|
|
| Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? (730463) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Jan 6 12:19:30 2009, in response to Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 6 11:25:11 2009. You missed my point.In the 1950s, nobody gave a shit how many homes you wrecked. So putting in transit in the median would be far more beneficial in the long haul than the few homes you supposedly saved. Housing gets rebuilt; density changes. |
|
|
|