|
|
| 7 train tagged in service! (318514) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 12 |
|
|
| (318514) | |
7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006 
|
|
|
| (318515) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:40:31 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. Beutiful!!! |
|
|
| (318516) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:42:24 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. Whoa. That thing should have never left the yard! I hope someone gets in trouble for it. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (318517) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Oct 3 17:42:52 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. They must have been short on cars... |
|
|
| (318518) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Oct 3 17:43:19 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:42:24 2006. I agree. |
|
|
| (318519) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:43:36 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:40:31 2006. IAWTP!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (318520) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:43:41 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:42:24 2006. Why should they get in trouble for it? Who is it going to hurt when it's in service like that? it brings back the 80's. |
|
|
| (318521) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:44:01 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by RonInBayside on Tue Oct 3 17:43:19 2006. I don't agree. |
|
|
| (318522) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:44:37 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:42:24 2006. what was the day/date of this photo? |
|
|
| (318523) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 17:45:31 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. Good catch (I assume you took the photo since it is in your account). |
|
|
| (318524) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:46:05 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:43:41 2006. 'Why should they get in trouble for it? ' t/o's are supposed to walk around their trains before putting them in service if there is any 'artwork' found, the train is not supposed to leave the yard |
|
|
| (318525) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:47:08 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:46:05 2006. "if there is any 'artwork' found, the train is not supposed to leave the yard"That's a stupid rule. |
|
|
| (318526) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:47:17 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by RonInBayside on Tue Oct 3 17:42:52 2006. 'They must have been short on cars... ' would they be tall in trucks? |
|
|
| (318527) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Oct 3 17:47:44 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. Yikes!!!!!!!Something I don't want to make a return appearance on any car. Good find, thanks for sharing the picture. |
|
|
| (318528) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:48:27 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:47:08 2006. 'That's a stupid rule.' if you want a job with transit, get accustomed to this type of rule |
|
|
| (318529) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:48:49 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:48:27 2006. I know that. But it's just my opinion. |
|
|
| (318531) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:50:18 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:43:41 2006. You're young. The grafitti era was BAD. Stop romanticizing it. |
|
|
| (318532) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:51:16 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:48:49 2006. 'But it's just my opinion'you are not alone with that opinion...... |
|
|
| (318533) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:52:06 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:46:05 2006. I don't want to see any MTA employee disciplined, but ANY weakening of the "zero tolerance" policy towards grafitti will only invite more vandalism. These things CANNOT run on the road like that. |
|
|
| (318534) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:52:22 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:50:18 2006. 'The grafitti era was BAD.'when it was good it was good when it was BAD, it was better! |
|
|
| (318535) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 17:52:33 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:44:01 2006. I disagree with your disagreement. That level of vandalism on rolling stock should not be tolerated. Whoever is responsible for letting it out on the road in that condition should be disciplined. |
|
|
| (318536) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:53:14 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:52:06 2006. But tell me, is there any harm done? |
|
|
| (318537) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:53:38 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:52:06 2006. 'but ANY weakening of the "zero tolerance" policy towards grafitti'have you seen what has been done to trains' windows?????????????? |
|
|
| (318538) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:53:53 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 17:52:33 2006. But why can't the train run on the road like that? Will it hurt anyone? |
|
|
| (318539) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:54:46 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:42:24 2006. And besides, it's not on the windows so it will not bother the people. |
|
|
| (318540) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 17:54:48 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:44:37 2006. According to the EXIF info, it was taken on February 3, 2030 at 3:54AM.He needs to set up his camera... And I'd like to know the date/time as well. If it was today and recently, having that info in the OP would be useful in case someone wanted to head out to try to get more shots of it. |
|
|
| (318541) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:55:17 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 17:54:48 2006. I would love to get a shot of that car. |
|
|
| (318542) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:56:19 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:53:14 2006. 'is there any harm done?'it would be like, a beautiful woman who takes great pride in her appearance to discover a blemish on her face while glancing in a mirror just before greeting her invited gue$t$ |
|
|
| (318543) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by David on Tue Oct 3 17:58:12 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:53:14 2006. A great deal of harm is done. It tells the customers that NYCT is getting lax in its effort to keep the fleet clean, which then can make customers wonder whether NYCT is also getting lax in its effort to keep the fleet maintained, which can then make customers become ex-customers. It also tells the graffiti scrawlers that they can get away with graffiti, which can make them (and others who might consider doing more than scrawling graffiti) believe that they can get away with other things, such as other forms of vandalism, thievery, etc.Do some research on the "broken windows" theory of policing for more on this issue. David |
