|
|
| Re: ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice? (879877) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice? |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Tue Dec 29 12:59:02 2009, in response to Re: ARC to GCT - Why Not the Option of Choice?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Dec 29 11:01:25 2009. Oh yeah right. Countenancing pork is a "specialty"?What exactly have I said that is incorrect? The 7 train tail tracks don't provide an impediment to the NYP connector track? The ALP45DPs will be capable of pulling trains up from the lowest point of the Hudson tunnel? The first water tunnel does not create an effective barrier to any attempt to build anything between 5th and 6th Avenues? because he sure doesn't bother to find a way to make the tunnels cost as little as they ought to be. And what do you mean by that? Do you want to reduce the tunnel diameter and in doing so constrain future rolling stock additions? Perhaps you'd prefer a project which squanders billions of dollars extending the subway into NJ, yet still requires everyone to change trains and thus is never as fully utilized as a project such as I describe would be. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|