|
|
| Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels (1321747) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (1321817) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Fri Oct 31 13:57:27 2014, in response to Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Gold_12th on Fri Oct 31 00:09:30 2014. I was thinking that it’s highly likely that work on the other river tunnels will only have to be done one track at a time since the tubes are more isolated from each other than they were in the Montague St tube. As I have mentioned before, Montague was unique in that the Nassau Cut junction was actually under the East river itself and the way the connections were built, both tubes had to be shut down to effect repairs. There is more isolation between the N/B and S/B tubes of most of the other river tunnels so the necessary repair work can probably be done one tube at a time. |
|
|
| (1321819) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Fri Oct 31 14:07:15 2014, in response to Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Gold_12th on Fri Oct 31 00:09:30 2014. spell error...It is nothing like the Montague Tunnel repairs that has taken over a year to do major work. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (1321848) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Fri Oct 31 19:58:35 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Gold_12th on Fri Oct 31 14:07:15 2014. How well did the weekend R run during the Montague outrage ? |
|
|
| (1321852) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Gold_12th on Fri Oct 31 20:37:08 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Joe V on Fri Oct 31 19:58:35 2014. fantastic |
|
|
| (1321879) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sat Nov 1 07:00:59 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Gold_12th on Fri Oct 31 20:37:08 2014. Some say problems in Queens cause the R to be a mess in Brooklyn, yet the R weekends over the Bridge worked fine. Maybe the route needs to be broken up: W and RJ. |
|
|
| (1321881) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 CHRIS on Sat Nov 1 07:11:19 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by randyo on Fri Oct 31 13:57:27 2014. I remember when they were doing work in the 14th st tubes years back, they did sort of a shuttle back and forth on the L train weekends. This was way back in the 90s. They only did one tube at a time as not to completely shut down the line there. |
|
|
| (1321900) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by zac on Sat Nov 1 09:53:55 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by gp38/r42 CHRIS on Sat Nov 1 07:11:19 2014. And unlike the tubes from Downtown, there isn't much of an alternate to the L. It is also as busy at night and on weekends as it is during the week. Hipsters don't have banker's hours. |
|
|
| (1321936) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Michael549 on Sat Nov 1 16:53:55 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by gp38/r42 CHRIS on Sat Nov 1 07:11:19 2014. I believe for some G.O.'s then that the MTA had a train that traveled back and forth between Eighth Avenue and Bedford Avenue, and another train traveled between Bedford Avenue and the last stop in Canarsie.Mike |
|
|
| (1321943) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Nov 1 18:03:34 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Michael549 on Sat Nov 1 16:53:55 2014. That is correct. |
|
|
| (1321960) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Nov 1 22:00:24 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Joe V on Sat Nov 1 07:00:59 2014. Yes,it should be split. |
|
|
| (1321964) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Nov 1 23:08:00 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Joe V on Sat Nov 1 07:00:59 2014. So no trains from Whitehall to Brooklyn? |
|
|
| (1322060) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sun Nov 2 19:22:41 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by Edwards! on Sat Nov 1 22:00:24 2014. The problem is that one of the main justifications for Chrystie St was to eliminate one way lines that went from the outer boroughs to Manhattan loaded and returning empty. The idea was that trains going in both directions would be carrying full loads of passengers. |
|
|
| (1322071) | |
Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Nov 2 20:15:55 2014, in response to Re: Sandy repairs plan for Cranberry (A)(C), Rutgers (F) and Clark (2)(3) subway tunnels, posted by randyo on Sun Nov 2 19:22:41 2014. So we had QJ's running from Broad Street to Brighton Beach in the AM rush empty, and so on and so forth for other reverse peak/3 boro trains. |
|
|
