|
|
| Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder (698990) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 6 |
||
|
| (700012) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:18:40 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Thu Oct 30 20:59:01 2008. First of all you don't know the car#.So how could you know if the car was reefed prematurely or not? I don't think you are privy to all that is going on. |
|
|
| (700013) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Oct 30 21:26:22 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:18:40 2008. Ouch!But my sources likely do know. |
|
|
| (700016) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by David on Thu Oct 30 21:31:32 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Oct 30 21:16:16 2008. If I read "Train Dude"'s post correctly, there will be no retrieval because there's nothing to retrieve -- the initial report was incorrect.David |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (700020) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:38:58 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Thu Oct 30 21:26:22 2008. Not about this.Your sources are out of the loop in this area. |
|
|
| (700021) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Oct 30 21:40:13 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by David on Thu Oct 30 21:31:32 2008. The initial report was correct except for the three small points I raised. |
|
|
| (700022) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Non-Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Oct 30 21:40:22 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by David on Thu Oct 30 21:31:32 2008. The initial report was correct except for the three small points I raised. |
|
|
| (700024) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by aem7ac on Thu Oct 30 21:40:46 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:38:58 2008. seem like the two of you were talking about two different cars and two different systems. |
|
|
| (700025) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Oct 30 21:40:52 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Oct 30 21:16:16 2008. I guess they couldn't get the caveman to do it seeing that's so easy.So Lindsay Lohan was hired seeing that she's available. Heh! |
|
|
| (700029) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:56:19 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Thu Oct 30 21:40:13 2008. Like I told you, you don't even know the car#.Face it you are out of the loop. |
|
|
| (700113) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Fri Oct 31 03:03:07 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Railman718 on Wed Oct 29 19:53:53 2008. I'm always not in uniform. :-) |
|
|
| (700115) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by G1Ravage on Fri Oct 31 03:07:33 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by mr_brian on Wed Oct 29 20:30:26 2008. ^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
| (700213) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Bill From Maspeth on Fri Oct 31 12:11:21 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:38:58 2008. Obviously we have a difference of "opinion" here, different sources. Maybe we need the CIA or the Dept. of Homeland Security to get involved here? |
|
|
| (700381) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Fri Oct 31 20:06:46 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by G1Ravage on Fri Oct 31 03:03:07 2008. And rightfully so! ;-) |
|
|
| (700509) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Nov 1 09:39:38 2008, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Thu Oct 30 21:56:19 2008. Don't bet on it. Train Dude is in a potions to know, it's his job. |
|
|
| (760498) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sat Mar 21 21:31:57 2009, in response to TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Tue Oct 28 16:09:45 2008. so, Yea.... was this one ever resolved?? |
|
|
| (760519) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by David on Sat Mar 21 22:20:57 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by South Ferry on Sat Mar 21 21:31:57 2009. I don't think it was ever proven that this ever happened, or needed to happen.David |
|
|
| (760658) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Mar 22 09:54:48 2009, in response to TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Tue Oct 28 16:09:45 2008. Talk about a major oops!:) |
|
|
| (760667) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 10:26:33 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sun Mar 22 09:54:48 2009. Anyone would expect that the guys stripping down this equipment would find it. |
|
|
| (760670) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Mar 22 10:29:26 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 10:26:33 2009. Anyone would expect that the guys stripping down this equipment would find it.Not necessarily. Unless you know where the equipment was located and why they should have looked there. |
|
|
| (760672) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 10:30:58 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Mar 22 10:29:26 2009. That's true too. Then again, what was the dimensions of this device? Because it must have been small enough for the barn guys to miss it. |
|
|
| (760701) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:09:46 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Mar 22 10:29:26 2009. You do realize that you are still discussing a 6 month old hoax, right? |
|
|
| (760709) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Mar 22 12:30:04 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:09:46 2009. Not until right about now, no...... |
|
|
| (760716) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Mar 22 12:40:07 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:09:46 2009. A hoax? This is news to me. Necroposting finally pays off. |
|
|
| (760720) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:54:46 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by trainsarefun on Sun Mar 22 12:30:04 2009. ooops |
|
|
| (760722) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:56:09 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Mar 22 12:40:07 2009. I thought I de-bunked Rockpark Man's joke months ago! |
|
|
| (760724) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Sun Mar 22 12:57:53 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:56:09 2009. In our defense, there was occasionally a lot of tp to wade through in those days to get to anything of actual interest. |
|
|
| (760726) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Mar 22 12:59:13 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:54:46 2009. Actually, the reefing was on purpose. How are we supoposed to defend the US from underwater bioterrorism if there are no sensors down there? |
|
|
| (760780) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 15:04:21 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:56:09 2009. Uh oh, I've been fooled...!!! |
|
|
| (760782) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 15:08:23 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 15:04:21 2009. Would you like to ask NJT for some free tickets so you can come and ride the mini-RTSes in Morris County? For the record, the condition of bus 2575 is a good sign of how NJT neglects its contractors and the PBLs. |
|
|
| (760783) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 15:09:11 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 15:08:23 2009. Huh? |
|
|
| (760787) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 15:14:04 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sun Mar 22 15:09:11 2009. Part of that was a joke. I thought you wanted to ride on one of these or something? 
