Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? (729839) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late? |
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:58:29 2009, in response to Re: Why was 179th St/Jamaica 13 years late?, posted by randyo on Sun Jan 4 21:57:17 2009. So the two are independent of each other (ie it doesn't matter whether switches are put in first or machine first). |
(There are no responses to this message.)