Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: TA is obsessed with CBTC, and ''New'' tech for no reason.

Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Fri Feb 29 22:50:49 2008, in response to Re: TA is obsessed with CBTC, and ''New'' tech for no reason., posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Feb 29 22:12:50 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Is that why some motorman operate with the door open?

These days, BS repellant is not enough, you need RAID, because managment keeps multiplying, and cloging up the system with its BS. It has gotten to the point where it seems they have a Managment Creation Department, which is where the queen must be.
By the way, who is the genius they hire to decide where timers go? Or is nobody accountable for anything anymore?

By the way, speakeing of sealed cabs, do the Comet 5 cars on NJT allow the engineer to open his window? It looked sealed, as it also lacks a door. Do the designers of the car assume the Engineer is a maniac who may either:
1) open the door, and fall out?
2) Open the window, or door, during cold weather, and freeze to death?
3) Set the throttle, beat the deadman's and jump off. or set the throttle through the window, and run away?
4) Distract himself by looking right to try to open the window, and then forget to look ahead when the task of openning the window is complete?
5) Have the amount of common sense as managment does?

If it is because of structural rigidity that the cars lack doors, thet is bull. There should be beams and bulkheads at the end of the car to prevent crushing during collisions - which most trains have, even the Low-Vs.
So can someone explain the lack of a door?


Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]