|
|
|
| (760911) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 20:56:23 2009, in response to TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Tue Oct 28 16:09:45 2008. Ohhhh boy, talk about..... |
|
|
| (760918) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:03:17 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 20:56:23 2009. Going to Moe's? |
|
|
| (760923) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 21:14:41 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:03:17 2009. Ya' know it!! :-D |
|
|
| (760928) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Andrew Saucci on Sun Mar 22 21:23:01 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 12:56:09 2009. "I thought I de-bunked Rockpark Man's joke months ago!"I read through the original discussion and all I could find was a post stating that the essential points of the original assertion were not true. Now, anyone can just come along here to SubChat, claiming that someone has a bit to spare in the baloney department, but the point is, our readers need proof! |
|
|
| (760935) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by error46146 on Sun Mar 22 21:38:58 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 15:08:23 2009. mini RTS's?what about mini Orion 5's lol |
|
|
| (760936) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:39:16 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 21:14:41 2009. Make sure you take PATH to JSQ instead of drive and pay the outrageous parking prices.For those that don't know, one of the many inspirations for Moe's Tavern was located near the JSQ PATH Station. |
|
|
| (760937) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:39:48 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by error46146 on Sun Mar 22 21:38:58 2009. See Bee-Line. |
|
|
| (760940) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 21:41:56 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:39:16 2009. Hey, Mr. Burns pays well enough for me to afford parking!! :-D lolBut then again, why not a trip on a PA-5!! |
|
|
| (760943) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:48:25 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 21:41:56 2009. Sorry, you're getting these. |
|
|
| (760947) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 21:50:23 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Ken S. on Sun Mar 22 21:48:25 2009. Ahhhhhhh, good old fashioned old school railcars, I shall taken 'em!! :-D |
|
|
| (760954) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 22:01:53 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Andrew Saucci on Sun Mar 22 21:23:01 2009. Yeah, I said:1) No car was reefed by mistake. 2) There was no radiobiological detector on board 3) The car was not going to be un-reefed What more tot he story was there? |
|
|
| (760956) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Mar 22 22:12:04 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 22:01:53 2009. Raquel Welch's diamond bra was hidden in the T/O's cab? |
|
|
| (760966) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by R32_3672 on Sun Mar 22 22:36:19 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 20:56:23 2009. how could they make a mistake in reafing the cars. |
|
|
| (760974) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 22:51:21 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by R32_3672 on Sun Mar 22 22:36:19 2009. Idiocy, incompetence, absentmindedness, you choose!! Either way, a major "DOH!!!" was in order!! I am sure someone (or some people) caught a chew out for this!! |
|
|
| (760987) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 22 23:27:34 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Sun Mar 22 22:51:21 2009. DUH!!! What part of "IT NEVER HAPPENED" don't you understand? |
|
|
| (761072) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Fine, Howard, and Fine on Mon Mar 23 09:27:29 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by vfrt on Tue Oct 28 16:49:35 2008. This publicly-posted thread is an attempt for the TA to save money by having Osama bin Laden and his Saudi backers pay for the recovery.If Osama and company recover the black box, they will be able to put the city into a reign of terror by dropping the box out of a window on Fifth avenue onto pedestrians below. |
|
|
| (761082) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Fine, Howard, and Fine on Mon Mar 23 10:13:28 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by vfrt on Tue Oct 28 16:49:35 2008. This publicly-posted thread is an attempt for the TA to save money by having Osama bin Laden and his Saudi backers pay for the recovery.If Osama and company recover the black box, they will be able to put the city into a reign of terror by dropping the box out of a window on Fifth avenue onto pedestrians below. |
|
|
| (761241) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Mar 23 15:46:59 2009, in response to TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by ROCKPARKMAN on Tue Oct 28 16:09:45 2008. Uh oh, it looks like someone's career is going to Davy Jone's Locker. |
|
|
| (761368) | |
Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Mar 23 22:36:34 2009, in response to Re: TAs Newest $16 Million Blunder, posted by Osmosis Jones on Mon Mar 23 15:46:59 2009. I guess you don't need to be confused by the facts either. |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 6 |
||
