe they was short on select buses but still ur right thou |
|
(263145) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 4 05:58:57 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by BigBusDriver on Mon Jul 2 20:45:39 2012. >>>>>The bus might have been fixed on the overnight, but should NOT have been let out like that!<<<If that's the case the B/O has no business "briving a dus"*. *Courtesy of Jackie Gleason as Ralph Kramden in The Honeymooners. 8-) |
|
(263154) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Wed Jul 4 11:03:48 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by mr mabstoa on Tue Jul 3 22:09:50 2012. That's Gun Hill depot for you. No surprise there. |
|
(263156) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by UTC Bus Roster on Wed Jul 4 12:11:54 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. Both the B/O AND the dispatcher should be written up.1) The dispatcher should nolt send AMY bus out with any writing obscuring the B/O vision (whether it was repaired or not) 2) The B/O should refuse to take ANY bus out with his/her vision obscured, and should also verify that this bus was indeed repaired, then have the windshield cleaned before even moving said bus! |
|
(263157) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 12:13:00 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by LRG5784 on Wed Jul 4 11:03:48 2012. I worked in KB also, and it wasn't much better.......... |
|
(263158) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by UTC Bus Roster on Wed Jul 4 12:13:05 2012, in response to Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by r17-6599 on Mon Jul 2 14:50:34 2012. Both the B/O AND the dispatcher should be written up.1) The dispatcher should not send ANY bus out with any writing obscuring the B/O vision (whether it was repaired or not) 2) The B/O should refuse to take ANY bus out with his/her vision obscured, and should also verify that this bus was indeed repaired, and then have the windshield cleaned before even moving said bus! |
|
(263160) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by merrick1 on Wed Jul 4 13:14:57 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by UTC Bus Roster on Wed Jul 4 12:13:05 2012. Is the writing in the driver's line of vision? It looks to me like it is below eye level.It looks like someone tried to clean the writing off and it smeared. What did they write with? Crayola makes window crayons that wash right off. |
|
(263162) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 14:08:31 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by merrick1 on Wed Jul 4 13:14:57 2012. They use white shoe polish.It doesn't come off easy, got to use a lot of elbow grease. |
|
(263164) | |
Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out? |
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Jul 4 14:11:46 2012, in response to Re: Really, now, should this bus have gone out?, posted by UTC Bus Roster on Wed Jul 4 12:11:54 2012. Maintenance may be complicit as well because in the rush they probably told the yard dispatcher they had no one to clean off the polish.I wouldn't have let the bus go out no matter what service needs were pressing. It makes the MTA look bad and in Manhattan divisiion it wouldn't have happened. When I had the QC in 2008 I held buses if they had an unpainted replacement part or grafitti. |
|