|
|
| Re: 7 train tagged in service! (318514) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 11 of 12 |
||
|
| (320496) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:32:49 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Edwards! on Sat Oct 7 00:11:42 2006. Thank you. This is a very reasonable post and I really do appreciate seeing it. |
|
|
| (320499) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:35:24 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by BIE on Sat Oct 7 00:18:08 2006. Get lost JJB. Better yet, go to a mental hospital. You have no idea what makes a decent human being. |
|
|
| (320500) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:36:04 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by BIE on Sat Oct 7 00:20:06 2006. Yeah, b/c that punishment really fits the crime |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (320502) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:37:36 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 16:51:39 2006. I'll donate my time and effort as any money I have will end up being used to get there and back.....ah the "perks" of being a college student |
|
|
| (320509) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Oct 7 19:53:28 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006. |
|
|
| (320510) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by The Port of Authority on Sat Oct 7 19:53:40 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:37:36 2006. ah the "perks" of being a college studentTry being a "college student" on Metra... they won't give one any discounts whatsoever! |
|
|
| (320513) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Westinghouse XCB248S on Sat Oct 7 19:58:30 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Edwards! on Sat Oct 7 00:11:42 2006. Well spoken. |
|
|
| (320516) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:00:02 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Sat Oct 7 19:05:30 2006. Yea, I seen you around. |
|
|
| (320517) | |
Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:01:05 2006, in response to Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:31:20 2006. It also had a nice pattern. |
|
|
| (320518) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Westinghouse XCB248S on Sat Oct 7 20:01:06 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006. Vandalism is a crime and that is fact. What was shown in that picture was vandalism. It is an offense that will put you behind bars. |
|
|
| (320523) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:06:06 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Sat Oct 7 19:53:40 2006. College students here don't get any breaks either. |
|
|
| (320528) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Oct 7 20:10:01 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 16:51:39 2006. Excuse me? When the hell did I say tagging trains was cool!? |
|
|
| (320530) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 20:10:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Sat Oct 7 19:53:40 2006. Same with SEPTA, and of course, I miss out on NJTs college free thing. |
|
|
| (320534) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:12:42 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Oct 7 20:10:01 2006. Eh? Like every single post you made! |
|
|
| (320542) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Oct 7 20:20:29 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:12:42 2006. Well then whatever, Like I said in a few previous posts, bring back the Silver and Blue strip, that will make subway cars a bit better looking, and not a plain drabby color now. |
|
|
| (320546) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:25:40 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Oct 7 20:20:29 2006. and not a plain drabby color now.There's nothing 'drabby' about stainless steel. I happen to like the current idea of Stainless Steel cars. What I would've liked is a little more decor on the sides for the NTTs, a la the Strips on the R110s. I personally believe that the 110s were better looking. |
|
|
| (320562) | |
Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by tydev417 on Sat Oct 7 20:54:57 2006, in response to Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:31:20 2006. I feel that the current stainless steel look on the trains is the best for the times. The White and Aqua signified the 1964 World's Fair...why would we bring that back except on heritage/museum cars? Silver and Blue was nothing more than a makeshift paint scheme of the times as was the other schemes, there's nothing really special about it, it kind of reminds me of the bland paint scheme on the buses. And besides....no paint scheme at all is probably the cheapest in the MTA's eyes. If they did instate a paint scheme, I would prefer something new that reflects the system as it stands today. |
|
|
| (320570) | |
Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by the port of authority on Sat Oct 7 21:06:02 2006, in response to Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by tydev417 on Sat Oct 7 20:54:57 2006. What have you got against the silver and blue? You keep citing examples of it on traincars that weren't designed for it, yet you forget the intended application of it:
|
|
|
| (320572) | |
Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 7 21:09:18 2006, in response to Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by the port of authority on Sat Oct 7 21:06:02 2006. What have you got against the silver and blue?Light-resistant blue pigment is very expensive. Otherwise, it's OK. |
|
|
| (320585) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olney Terminal on Sat Oct 7 21:41:55 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Fri Oct 6 23:55:49 2006. When was the last time you bangabested your opinion? |
|
|
| (320621) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 22:29:27 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olney Terminal on Sat Oct 7 21:41:55 2006. Prolly not too long ago. Prolly more recently than I realize. |
|
|
| (320631) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 22:48:20 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:06:06 2006. Very true, b4 switching colleges, my LIRR expenses were pretty high. Would've been nice if my college StonyBrook at least chipped in for half. |
|
|
| (320636) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 22:50:33 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Oct 7 20:10:01 2006. here |
|
|
| (320637) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 22:51:38 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 22:48:20 2006. I'm glad I don't have to ride LIRR on the reg, although, I do find the experience refreshing after riding the subway all the time. |
|
|
| (320638) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 22:51:56 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 22:48:20 2006. When did you go to Stony Brook? My friend Natalie is a sophmore there, and now my friend Robyn just started |
|
|
| (320641) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 22:55:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 22:51:38 2006. I was originally going to go to Polytechnic in Brooklyn before I got accepted to Delaware. That would've been PW->Great Neck->Woodside->Jamaica->FBA(unless I could've gotten a train that makes PW and Woodside). No money for the subway. LIRR would've been expensive enough. |
|
|
