|
|
| IBX Label (1645498) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (1645501) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 17:14:41 2025, in response to IBX Label, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 17 16:56:18 2025. I doubt it. I think they want it to feel special and totally different from the subway system.There was a NIMBY meeting at Christ the King in Middle Village last month. They talked about why they ghink IBX is a fantasy. They mentioned the fact that the section of track between Fresh Pond Yard and the section north isn't even owned by the MTA. It's owned by CSX. Also said there is a high rise under construction at Roosevelt Avenue and it would take a feat of engineering to squeeze IBX in between. |
|
|
| (1645502) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Wed Dec 17 18:11:34 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 17:14:41 2025. Shouldnt be a problem. After all they built the 6th Ave subway that was indeed a monumental feat of engineering & ingenuity. This by comparison should be a piece of cake |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (1645503) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 19:42:06 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Wed Dec 17 18:11:34 2025. There apparently is a very real problem with the high rise and running this project next to it.And then there's the issue with CSX ownership of the line beyond Fresh Pond Junction. |
|
|
| (1645506) | |
Re: IBX Label NIMBY reply |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 23:26:07 2025, in response to IBX Label, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 17 16:56:18 2025. linkInteresting letter. I have a List of handles whose reaction to this letter, I'd like to read. Middle Village and Maspeth are very opposed to IBX. |
|
|
| (1645507) | |
Re: IBX Label NIMBY reply |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 23:57:26 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label NIMBY reply, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 23:26:07 2025. I hope no one here sends hate (e-) mail to makes nasty phone calls to Mr. Graziano.But I can think of a few handles here who are capable of such hatred. |
|
|
| (1645508) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by sloth on Thu Dec 18 00:01:45 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 19:42:06 2025. Either they have some assurances from CSX, or they're idiots. I'll take "idiots" for 2,000, Alex. |
|
|
| (1645510) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Thu Dec 18 02:04:15 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label, posted by sloth on Thu Dec 18 00:01:45 2025. i am ware that IBX is planned to be LR. This prevents the connection over Hell Gate. This defeats a major goal of linking the Bronx to the many Brooklyn routes. While transfers to/from New Rochelle to Penn trains will make a connection possible, I doubt the freqencies would match, |
|
|
| (1645512) | |
Re: IBX Label NIMBY reply |
|
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Thu Dec 18 02:44:30 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label NIMBY reply, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 17 23:26:07 2025. I gather Grazano went looking for nominal roadblocks, but they seem common--hat is, not insurmountable. if the ROW did not exist, and predate the lives of all of these residents, I might have more sympathy. As to "engineering feats" the hard work was done when the route was first constructed. if built as an FRA compatible rather than light rail operation.the bsic issue would be repairing/restoring the mainline tracks w/catenary. i remember seeing NH rlrctric freight engines from the windows of a Sea Beach train in the late 60s. |
|
|
| (1645515) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Thu Dec 18 06:39:37 2025, in response to IBX Label, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 17 16:56:18 2025. I'd settle for fare integration. Have they promised it yet? If you can't do subway-IBX-subway on one fare a lot of the purpose of this project is being defeated. |
|
|
| (1645520) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Dec 18 08:42:39 2025, in response to IBX Label, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 17 16:56:18 2025. >when |
|
|
| (1645532) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by Italianstallion on Thu Dec 18 13:41:28 2025, in response to IBX Label, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 17 16:56:18 2025. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1645533) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by Italianstallion on Thu Dec 18 13:42:29 2025, in response to Re: IBX Label, posted by sloth on Thu Dec 18 00:01:45 2025. Of course there’s an understanding. |
|
|
| (1645550) | |
Re: IBX Label |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Dec 19 09:24:36 2025, in response to IBX Label, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 17 16:56:18 2025. The "QB" lives again!! |
|
|
