|
|
| Re: ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice? (879713) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Dec 29 06:56:26 2009, in response to Re: ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice?, posted by Dutchrailnut on Tue Dec 29 06:01:07 2009. No, he clearly wrote "with any luck the first water tunnel will finally be closed for structural inspections when the third water tunnel is opened."For structural inspections! That's the whole point of the new tunnels! Build an alternate tunnel so the original can be closed, inspected, and repaired. That's what he's talking about. I don't know why in the world you would think WillD doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to the water tunnels. They are practically his specialty. |
|
|
|