| Re: L line extension to New Jersey. (1467595) | |
|
|
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
| (1467938) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sat Mar 3 07:05:02 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by Italianstallion on Fri Mar 2 23:14:27 2018. They you have the buffer strength disparity. 200K pounds for an A Divsision car, 400K pounds for a PATH car. What happens when the PATH car or some compromise car rams the IRT car ? |
|
| (1468093) | |
Re: 6 line extension to New Jersey |
|
|
Posted by LA Scott on Sat Mar 3 22:16:16 2018, in response to Re: 6 line extension to New Jersey, posted by Italianstallion on Fri Mar 2 23:16:05 2018. In this case, the "digging" is though one of the most expensive, complex, and high profile developments in the country, including though the foundations of 1000+ foot buildings. |
|
| (1468094) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by LA Scott on Sat Mar 3 22:21:52 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Fri Mar 2 12:18:36 2018. I took the 7 from GCT at 5:30 on Friday.The trains were so crowded that I waited for 2 Queens bound 7 trains to go by before I got on. However, the platform still had room for circulation. The limiting factor is not platform space, but the capacity of outbound trains, which would not be significantly impacted by a NJ connection. |
|
| (Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
| (1468095) | |
Re: 6 line extension to New Jersey |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 22:38:40 2018, in response to Re: 6 line extension to New Jersey, posted by LA Scott on Sat Mar 3 22:16:16 2018. If it's under the road, it's not under their foundations.Either way, it's DOA. |
|
| (1468173) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Mar 4 13:49:21 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by LA Scott on Sat Mar 3 22:21:52 2018. Correct. |
|
| (1468221) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Sun Mar 4 17:44:02 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by LA Scott on Sat Mar 3 22:21:52 2018. Until new travel/work/home choice patterns evolve. The subway as a whole is greater than the sum of the parts. |
|
| (1468529) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by JAFO on Tue Mar 6 19:41:58 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by LA Scott on Sat Mar 3 22:21:52 2018. if PATH builds new tunnels rather than connect to existing IRT tunnels, they can size them to the existing (and future) fleetand provide another way to bring commuter-rail service to NYC instead of kinda-commuter-subway service |
|
| (1468556) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Mar 6 21:20:50 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by #5 - Dyre Ave on Fri Mar 2 14:27:08 2018. Dunno about PATH. I've always thought that the existing east and west terminals more or less match. Adding another terminal on either side would bend that. |
|
| (1468560) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by JAFO on Tue Mar 6 21:50:41 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by Joe V on Sat Mar 3 07:05:02 2018. if not PATH. why not NJTransit instead, with properly sized tunnels for their current & future fleet? |
|
| (1468563) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Mar 6 22:15:45 2018, in response to Re: L line extension to New Jersey., posted by Italianstallion on Fri Mar 2 23:14:27 2018. Only practical thing I can think of is articulated PATH-sized cars. |
|
| (1468566) | |
Re: L line extension to New Jersey. |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Mar 6 22:21:58 2018, in response to L line extension to New Jersey., posted by Wallyhorse on Thu Mar 1 10:09:02 2018. The 9th Street PATH station is already conveniently close to the main campus. |
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||