Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(1384491)

view threaded

Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 10:57:36 2016

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
1959: NYC Transit Authority initiates a major service change on the IRT West Side routes (today’s #1, 2, and 3). The service pattern still in use today begins on this date, which routes all Upper Broadway (#1) trains on local tracks south of 96th Street, and Lenox-Bronx services on express tracks south of 96th Street (#2 and #3). Local station platforms at 50th, 59th, 66th, 79th and 86th Streets are lengthened from five to ten cars to accommodate the new # 1 Local service (dubbed “Hi-Speed Local”). 91st Street Station is closed. 96th Street station is rebuilt with a new south mezzanine leading to 94th Street.

The old practice of switching trains between local and express tracks north of 96th Street, with its resultant delays, is eliminated. Those crossovers are still there but not used on a daily basis as was the case before 2/6/59.

Post a New Response

(1384493)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Dan on Sat Feb 6 11:04:30 2016, in response to Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 10:57:36 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The pre-1959 pattern must have screwed up many a rush hour. What was the reasoning behind it?

Post a New Response

(1384494)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 11:08:41 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Dan on Sat Feb 6 11:04:30 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Biggest problem was the 5 car platforms south of 96th Street at the local stations. Broadway Express trains to/from 242nd St. could only run on express tracks south of 96th, and had to be switched. 7th Ave. Locals to/from 145/Lenox also had to be switched N of 96th because these trains (today's #3 but local S of 96) provided the 24/7 local service south of 96th Street. Broadway Locals between 137 and S Ferry did not run nights and Sundays.

Post a New Response

(Sponsored)

iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It

(1384496)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Dan on Sat Feb 6 11:26:50 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 11:08:41 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Wasn't that at one time an at-grade track crossing or am I thinking of somewhere else on the IRT?

Post a New Response

(1384506)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Joe on Sat Feb 6 12:29:51 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Dan on Sat Feb 6 11:26:50 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
For twenty of the years we lived on Marble Hill, Broadway-7th Avenue expresses were our only service. Certainly, I can recall (as a member of the flat-nose club) waiting for a Lenox Local to cross in front of us as we approached 96th Street. However, the ability to run express thereafter was remarkable. I think the only restrictive timer was on the dip into 42nd Street station, where there once had been a derailment.
---
Northbound, we would cross over from express to local at 96th Street. Yes, these were at-grade crossings, and they did sometimes block other traffic. However, I have to state that the advertised high-speed local could be a pain because of holds. For seven years in the 1960's, I traveled from Marble Hill to South Ferry on Saturday afternoons. Would I win the gamble of moving to an express at 96th Street? At least half the time, I awaited my original local at Chambers Street. The other 50% of the time, I would catch his leader.
---
Nowadays, northbound and southbound expresses meet restrictive timers that needlessly take the rapid out of rapid transit.

Post a New Response

(1384526)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Feb 6 15:00:21 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Joe on Sat Feb 6 12:29:51 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, now it's leisurely transit. You'll get there - eventually.

Post a New Response

(1384544)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 18:22:21 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Dan on Sat Feb 6 11:26:50 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It was and still is an at grade crossing, just south of where the tracks separate north of 96th and go either to Lenox or Upper Broadway. That's why the 1959 route modifications are still in effect, to eliminate daily crossover use and the resultant delays. There is also a crossover between the N and S Express tracks, in use today because the #3 did not operate N of 96th in revenue service. It relayed in the lower level express tunnel.

Post a New Response

(1384553)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Joe on Sat Feb 6 20:07:50 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 18:22:21 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm much puzzled by Andy's statement, "The #3 did not operate N of 96th in revenue service. It relayed in the lower level express tunnel." Back issues of the ERA NY Division Headlights should clarify this. In the 1940's and through most of the 1950's, there were 5-car Lenox Avenue locals, terminating at 145th and Lenox. On the express track at 96th Street, you had Broadway-7th Avenue Expresses to Van Cortlandt Park and 7th Avenue Expresses to (and here I can be wrong) Bronx Park, the stub-end terminal closed in 1952. I do not recall any variation when locals terminated at 96th Street. I think the Lenox Avenue locals did not run at all hours in the 1940's, as the 137th Street locals did.

Post a New Response

(1384560)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by randyo on Sat Feb 6 20:41:39 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Joe on Sat Feb 6 20:07:50 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
At one time, the IRT and BMT did not run exp service overnight. The Bway service from V/C ran lcl in Manhattan and Xed over N/O Chambers St. Wets Farms expresses stopped running at night as did the 241 Wh POl Rd Lex expresses which were the main service from WPR at the time. Booth the West Farms exps and Lex/WPR exps were replaced by 7 Av lcls that ran from 241 WPR to So//Fy and Xed over to the lcl at 96 St. 145 St service was provided by shuttles that operated to 96 St and turned back S/O the station using the Xover between the exp tks which was removed when the 96 St platform were extended south circa 1959. At some point (i’m not sure when) Lenox service stopped running at all overnight and the Bway V/C trains began to run exp in Manhattan. I should mention that IRT 10 car exps cut to 5 cars overnight except on Friday PMs when they were cut to the 7 car consists that IRT expresses ran on weekends.

Post a New Response

(1384564)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 21:07:41 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Joe on Sat Feb 6 20:07:50 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Sorry for the confusion. By "today" I meant this weekend (Feb 6 and 7, 2016) due to the GO in effect, the #3 was turned at 96th St. Did not mean in general in the contemporary era.

Post a New Response

(1384581)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Feb 6 23:41:19 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by randyo on Sat Feb 6 20:41:39 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I remember riding on seven-car 2 trains on Saturdays in the late 70s.

Post a New Response

(1384692)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by milantram on Sun Feb 7 13:40:41 2016, in response to Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 10:57:36 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
With this changeover, the last Hi-Vs were retired.

Post a New Response

(1384877)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by randyo on Mon Feb 8 16:03:40 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by milantram on Sun Feb 7 13:40:41 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They may have been retired from passenger service, but they remained in work service at least another year. I was going to high school near V/C at the time and I remember seeing work trains with Hi-Vs in V/C station well into 1960.

Post a New Response

(1384879)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Elkeeper on Mon Feb 8 16:17:25 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Dan on Sat Feb 6 11:04:30 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The switching north of 96th St goes back to the 1904 opening, when the upper west side of Manhattan was not developed.

Post a New Response

(1384880)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by Michael549 on Mon Feb 8 16:41:22 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by andy on Sat Feb 6 21:07:41 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Thanks for clearing up the confusion.

I was thinking that if there was a Broadway local service from South Ferry to 96th Street, would have been a simpler way. Just leave that terminating local train on the local tracks at 96th Street and send that train to the middle track north of the 96th Street station but closer to the 103rd Street station on the #1 line for the terminate/relay operation?

Just a thought.

Mike


Post a New Response

(1384920)

view threaded

Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6

Posted by renee gil on Tue Feb 9 01:30:12 2016, in response to Re: Andy's Almanac - February 6, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Sat Feb 6 23:41:19 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Weekend seven-car 6 trains were common in the mid 90s.

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]