|
|
| Re: 7 train tagged in service! (318514) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 6 of 12 |
||
|
| (319106) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:32:29 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Oct 3 21:56:54 2006. Yuck |
|
|
| (319107) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service-Just As I Figured |
|
|
Posted by ALP44 on Wed Oct 4 14:32:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 20:49:30 2006. So you don't have an answer then Mr Know-It-All. Your silence tells me that I am right after all. Think before you speak........Dufus.ALP 44 |
|
|
| (319110) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:39:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Dave on Wed Oct 4 05:13:25 2006. IAWTP |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (319111) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:40:05 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 22:14:43 2006. Now THAT is something that I hope to NEVER see on our subways. Just a bunch of meaningless tags. |
|
|
| (319114) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Wed Oct 4 14:42:15 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by tydev417 on Wed Oct 4 13:15:48 2006. There is a good reminder of the I hope to be forgotten past.What a disgrace!Thanks for the old picture. |
|
|
| (319115) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Oct 4 14:42:17 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by The Port of Authority on Tue Oct 3 21:56:54 2006. I like that! |
|
|
| (319116) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:42:36 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 00:04:46 2006. haha no |
|
|
| (319118) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:43:27 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Allan on Wed Oct 4 08:22:35 2006. That actually sounds like fun |
|
|
| (319120) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:45:32 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Oct 4 10:21:13 2006. As much as I know that was just a BS post to rile people up, I will say this. I don't care how people speak here. Speak how you feel comfortable speaking when amongst friends(IE, here). |
|
|
| (319121) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:45:54 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 5119 on Wed Oct 4 11:49:53 2006. Deported? |
|
|
| (319122) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:48:11 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 00:11:12 2006. Cash played a whole bunch of prisons. I have Folsom and San Quentin |
|
|
| (319123) | |
Re: THE TRUTH from G1Ravage (Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Wed Oct 4 14:48:13 2006, in response to THE TRUTH from G1Ravage (Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 4 00:23:11 2006. you'll see some very faded "colors" on the side of the train, as well as in the doorway, and the doorway "step".And stainless steel is a bugger to clean completely, it seems. The T/A can't paint it ,either, it would be the odd ball in the fleet. Thanks for the information about it probably being an old photo. |
|
|
| (319124) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Oct 4 14:48:54 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Oct 3 22:15:06 2006. I have seen trains covered with spraypaint in europe, and I still find the window scratches worse. Paint is easy to remove, and scratching requires the replacement of a part.Of course, both should never be tolerated. |
|
|
| (319125) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:50:12 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 23:42:19 2006. Why? B/c you failed to read the rest of my post like you constantly do and now you think that I want to see more vandalization of the subways? I'm sorry, but you are way off |
|
|
| (319127) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:51:22 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 23:45:03 2006. Yes, b/c everyone must think like you do...People are entitled to their opinions on ANY matter, whether you like it or not. |
|
|
| (319128) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:52:15 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Westinghouse XCB248S on Tue Oct 3 23:46:26 2006. Well honestly, how can MTA really combat scratchiti? |
|
|
| (319129) | |
Re: THE TRUTH from G1Ravage (Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Oct 4 14:52:49 2006, in response to THE TRUTH from G1Ravage (Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 4 00:23:11 2006. Still, it should never have been put on the road like that, then or now. |
|
|
| (319130) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 14:53:54 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Oct 4 11:02:55 2006. both beautiful views!but you are not supposed to use a flash! |
|
|
| (319131) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 14:55:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Dave on Wed Oct 4 05:13:25 2006. just came back from the optometrist, but he did not 'check' them, They are still the same color....... |
|
|
| (319132) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 14:55:31 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:39:00 2006. just came back from the optometrist, but he did not 'check' them, They are still the same color....... |
|
|
| (319133) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:40:31 2006. I agree.And all you prude, stuck-up foamers who think that it looks ugly or that it "distracts from the natural beauty of the subway car" or whatever need to just simply shut your fucking pieholes and look at it as art. |
|
|
| (319134) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 14:56:16 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Oct 4 11:00:00 2006. 'But criminal is in the eye of the law' well if they see the criminal, then they should arrest them |
|
|
| (319135) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:57:23 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 23:50:15 2006. You blatently ignore the artistic ability of graffiti artists soley because they vandalize. You know some of these people do tasteful work, but b/c they present it through a medium that is illegal, you can't accept it. Illegal or not, it's art.And for you to say if he was interested in art, he would've used a canvas is perhaps one of the most ignorant statements I've heard relating to this issue. If he wasn't interested in art, he would've just put some meaningless lines along the car to make some stupid tag. No, this is intricate and time consuming. |
|
|
| (319136) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:58:53 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 3 23:39:28 2006. A simple crappy ass tag done in one color that takes up a lot of space on a train is disgusting.An elaborate design like that, however, is nice. When you see people getting shot and stabbed on the subway, trains derailing every day, lights not working, and litter all over the place, then you have something to complain about. |
|
|
| (319137) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:00:27 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by SilverFox on Wed Oct 4 04:24:00 2006. 'The subway was a place nobody wanted to be; ' I enjoyed it, and I worked there 'not even if they had to be there.' I CHOSE to be there 'Unlike today.' where I still choose to be there |
|
|
| (319138) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 15:00:37 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 00:24:26 2006. Dude, c'mon. Why do you think so many out of towners still view the subways as dirty and dangerous. Not everyone thought that way, but the MAJORITY did, and the majority is who the MTA cares, and should care, about. |
|
|