|
|
| (318544) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:59:13 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. This is the thing, these days, there is never a great photo of a train like that. If it were me, I will try to take the most photos of a train like that, with and with out zoom. That was just a "quickie" shot of that car. |
|
|
| (318546) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:00:23 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by David on Tue Oct 3 17:58:12 2006. Well your right. But it was only the out side of the train. Now if it were the inside of the train, where people get there cloths dirty, then I can understand. |
|
|
| (318547) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 18:00:29 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by David on Tue Oct 3 17:58:12 2006. 'A great deal of harm is done. It tells the customers that NYCT is getting lax in its effort to keep the fleet clean' have you seen trains' windows lately????????????? |
|
|
| (318549) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 18:01:44 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 17:53:38 2006. That's another topic. The old spray-paint grafitti is more striking and it recalls a BAD time for this city. Billions were spend over many years to finally get rid of it. We can't slip back into that era. |
|
|
| (318550) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Oct 3 18:04:21 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:47:08 2006. That's a great rule. |
|
|
| (318551) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:05:08 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by RonInBayside on Tue Oct 3 18:04:21 2006. No. |
|
|
| (318552) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 18:05:49 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 18:01:44 2006. 'That's another topic' not entirely.... |
|
|
| (318553) | |
I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:07:45 2006, in response to 7 train tagged in service!, posted by gonzea on Tue Oct 3 17:39:55 2006. I looked at the exif data for the image.Date modified: Sunday, February 03, 2030 03:54:51 AM! Additionally, the Date taken and Date digitized fields both contain this futuristic date. I detect a Photoshopping! (Though the actual software used to modify the image is open to debate.) |
|
|
| (318554) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Tue Oct 3 18:09:06 2006, in response to I SMELL A RAT!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:07:45 2006. what exactly does a rat smell like???I know what dead rats smell like, after a few days that is... |
|
|
| (318555) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 18:11:12 2006, in response to I SMELL A RAT!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:07:45 2006. http://www.subchat.com/read.asp?Id=318540While I do not claim to be a photoshop master, AFAIK, that date and time was recorded by the camera and does not in any way, say that the photo was photoshopped. |
|
|
| (318557) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Oct 3 18:13:47 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 17:53:53 2006. It stirs up the epidemic of graffiti. We had enough of that horror, thank you. |
|
|
| (318559) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:14:20 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Oct 3 18:13:47 2006. Well, I would not mind it for a little while... |
|
|
| (318560) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Tue Oct 3 18:14:21 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:00:23 2006. One thing leads to another. If they let it on the outside, it won't be long before they get to the inside. We've already seen that. |
|
|
| (318561) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:15:02 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Wado MP73 on Tue Oct 3 18:14:21 2006. True. The outside=not too bad, the inside=very bad. |
|
|
| (318562) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Tue Oct 3 18:16:38 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:14:20 2006. Travel to Central and Eastern Europe. |
|
|
| (318564) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:19:38 2006, in response to Re: I SMELL A RAT!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 18:11:12 2006. Why would a digital camera be set to a future date. Even when you turn it on for the first time, the date is set to something in the past, like 2000.Would it make sense for a person to mess with his camera's date and time settings just for one photograph? Especially with modern cameras, the date and time settings are buried in menus, so it would have taken a few seconds to adjust the date and time like that. I detect a fake, or his camera needs a dose of this. |
|
|
| (318565) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:21:05 2006, in response to Re: I SMELL A RAT!, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 18:11:12 2006. Why would a digital camera be set to a future date? Even when you turn it on for the first time (after you take it out of the box for the first time and put the batteries in for the first time), the date is set to something in the past, like 2000.Would it make sense for a person to mess with his camera's date and time settings just for one photograph? Especially with modern cameras, the date and time settings are buried in menus, so it would have taken a few seconds to adjust the date and time like that. I detect a fake, or his camera needs a dose of this. |
|
|
| (318570) | |
Re: I SMELL A RAT! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Oct 3 18:24:48 2006, in response to Re: I SMELL A RAT!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:21:05 2006. How do you fake those value of the EXIF if they say they are recorded by the camera? Photoshop would add its own EXIF entries. |
|
|
| (318572) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:25:43 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:15:02 2006. No graf >>> exterior graf >> interior graf. |
|
|
| (318575) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Tue Oct 3 18:26:58 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Oct 3 18:25:43 2006. That sounds like the main sequence of events. |
|
|
| (318577) | |
Re: 7 train tagged in service! |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Tue Oct 3 18:27:40 2006, in response to Re: 7 train tagged in service!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Oct 3 17:52:06 2006. I still find spraypainting significantly less irritating then window scratches. |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 12 |
|
