Re: SAS/four tracks (557305)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: SAS/four tracks

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 16:54:05 2008, in response to Re: SAS/four tracks, posted by Wallyhorse on Mon Jan 21 15:46:02 2008. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d A two track SAS is better than NO SAS. The biggest problem with the projects over the years is that they bite off more than they can chew. At least with this, we can actually get the line built. There is no money for a four track line. And if they begin it, we will go into som 4th incarnation of this route, as it too will never be finished. It's important that it gets built, and now. It's better to have a 2 track line, than plans for a 4 track one that never gets built.

Responses

• Re: SAS/four tracks - RonInBayside - Mon Jan 21 16:56:32 2008
• Re: SAS/four tracks - Wallyhorse - Mon Jan 21 20:24:12 2008
  • Re: SAS/four tracks - Kew Gardens Teleport - Mon Jan 21 21:04:21 2008
    • Re: SAS/four tracks - Wallyhorse - Tue Jan 22 01:24:02 2008
      • Re: SAS/four tracks - SMAZ - Tue Jan 22 04:15:04 2008
      • Re: SAS/four tracks - Kew Gardens Teleport - Tue Jan 22 07:05:20 2008

Post a New Response