| (319139) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 15:00:54 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by tydev417 on Wed Oct 4 13:15:48 2006. Well no shit it looks ugly, you have a bunch of non-elaborate boring tags on a what is already dirty ass train.But I suppose there's no getting through to you foamers, is there? |
|
|
| (319141) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:03:37 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by SilverFox on Wed Oct 4 04:24:00 2006. 'I hope you can now understand and appreciate our desire for keeping graffiti as far OFF subways and buses and other public fixtures as much as possible.' 'Graffiti have sort-of reinvented themselves as "ghetto chic",' so what's wrong with adding a little "ghetto chic" to the system now..... |
|
|
| (319144) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:09:03 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Allan on Wed Oct 4 08:22:35 2006. it's very easy to find out where he lives........... |
|
|
| (319145) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 15:10:40 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by SilverFox on Wed Oct 4 04:24:00 2006. While I do agree that the rampance of graffiti on subways in the 80s was disgusting, I think the fact that the overall time was not a highlight for New York makes people fear graffiti even more today. I highly doubt that should a graffiti epidemic return to the subways that it would come with the crime and lack of maitenance that was experienced in the 80s. |
|
|
| (319146) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 15:13:32 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by SilverFox on Wed Oct 4 04:29:24 2006. Excuse me, but you need to finish reading the rest of my post and realize that I understand that this is vandalism and that it needed to be removed as quickly as possible. I have said that I like the idea of the city commisioning a subway car to have a mural. That is the only way I'd actually ever support graffiti on the subways. |
|
|
| (319147) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:18:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by tydev417 on Wed Oct 4 13:15:48 2006. ahhh, such beauty....wish I photographed more like these |
|
|
| (319149) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 15:21:17 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 14:55:48 2006. wo, dude, chill. They've got good reason. The 80s were a fucking nightmare. It was disgusting because anything tasteful was covered over in a matter of days by some bullshit tags. |
|
|
| (319150) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Oct 4 15:22:29 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Oct 4 09:09:00 2006. Go to school and learn English.I think he was being satirical. |
|
|
| (319151) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:24:27 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 15:21:17 2006. 'The 80s were a fucking nightmare'while I did have a few 'fucking nightmares', I also had much fun in the '80's......... |
|
|
| (319153) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by motorman on Wed Oct 4 15:25:04 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by tydev417 on Wed Oct 4 13:15:48 2006. I remember riding the R16's from Canarsie in the late 1970's and the motormen never liked them. they were too slow. |
|
|
| (319155) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Oct 4 15:26:36 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 14:45:54 2006. Deported?Yes; the Vandals should be rounded up and sent back to Scandinavia before they do to the subway system what they did to Rome in the fifth century. |
|
|
| (319157) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:26:52 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Oct 4 15:00:37 2006. 'Why do you think so many out of towners still view the subways as dirty and dangerous'because they are not accustomed to riding on the subway....... |
|
|
| (319158) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:28:56 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by motorman on Wed Oct 4 15:25:04 2006. 'I remember riding the R16's from Canarsie in the late 1970's and the motormen never liked them. they were too slow.'the motormen or the 16's were to slow???? |
|
|
| (319159) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Wed Oct 4 15:29:54 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:28:56 2006. I think he means that the 16's were slow. |
|
|
| (319161) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:30:10 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Oct 4 15:26:36 2006. ' the Vandals should be rounded up and sent back to Scandinavia before they do to the subway system what they did to Rome in the fifth century'the Vandals have the ability of Time Travel?????? |
|
|
| (319162) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:30:45 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by R36 #9346 on Wed Oct 4 15:29:54 2006. I operated them too, to me they did not appear to be slow..... |
|
|
| (319164) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:31:49 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:30:45 2006. the 16's, that isI did not operate the other motormen...... |
|
|
| (319165) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by motorman on Wed Oct 4 15:31:56 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by R36 #9346 on Wed Oct 4 15:29:54 2006. The 16's were slow, not the motormen!!! |
|
|
| (319171) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by tydev417 on Wed Oct 4 15:43:48 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by 1/9 Broadway Local on Wed Oct 4 15:00:54 2006. But I suppose there's no getting through to you foamers, is there?Stop acting like an ass about it, Graffiti is NOT art when it's plastered all over the subway's fleet and it certainly isn't welcome now 20 years later. Get over it. |
|
|
| (319173) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Oct 4 15:49:35 2006, in response to I SMELL A RAT!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:07:45 2006. What could Photoshop possibly have to do with the date on the file?As Jeff H already pointed out, Photoshop was used, probably to crop or resize the image (799x621 doesn't seem like a standard camera resolution) and/or correct brightness or color. The graffiti does not look like it was digitally added. |
|
|
| (319174) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Oct 4 15:53:00 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Wed Oct 4 15:30:10 2006. the Vandals have the ability of Time Travel??????No, just longevity |
|
|
| (319178) | |
Re: THE TRUTH from G1Ravage (Re: 7 train tagged in service!) |
|
|
Posted by William A. Padron on Wed Oct 4 16:07:31 2006, in response to THE TRUTH from G1Ravage (Re: 7 train tagged in service!), posted by G1Ravage on Wed Oct 4 00:23:11 2006. Well, I rode an AM rush hour Manhattan-bound #7 train that had R-62A #1801 in the consist today (Wednesday 10/04/2006). At the last stop of Times Square, I was able to see and can verify the paint residue that was left behind on the car (its side facing in a southwardly fashion) up close after its cleaning.-William A. Padron ["Roosevelt Av.-Jackson Heights"] |
|
|
| (319179) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! - clean photos |
|
|
Posted by Atomsk on Wed Oct 4 16:13:38 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service! - clean photos, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 23:11:01 2006. Either they did a better job removing it, than the previous poster said, or this is the other side of the car. |
|
|
| (319181) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Oct 4 16:20:57 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Tue Oct 3 23:26:49 2006. Well then they should bring back the old Silver and Blue. It's better then graffiti. |
|
|
|
Page 6 of 12 |
||
