Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit (1393422) | |
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 3 of 3 |
(1393984) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Apr 29 22:31:57 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by Peter Rosa on Fri Apr 29 22:19:06 2016. LOL...when I was at John Jay College of Criminals, there was an old salt of a law professor, who used to say jurors were to stupid to get out of jury duty... |
|
(1393986) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 29 22:44:15 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Apr 29 22:31:57 2016. Voir dire, to the defense attorney, "Hey! That guy owes me money!"Thank you ... :) |
|
(1394019) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sat Apr 30 10:17:55 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by jabrams on Fri Apr 29 17:48:19 2016. NOPE, The equipment needs to be powered up, air compressors, HVAC, lighting etc etc.If you climb up on top of a rail car, you do it on your own dime. ROAR |
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It
|
(1394020) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Apr 30 10:19:16 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 27 11:23:05 2016. Common sense has been legislated out of existence. |
|
(1394033) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Apr 30 14:31:23 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Apr 30 10:19:16 2016. Actually, legislation has been separated from common sense...LOL... |
|
(1394058) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by randyo on Sat Apr 30 18:35:10 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 29 22:44:15 2016. I actually had a similar situation a few years ago. When the jury panel went up to the courtroom, it turned out that one of the lawyers had represented me in a auto accident a few years earlier. Needless to say, I was excused. It also turns out that when the schedule office was at 130 Livingston, I would hang out in the Old Cafe across the street and hoist a few with a number of lawyers, court clerks and even a few judges. Also One of the societies i belong to has a number of judges among its membership so the likelihood of serving before a judge I don’t personally know or opposite a lawyer I don’t personally know is highly diminished. |
|
(1394072) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by pragmatist on Sat Apr 30 19:43:16 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by randyo on Sat Apr 30 18:35:10 2016. It has gotten almost silly at jury duty around here. The number of people getting excused got so high that (of course) they overreacted and make almost everyone come in (if their group number is called) if you have already had a postponement, and sit in the pool for a day before being excused. they used to automatically excuse lots of people by job category. Last time I sat and chatted it up with a woman who was an assistant DA. Not the slightest chance of ever getting on a criminal case, knew just about every judge and lawyer, wasn't going to get picked for a civil jury either. She had to stay the day, its supposed to make everyone else feel better. I would have felt better if our tax dollars were paying her to prosecute a criminal, and not knit a scarf. At least we have tv and internet access by me now. |
|
(1394096) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Apr 30 23:12:08 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by randyo on Sat Apr 30 18:35:10 2016. Wish that worked up here. Small town living, we all know each other anyway. :) |
|
(1394118) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Sun May 1 08:55:15 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Apr 26 07:38:37 2016. Shaddap. |
|
(1394123) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun May 1 09:09:54 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by Mitch45 on Sun May 1 08:55:15 2016. Nope. You lose. |
|
(1394253) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed! |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon May 2 14:02:43 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Apr 30 14:31:23 2016. The plaintiff has voluntarily dropped his lawsuit against Amtrak and the MBTA, after the judge in the case ruled that his own drunkenness and reckless behavior could be brought up by the defense at trial.The judge specifically cited the "obvious danger of the live catenary wire" in his decision. |
|
(1394254) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed! |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon May 2 14:05:40 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon May 2 14:02:43 2016. To be more precise, the plaintiff's lawyer realized he'd spend his time more productively playing golf than continuing with this case. |
|
(1394255) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed! |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon May 2 14:11:16 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed!, posted by AlM on Mon May 2 14:05:40 2016. I'm surprised this dimbulb actually found a lawyer willing to take the case to begin with. |
|
(1394256) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed! |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon May 2 14:14:56 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon May 2 14:11:16 2016. Works on Contingency?No, Money Down! |
|
(1394263) | |
Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed! |
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon May 2 14:52:27 2016, in response to Re: A ''Shocking'' Lawsuit--Case Dismissed!, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon May 2 14:14:56 2016. the plaintiff should have been fined for 1. trespassing, and 2. filing a nuisance action. The attorney should have been reprimanded for # 2. |
|
Page 3 of 3 |