| (320645) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 22:57:35 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 22:51:56 2006. Last year was my last. Took a year off and started in the city this semester. |
|
|
| (320647) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 22:59:18 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Grand Concourse on Sat Oct 7 22:57:35 2006. Where do you go now? |
|
|
| (320654) | |
Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by tydev417 on Sat Oct 7 23:06:25 2006, in response to Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by the port of authority on Sat Oct 7 21:06:02 2006. There's nothing special about it..it's just a bland blue stripe. I wouldn't want to see it on a R62 or R68 or even worse an R142 or R160.. It would look so out of place with the "feel" of the system today, stainless steel is fine for now until they get around to developing a newer scheme.And if the R44s were first delivered around 1971 and you say that the MTA Silver and Blue scheme was intended for the fleet, why are there shots of this MTA Blue and Silver scheme on older trains prior to 1971, before the R44s delivery? |
|
|
| (320659) | |
Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 23:25:53 2006, in response to Re: Best NYCT paint scheme(Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by tydev417 on Sat Oct 7 23:06:25 2006. Re-read what he said. It wasn't hard to understand. |
|
|
| (320701) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Oct 8 00:41:34 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Sat Oct 7 20:10:01 2006. 'When the hell did I say tagging trains was cool!? 'I don't believe you did..... |
|
|
| (320704) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Oct 8 00:43:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:12:42 2006. he never said that tagging trains was 'cool'. What he said(as far as I understood it as) is that he'd like to SEE grafitti return in some form. |
|
|
| (320706) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Oct 8 00:44:53 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 20:25:40 2006. 'There's nothing 'drabby' about stainless steel.' may not be 'drabby', but it is 'BORING" |
|
|
| (320708) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Sun Oct 8 00:46:58 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Westinghouse XCB248S on Sat Oct 7 20:01:06 2006. ' It is an offense that will put you behind bars'Graet!!!!... I'll order a Bud Light... |
|
|
| (320717) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sun Oct 8 00:53:19 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Sun Oct 8 00:43:47 2006. He never directly said those words. He repeatedly stated he wished that the graffitti on trains era returned. The only reason he'd want that would be if he thought it was 'cool'. |
|
|
| (320743) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 01:39:50 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Kriston Lewis on Sat Oct 7 19:53:28 2006. lol |
|
|
| (320744) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 01:41:27 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006. Wow getting people mad on this board is pathetically easy. lol. |
|
|
| (320751) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sun Oct 8 02:22:08 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 01:41:27 2006. Yes. People will defend those trains with their lives. Haha.People take this place too serious. |
|
|
| (320754) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:27:09 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Sat Oct 7 19:35:24 2006. Sorry; he's right. Lack of cruel and unusual punishment will be this country's downfall; but we do get cruel and unusual punishment from those not in authority (i.e. the criminals). |
|
|
| (320756) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:27:48 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sat Oct 7 00:42:31 2006. Don't be a punk. I think like him in this instance. You better start thinking like him too. |
|
|
| (320757) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:28:36 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006. Take your trolling somewhere else, loser. |
|
|
| (320758) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:29:18 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 01:41:27 2006. That's because you're a pathetic troll with no life. Any other board you would have been banned right away. |
|
|
| (320759) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:29:41 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by J trainloco on Sun Oct 8 02:22:08 2006. You agree with the troll? Wow, I'm not surprised. |
|
|
| (320760) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:30:14 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 01:39:50 2006. Wait until it happens. |
|
|
| (320761) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:32:31 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Edwards! on Sat Oct 7 00:11:42 2006. Wow, that's a bit restrained. May as well let 'im know how you really feel . . . |
|
|
| (320763) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:34:52 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006. BTW, it's not "prude, stuck-up foamers" who ask for a clean subway car. |
|
|
| (320766) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 02:52:49 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 02:34:52 2006. Never said that.People who demand vandals' eyes gouged out, however, are prude, stuck-up foamers, and it was to those people at whom that comment was directed. As I said before, getting people mad on this board is too easy. You only further proved it. |
|
|
| (320769) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 03:14:31 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Sun Oct 8 02:52:49 2006. Getting people mad on any message board is easy. You just have to act as foolish as you did in this post. What message board do you know of if, when you go on like that, they remain incredibly thick-skinned? I don't know of a single one, apart from a few Usenet newsgroups . . .People who demand vandals' eyes gouged out, however, are prude, stuck-up foamers I wouldn't call them that. There was but one person who said that, but you won't call him to the carpet on it. BTW, the ones you described as "prude, stuck-up foamers" are the ones that, according to you, are 'who think that it looks ugly or that it "distracts from the natural beauty of the subway car" or whatever', not the ones that want to put the eyes out of taggers. You also said they "need to just simply shut your fucking pieholes and look at it as art", which is a load of hooey. Your own words make you into a liar. Personally, I'd put taggers in the stocks for about a week or so.  |
|
|
| (320782) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Sun Oct 8 06:08:40 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Edwards! on Wed Oct 4 20:48:00 2006. Don't you EVER confuse IND CARS with BMT cars again! The IND....! The Best.. of the best..of the Best.....SIR! That's right - don't associate the BMT with the garbage that used to run on the IND ;-) BMT was the GREATEST of all time!! |
|
|
| (320801) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 8 10:39:49 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Nilet on Wed Oct 4 23:58:35 2006. You'd lower your standards over a so-called RFW . . . ? |
|
|
|
Page 11 of 12 |
||
